skip to main content
10.1145/2739480.2754757acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Guiding Evolutionary Search with Association Rules for Solving Weighted CSPs

Published: 11 July 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Weighted constraint satisfaction problems are difficult optimization problems that could model applications from various domains. Evolutionary algorithms are not the first option for solving such type of problems. In this work, the evolutionary algorithm uses the information extracted from the previous best solutions to guide the search in the next iterations. After the archive of previous best solutions has been sufficiently (re)filled, a data mining module is called to find association rules between variables and values. The generated rules are used to improve further the search process. Different methods of applying the association rules are investigated. Computational experiments are done on academic and real-world problem instances. The obtained results validate the approach and show that it is competitive with existing approaches in literature.

References

[1]
R. Agrawal and S. Ramakrishnan. Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In Proceedings of 20th International Conference of Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), volume 1215, pages 487--499, 1994.
[2]
S. Baluja. Population-based incremental learning: A method for integrating genetic search based function optimization and competitive learning. Technical Report Carnegie Mellon University-CS-94--163, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1994.
[3]
J. Chia, C. Goh, K. Tan, and V. Shim. Memetic informed evolutionary optimization via data mining. Memetic Computing, 3(2):73--87, 2011.
[4]
B. Craenen, A. Eiben, and J. van Hemert. Comparing evolutionary algorithms on binary constraint satisfaction problems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 7(5):424--444, 2003.
[5]
S. de Givry, M. Zytnicki, F. Heras, and J. Larrosa. Existential arc consistency: Getting closer to full arc consistency in weighted csps. In Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI'05, pages 84--89, 2005.
[6]
R. Dechter. Constraint processing. Morgan Kaufmann, 2003.
[7]
A. A. Freitas. A survey of evolutionary algorithms for data mining and knowledge discovery. In Advances in Evolutionary Computing, pages 819--845. 2003.
[8]
J. E. Gallardo, C. Cotta, and A. J. Fernández. Solving weighted constraint satisfaction problems with memetic/exact hybrid algorithms. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 35(1):533--555, 2009.
[9]
N. Gharbi, F. Hemery, C. Lecoutre, and O. Roussel. Sliced table constraints: Combining compression and tabular reduction. In Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming, pages 120--135. Springer, 2014.
[10]
D. E. Goldberg. The design of innovation: Lessons from and for competent genetic algorithms. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, USA, 2002.
[11]
J. Han, J. Pei, and Y. Yin. Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, volume 29, pages 1--12, 2000.
[12]
M. Ionita, C. Croitoru, and M. Breaban. Incorporating inference into evolutionary algorithms for max-csp. In Hybrid Metaheuristics, pages 139--149. Springer, 2006.
[13]
L. Jourdan, C. Dhaenens, and E.-G. Talbi. Using datamining techniques to help metaheuristics: A short survey. In Hybrid Metaheuristics, pages 57--69. Springer, 2006.
[14]
K. Kask and R. Dechter. Gsat and local consistency. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1, IJCAI'95, pages 616--622, 1995.
[15]
J. Larrosa and R. Dechter. Boosting search with variable elimination in constraint optimization and constraint satisfaction problems. Constraints, 8(3):303--326, 2003.
[16]
S. Loudni and P. Boizumault. Combining vns with constraint programming for solving anytime optimization problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 191(3):705 -- 735, 2008.
[17]
R. Michalski. Learnable evolution model: Evolutionary processes guided by machine learning. Machine Learning, 38(1--2):9--40, 2000.
[18]
S. Minton, M. D. Johnston, A. B. Philips, and P. Laird. Minimizing conflicts: a heuristic repair method for constraint satisfaction and scheduling problems. Artificial Intelligence, 58(1--3):161 -- 205, 1992.
[19]
P. Morris. The breakout method for escaping local minima. In Proceedings of the 11th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 40--45, 1993.
[20]
K. Nonobe and T. Ibaraki. An improved tabu search method for the weighted constraint satisfaction problem. Infor-Information Systems and Operational Research, 39(2):131--151, 2001.
[21]
L. D. Raedt, S. Nijssen, B. O'Sullivan, and P. V. Hentenryck. Constraint programming meets machine learning and data mining. Dagstuhl Reports, 1(5):61--83, 2011.
[22]
M. Sanchez et al. Max-csp competition 2008: toulbar2 solver description. Proceedings of the 3rd International CSP Solver Competition, pages 63--70, 2008.
[23]
H. Santos, L. Ochi, E. Marinho, and L. Drummond. Combining an evolutionary algorithm with data mining to solve a single-vehicle routing problem. Neurocomputing, 70(1):70--77, 2006.
[24]
T. Schiex, H. Fargier, and G. Verfaillie. Valued constraint satisfaction problems: Hard and easy problems. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1, IJCAI'95, pages 631--637, 1995.
[25]
C. Solnon. Ants can solve constraint satisfaction problems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(4):347--357, 2002.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Data Mining in System-Level Design Space Exploration of Embedded SystemsEmbedded Computer Systems: Architectures, Modeling, and Simulation10.1007/978-3-030-60939-9_4(52-66)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GECCO '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
July 2015
1496 pages
ISBN:9781450334723
DOI:10.1145/2739480
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 July 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. association rules
  2. evolutionary computation
  3. weighted constraint satisfaction problems

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • Sciex

Conference

GECCO '15
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

GECCO '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 182 of 505 submissions, 36%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Data Mining in System-Level Design Space Exploration of Embedded SystemsEmbedded Computer Systems: Architectures, Modeling, and Simulation10.1007/978-3-030-60939-9_4(52-66)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media