skip to main content
10.1145/2740908.2742140acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploriometer: Leveraging Personality Traits for Coverage and Diversity Aware Recommendations

Published: 18 May 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Since the first introduced Collaborative Filtering Recommenders (CFR) there have been many attempts to improve their performance by enhancing the prediction accuracy. Even though rating prediction is the prevailing paradigm in CFR, there are other issues which have gained significant attention with respect to the content and its variety. Coverage, which constitutes the degree to which recommendations cover the set of available items, is an important factor along with diversity of the items proposed to an individual, often measured by an average dissimilarity between all pairs of recommended items. In this paper, we argue that coverage and diversity cannot be effectively addressed by conventional CFR with pure similarity-based neighborhood creation processes, especially in sparse datasets. Motivated by the need for including wider content characteristics, we propose a novel neighbor selection technique which emphasizes on variety in preferences (to cover polyphony in selection). Our approach consists of a new metric, named "Exploriometer", which acts as a personality trait for users based on their rating behavior. We favor users who are explorers in order to increase polyphony, and subsequently coverage and diversity; but we still select similar users when we create neighborhoods as a solid basis in order to keep accuracy levels high. The proposed approach has been experimented by two real-world datasets (MovieLens and Yahoo! Music ) with coverage, diversity and accuracy aware recommendations extracted by both traditional CFR and CFR enhanced with our neighborhood creation process. We also introduce a new metric, inspired by the Pearson Correlation Coefficient, to estimate the diversity of recommended items. The derived results demonstrate that our neighbor selection technique can enhance coverage and diversity of the recommendations, especially on sparse datasets.

References

[1]
Su, X., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. A survey of collaborative filtering techniques. . Advances in Artificial Intelligence. 2009.
[2]
Linden, G., B. Smith, and J. York. Amazon.com Recommendations: Item-to-Item Collaborative Filtering. IEEE Internet Computing. Jan.-Feb. 2003.
[3]
Sean M. McNee, J. R. and Konstan, J. A. Accurate is not always good: How accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In proceedings of the ACM WebKDD Workshop. 2006.
[4]
Bobadilla, J., Hernando, A., Ortega, F., & Bernal, J. A framework for collaborative filtering recommender systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 14609--14623. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.05.021. 2011.
[5]
Ge, M., Delgado-Battenfeld, C., & Jannach, D. Beyond accuracy: evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems (pp. 257--260). ACM. 2010, September.
[6]
Brynjolfsson, E., Hu. Y J., and Simester, D. Goodbye Pareto Principle, Hello Long Tail: The effect of Search Costs on the Concetration of Product Sales. Net Institute Working Paper. 2007.
[7]
Fleder, D. and Hosanagar, K. Blockbuster Culture's Next Rise or Fall: The Impact of Recommender Systems on Sales Diversity. Management Science, 55(5), pp. 697--712. 2009.
[8]
Ziegler, C., McNee, S. M., Konstan, J. A., and Lausen, G. Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web. 22--32. 2005.
[9]
Grar, Miha, et al. Data sparsity issues in the collaborative filtering framework. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. s.l. : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006.
[10]
Wilson, D. C., Smyth, B., & Sullivan, D. O. Sparsity reduction in collaborative recommendation: A case-based approach. International journal of pattern recognition and artificial intelligence, 17(05), 863--884. 2003.
[11]
Balabanovic, M., & Shoham, Y. Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation. . Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 66--72. 1997.
[12]
Billsus, D., & Pazzani, M. J. User modeling for adaptive news access. User modeling and user-adapted interaction, 10(2--3), 147--180. 2000.
[13]
Palit, G. P. and Taillie, C. Diversity as a concept and its measurements. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 77,379, 548--561. 1982.
[14]
Hyndman, Rob J. Koehler, Anne B. Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. International Journal of Forecasting: 679--688. 2006.
[15]
D. Goldberg, D. Nichols, B. M. Oki, and D. Terry. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Communications of the ACM. 1992, 35(12):61--70.
[16]
Rich, E. User modeling via stereotypes. Cognitive science. 1979, Vols. 3(4):329--354.
[17]
Desrosiers, Christian, and George Karypis. A comprehensive survey of neighborhood-based recommendation methods. Recommender systems handbook. Springer US, 2011, Vols. 107--144.
[18]
Koren, Y., & Bell, R. Advances in collaborative filtering. In Recommender Systems Handbook (pp. 145--186). Springer US, 2011.
[19]
Said, A., Jain, B. J., & Albayrak, S. Analyzing weighting schemes in collaborative filtering: cold start, post cold start and power users. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (pp. 2035--2040). ACM, 2012.
[20]
Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Borchers, A., & Riedl, J. An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (pp. 230--237). ACM, 1999.
[21]
Jannach, D., Lerche, L., Gedikli, F., & Bonnin, G. What recommenders recommend-an analysis of accuracy, popularity, and sales diversity effects. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (pp. 25--37). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.
[22]
A. Ghose, P. Ipeirotis, and B. Li. Designing ranking systems for hotels on travel search engines by mining user-generated and crowd-sourced content. Marketing Science. 2012.
[23]
Said, A., Kille, B., Jain, B. J., & Albayrak, S. Increasing diversity through furthest neighbor-based recommendation. . Proceedings of the WSDM, 12. 2012.
[24]
Said, A., Fields, B., Jain, B. J., & Albayrak, S. User-centric evaluation of a k-furthest neighbor collaborative filtering recommender algorithm. . In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 1399--1408). ACM, 2013.
[25]
Anderson, C. The long tail. New York: Hyperion. 2006.
[26]
Resnick, P., N. Iakovou, M. Sushak, P. Bergstrom, and J. Riedl. GroupLens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proceedings of the 1994 Computer Supported Cooperative Work Conference. 1994.
[27]
Sarwar, B., G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Item-based Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Algorithms. In Proc. of the 10th International WWW Conference,. 2001.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)A Closer-to-Reality Model for Comparing Relevant Dimensions of Recommender Systems, with Application to NoveltyInformation10.3390/info1212050012:12(500)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021
  • (2017)A Survey on Recommendation Methods Beyond AccuracyIEICE Transactions on Information and Systems10.1587/transinf.2017EDR0003E100.D:12(2931-2944)Online publication date: 2017
  • (2017)Learning to Diversify Recommendations Based on Matrix Factorization2017 IEEE 15th Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, 15th Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, 3rd Intl Conf on Big Data Intelligence and Computing and Cyber Science and Technology Congress(DASC/PiCom/DataCom/CyberSciTech)10.1109/DASC-PICom-DataCom-CyberSciTec.2017.26(68-74)Online publication date: Nov-2017

Index Terms

  1. Exploriometer: Leveraging Personality Traits for Coverage and Diversity Aware Recommendations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '15 Companion: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web
    May 2015
    1602 pages
    ISBN:9781450334730
    DOI:10.1145/2740908

    Sponsors

    • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 May 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. collaborative filtering systems
    2. coverage
    3. diversity
    4. neighbor selection

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    WWW '15
    Sponsor:
    • IW3C2

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)A Closer-to-Reality Model for Comparing Relevant Dimensions of Recommender Systems, with Application to NoveltyInformation10.3390/info1212050012:12(500)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021
    • (2017)A Survey on Recommendation Methods Beyond AccuracyIEICE Transactions on Information and Systems10.1587/transinf.2017EDR0003E100.D:12(2931-2944)Online publication date: 2017
    • (2017)Learning to Diversify Recommendations Based on Matrix Factorization2017 IEEE 15th Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, 15th Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, 3rd Intl Conf on Big Data Intelligence and Computing and Cyber Science and Technology Congress(DASC/PiCom/DataCom/CyberSciTech)10.1109/DASC-PICom-DataCom-CyberSciTec.2017.26(68-74)Online publication date: Nov-2017

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media