skip to main content
10.1145/2740908.2742718acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
other

Online Learning to Rank: Absolute vs. Relative

Published:18 May 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Online learning to rank holds great promise for learning personalized search result rankings. First algorithms have been proposed, namely absolute feedback approaches, based on contextual bandits learning; and relative feedback approaches, based on gradient methods and inferred preferences between complete result rankings. Both types of approaches have shown promise, but they have not previously been compared to each other. It is therefore unclear which type of approach is the most suitable for which online learning to rank problems. In this work we present the first empirical comparison of absolute and relative online learning to rank approaches.

References

  1. K. Hofmann, A. Schuth, S. Whiteson, and M. de Rijke. Reusing historical interaction data for faster online learning to rank for IR. In WSDM '13, pages 549--558, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. T. Joachims. Evaluating retrieval performance using clickthrough data. Text Mining, pages 79--96, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Langford and T. Zhang. The epoch-greedy algorithm for multi-armed bandits with side information. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 817--824, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. L. Li, W. Chu, J. Langford, and R. E. Schapire. A contextual-bandit approach to personalized news article recommendation. In WWW '10, pages 661--670, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. T. Qin, T.-Y. Liu, J. Xu, and H. Li. Letor: A benchmark collection for research on learning to rank for information retrieval. Information Retrieval, 13 (4): 346--374, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. F. Radlinski, M. Kurup, and T. Joachims. How does clickthrough data reflect retrieval quality? In CIKM '08, pages 43--52, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Schuth, K. Hofmann, S. Whiteson, and M. de Rijke. Lerot: An online learning to rank framework. In LivingLab '13, pages 23--26, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Online Learning to Rank: Absolute vs. Relative

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '15 Companion: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web
      May 2015
      1602 pages
      ISBN:9781450334730
      DOI:10.1145/2740908

      Copyright © 2015 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 May 2015

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • other

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader