Elaheh Noursadeghi
ABSTRACT
This paper deals with the problem of designing a distributed fault detection algorithm for nonlinear large-scale systems. In the proposed algorithm, instead of a central detection node, several interconnected local detectors (LD) are employed. Each LD has a limited observation of the system's state and communicates with its neighbors to exchange processed information. The outlet of the detection nodes is the collective probability of failure associated with the system's fault mode. Simulation results illustrate the efficiency of the proposed approach and prove that the stronger communication amongst the LDs will lead to more reliable and faster results.
- M. S. Arulampalam, S. Maskell, N. Gordon, and T. Clapp. A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-gaussian bayesian tracking. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50(2): 174--188, 2002. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. Azizi and K. Khorasani. A distributed kalman filter for actuator fault estimation of deep space formation flying satellites. In 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference, pages 354--359, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Basseville, I. V. Nikiforov, et al. Detection of abrupt changes: theory and application, volume 104. Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Boem, R. M. Ferrari, T. Parisini, and M. M. Polycarpou. A distributed fault detection methodology for a class of large-scale uncertain input-output discrete-time nonlinear systems. In 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC), pages 897--902, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Boem, R. M. Ferrari, T. Parisini, and M. M. Polycarpou. Distributed fault diagnosis for input-output continuous-time nonlinear systems. In Fault Detection, Supervision and Safety of Technical Processes, volume 8, pages 1089--1094, 2012.Google Scholar
- F. Boem, R. M. Ferrari, T. Parisini, and M. M. Polycarpou. Distributed fault diagnosis for continuous-time nonlinear systems: The input--output case. Annual Reviews in Control, 37(1): 163--169, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Boem, Y. Xu, C. Fischione, and T. Parisini. Distributed fault detection using sensor networks and pareto estimation. In European Control Conference (ECC), pages 932--937. IEEE, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Z. Chen. Bayesian filtering: From kalman filters to particle filters, and beyond. Statistics, 182(1): 1--69, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Chib and E. Greenberg. Understanding the metropolis-hastings algorithm. The american statistician, 49(4): 327--335, 1995.Google Scholar
- S. X. Ding, P. Zhang, C. Chihaia, W. Li, Y. Wang, and E. Ding. Advanced design scheme for fault tolerant distributed networked control systems. In Proceedings of the 17th IFAC world congress, pages 13569--13574. Seoul, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Douc and O. Cappé. Comparison of resampling schemes for particle filtering. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis, ISPA, pages 64--69. IEEE, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Doucet. Monte carlo methods for signal processing: a review in the statistical signal processing context. Signal Processing, 2005.Google Scholar
- A. Doucet, N. De Freitas, and N. Gordon. Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice. Springer, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Doucet, S. Godsill, and C. Andrieu. On sequential monte carlo sampling methods for bayesian filtering. Statistics and computing, 10(3): 197--208, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Doucet and A. M. Johansen. A tutorial on particle filtering and smoothing: Fifteen years later. Handbook of Nonlinear Filtering, 12: 656--704, 2009.Google Scholar
- R. M. Ferrari, T. Parisini, and M. M. Polycarpou. Distributed fault diagnosis with overlapping decompositions and consensus filters. In American Control Conference (ACC), pages 693--698. IEEE, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. M. G. Ferrari, T. Parisini, and M. M. Polycarpou. Distributed fault detection and isolation of large-scale discrete-time nonlinear systems: An adaptive approximation approach. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 57(2): 275--290, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Ghasemi and K. Khorasani. Distributed fault detection and isolation in formation flight of satellites using extended kalman filters. In International Conference on Advances in Engineering and Technology (ICAET), 2014.Google Scholar
- O. Hlinka, F. Hlawatsch, and P. M. Djuric. Distributed particle filtering in agent networks: A survey, classification, and comparison. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 30(1): 61--81, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. Kadirkamanathan, P. Li, M. Jaward, and S. Fabri. A sequential monte carlo filtering approach to fault detection and isolation in nonlinear systems. In Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, volume 5, pages 4341--4346, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. Kadirkamanathan, P. Li, M. H. Jaward, and S. G. Fabri. Particle filtering-based fault detection in non-linear stochastic systems. International Journal of Systems Science, 33(4): 259--265, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Kong, J. S. Liu, and W. H. Wong. Sequential imputations and bayesian missing data problems. Journal of the American statistical association, 89(425): 278--288, 1994.Google Scholar
- X. Koutsoukos, J. Kurien, and F. Zhao. Monitoring and diagnosis of hybrid systems using particle filtering methods. In International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, 2002.Google Scholar
- J. S. Liu. Metropolized independent sampling with comparisons to rejection sampling and importance sampling. Statistics and Computing, 6(2): 113--119, 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Mesbahi and M. Egerstedt. Graph theoretic methods in multiagent networks. Princeton University Press, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Meskin and K. Khorasani. Actuator fault detection and isolation for a network of unmanned vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 54(4): 835--840, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Meskin, K. Khorasani, and C. Rabbath. Hybrid fault detection and isolation strategy for non-linear systems in the presence of large environmental disturbances. IET control theory & applications, 4(12): 2879--2895, 2010.Google Scholar
- N. Meskin, K. Khorasani, and C. A. Rabbath. A hybrid fault detection and isolation strategy for a network of unmanned vehicles in presence of large environmental disturbances. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 18(6): 1422--1429, 2010.Google Scholar
- S. Narasimhan, R. Dearden, and E. Benazera. Combining particle filters and consistency-based approaches for monitoring and diagnosis of stochastic hybrid systems. In 15th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis (DX04), Carcassonne, France. Citeseer, 2004.Google Scholar
- R. Olfati-Saber, J. A. Fax, and R. M. Murray. Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(1): 215--233, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Orchard, B. Wu, and G. Vachtsevanos. A particle filtering framework for failure prognosis. In World Tribology Congress III, pages 883--884. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. E. Orchard. A particle filtering-based framework for on-line fault diagnosis and failure prognosis. Technical report, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2007.Google Scholar
- M. E. Orchard and G. J. Vachtsevanos. A particle-filtering approach for on-line fault diagnosis and failure prognosis. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 31(3--4): 221--246, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. K. Pitt and N. Shephard. Filtering via simulation: Auxiliary particle filters. Journal of the American statistical association, 94(446): 590--599, 1999.Google Scholar
- I. A. Raptis, C. Sconyers, R. Martin, R. Mah, N. Oza, D. Mavris, and G. J. Vachtsevanos. A particle filtering-based framework for real-time fault diagnosis of autonomous vehicles. In Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, 2013.Google Scholar
- I. A. Raptis and G. Vachtsevanos. An adaptive particle filtering-based framework for real-time fault diagnosis and failure prognosis of environmental control systems. In The Prognostics and Health Management, 2011.Google Scholar
- B. Ristic, S. Arulampalam, and N. Gordon. Beyond the Kalman filter: Particle filters for tracking applications. Artech house, 2004.Google Scholar
- I. Roychoudhury, G. Biswas, and X. Koutsoukos. Comprehensive diagnosis of continuous systems using dynamic bayes nets. In Proc. of the 19th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis, pages 151--158, 2008.Google Scholar
- I. Roychoudhury, G. Biswas, and X. Koutsoukos. Designing distributed diagnosers for complex continuous systems. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 6(2): 277--290, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. Shames, A. M. Teixeira, H. Sandberg, and K. H. Johansson. Distributed fault detection for interconnected second-order systems. Automatica, 47(12): 2757--2764, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Stankovic, N. Ilic, Z. Djurovic, M. Stankovic, and K. H. Johansson. Consensus based overlapping decentralized fault detection and isolation. In IEEE Conference on Control and Fault-Tolerant Systems, pages 570--575, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Walsh. Markov chain monte carlo and gibbs sampling. 2004.Google Scholar
- L. Xiao and S. Boyd. Fast linear iterations for distributed averaging. Systems & Control Letters, 53(1): 65--78, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Xiao, S. Boyd, and S. Lall. A scheme for robust distributed sensor fusion based on average consensus. In Fourth International IEEE Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pages 63--70, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Distributed fault detection of nonlinear large-scale dynamic systems
Recommendations
Observer-based nonlinear feedback decentralized neural adaptive dynamic surface control for large-scale nonlinear systems
This paper presents a nonlinear gain feedback technique for observer-based decentralized neural adaptive dynamic surface control of a class of large-scale nonlinear systems with immeasurable states and uncertain interconnections among subsystems. Neural ...
Observer-Based Adaptive Decentralized Fuzzy Fault-Tolerant Control of Nonlinear Large-Scale Systems With Actuator Failures
This paper investigates the adaptive fuzzy decentralized fault-tolerant control (FTC) problem for a class of nonlinear large-scale systems in strict-feedback form. The considered nonlinear system contains the unknown nonlinear functions, i.e., ...
Composite adaptive fuzzy output feedback dynamic surface control design for stochastic large-scale nonlinear systems with unknown dead zone
In this paper, a composite adaptive fuzzy output feedback decentralized control problem is investigated for a class of nonlinear stochastic large-scale systems. The nonlinear large-scale systems under study have unknown nonlinear functions, unknown dead-...
Comments