- Urbanowicz, Ryan John, et al. "Role of genetic heterogeneity and epistasis in bladder cancer susceptibility and outcome: a learning classifier system approach." Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (2013).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Holland, J., and J. Reitman. "Cognitive systems based on adaptive agents." Pattern-directed inference systems (1978).Google Scholar
- Smith, Stephen Frederick. "A learning system based on genetic adaptive algorithms." (1980).Google Scholar
- Booker, Lashon Bernard. "Intelligent behavior as an adaptation to the task environment, University of Michigan." Ann Arbor, MI (1982).Google Scholar
- Holland, J. "Properties of the Bucket brigade", In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, 1-7 (1985) Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frey, Peter W., and David J. Slate. "Letter recognition using Holland-style adaptive classifiers." Machine Learning 6.2 (1991): 161-182. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Riolo, Rick L. "Lookahead planning and latent learning in a classifier system." Proceedings of the first international conference on simulation of adaptive behavior on From animals to animats. MIT Press, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wilson, Stewart W. "ZCS: A zeroth level classifier system." Evolutionary computation 2.1 (1994): 1-18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wilson, Stewart W. "Classifier fitness based on accuracy." Evolutionary computation 3.2 (1995): 149-175. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Holmes, John H. "A genetics-based machine learning approach to knowledge discovery in clinical data." Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium. American Medical Informatics Association, 1996.Google Scholar
- Stolzmann, Wolfgang. "An introduction to anticipatory classifier systems." Learning Classifier Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000. 175-194. 118 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wilson, Stewart W. "Classifiers that approximate functions." Natural Computing 1.2-3 (2002): 211-234. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kovacs, Tim. "A comparison of strength and accuracy-based fitness in learning classifier systems." School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK (2002).Google Scholar
- Kovacs, Tim. "What should a classifier system learn and how should we measure it?." Soft Computing 6.3-4 (2002): 171-182.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bernadó-Mansilla, Ester, and Josep M. Garrell-Guiu. "Accuracy-based learning classifier systems: models, analysis and applications to classification tasks." Evolutionary Computation 11.3 (2003): 209-238. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bull, Larry. "A simple accuracy-based learning classifier system." Learning Classifier Systems Group Technical Report UWELCSG03-005, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK (2003).Google Scholar
- Peñarroya, Jaume Bacardit. Pittsburgh genetic-based machine learning in the data mining era: representations, generalization, and run-time. Diss. Universitat Ramon Llull, 2004.Google Scholar
- Bacardit, Jaume, Edmund K. Burke, and Natalio Krasnogor. "Improving the scalability of rule-based evolutionary learning." Memetic Computing 1.1 (2009): 55-67.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Holmes, John H., and Jennifer A. Sager. "The EpiXCS workbench: a tool for experimentation and visualization." Learning Classifier Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007. 333-344. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Butz, Martin V. "Documentation of XCSFJava 1.1 plus visualization." MEDAL Report 2007008 (2007).Google Scholar
- Lanzi, Pier Luca, and Daniele Loiacono. "Classifier systems that compute action mappings." Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Franco, Mariá A., Natalio Krasnogor, and Jaume Bacardit. "Speeding up the evaluation of evolutionary learning systems using GPGPUs." Proceedings of the 12th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Urbanowicz, Ryan J., Ambrose Granizo-Mackenzie, and Jason H. Moore. "An analysis pipeline with statistical and visualization-guided knowledge discovery for michigan-style learning classifier systems." Computational Intelligence Magazine, IEEE 7.4 (2012): 35-45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Urbanowicz, Ryan, Ambrose Granizo-Mackenzie, and Jason Moore. "Instance-linked attribute tracking and feedback for michigan-style supervised learning classifier systems." Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Urbanowicz, Ryan J., Delaney Granizo-Mackenzie, and Jason H. Moore. "Using expert knowledge to guide covering and mutation in a michigan style learning classifier system to detect epistasis and heterogeneity." Parallel Problem Solving from Nature-PPSN XII. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. 266-275. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Iqbal, Muhammad, Will N. Browne, and Mengjie Zhang. "Extending learning classifier system with cyclic graphs for scalability on complex, large-scale boolean problems." Proceedings of the 15th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bacardit, Jaume, and Xavier Llora. "Large-scale data mining using genetics-based machine learning." Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 3.1 (2013): 37-61. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Urbanowicz, Ryan J., and Jason H. Moore. "ExSTraCS 2.0: description and evaluation of a scalable learning classifier system." Evolutionary Intelligence(2015): 1-28.Google Scholar
- Urbanowicz, Ryan J., and Jason H. Moore. "The application of michigan-style learning classifier systems to address genetic heterogeneity and epistasis in association studies." Proceedings of the 12th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wilson, Stewart W. "Get real! XCS with continuous-valued inputs." Learning Classifier Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000. 209-219. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stone, Christopher, and Larry Bull. "For real! XCS with continuous-valued inputs." Evolutionary Computation 11.3 (2003): 299-336. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Llora, Xavier, and Josep Maria Garrell i Guiu. "Coevolving Different Knowledge Representations With Fine-grained Parallel Learning Classifier Systems." GECCO. 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bacardit, Jaume, and Natalio Krasnogor. "A mixed discrete-continuous attribute list representation for large scale classification domains." Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Goldberg, David E. "E. 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning." Reading: Addison-Wesley (1990). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Urbanowicz, Ryan J., and Jason H. Moore. "Learning classifier systems: a complete introduction, review, and roadmap." Journal of Artificial Evolution and Applications 2009 (2009): 1. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bacardit, Jaume, et al. "Speeding-up pittsburgh learning classifier systems: Modeling time and accuracy." Parallel Problem Solving from Nature-PPSN VIII. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Introducing Rule-based Machine Learning: A Practical Guide
Recommendations
Introducing Rule-Based Machine Learning: Capturing Complexity
GECCO '16 Companion: Proceedings of the 2016 on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference CompanionGenetics-based machine learning for rule induction: state of the art, taxonomy, and comparative study
The classification problem can be addressed by numerous techniques and algorithms which belong to different paradigms of machine learning. In this paper, we are interested in evolutionary algorithms, the so-called genetics-based machine learning ...
Attention in Rule-Based Machine Learning: Exploiting Learning Classifier Systems' Generalization for Image Classification
GECCO '23 Companion: Proceedings of the Companion Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary ComputationDeep learning is a cutting-edge methodology that has been widely used in real-world applications to solve computer vision tasks. Deep learning models are typically seen as black boxes, opaque, and difficult to interpret. Recently, attention-based ...
Comments