skip to main content
10.1145/2744769.2747912acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Automating design-space exploration: optimal deployment of automotive SW-components in an ISO26262 context

Published: 07 June 2015 Publication History

Abstract

With a growing demand for complex, safety-critical features in automotive vehicles, functional safety is a key issues of automotive software development. Consequently, standards like ISO26262 propose methods and techniques for the systematic development of automotive software. Furthermore, the growing amount of functionality -- including active safety systems or automated driver assistance functions -- on the control of the vehicle dynamics and the correspondingly used more powerful electronic platforms requires methods supporting the development of systems in an increasingly complex design space. In this contribution, an approach is presented that supports the allocation of software functions to hardware elements in an automated fashion, respecting the separation constraints concerning assurances levels.

References

[1]
AUTOSAR. Technical Overview v2.2.2. Technical report, AUTOSAR Development Cooperation, 2011.
[2]
fortiss GmbH. AF3 website, 2015. http://af3.fortiss.org.
[3]
International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland. Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems, 2010.
[4]
International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. ISO 26262 -- Road vehicles -- Functional safety, 2011.
[5]
E. Kang, E. Jackson, and W. Schulte. An approach for effective design space exploration. In 16th Monterey FOCS Conference, pages 33--54, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011. Springer-Verlag.
[6]
A. Rajan and T. Wahl. Cesar: Cost-Efficient Methods and Processes for Safety-Relevant Embedded Systems. Springer London, Limited, 2013.
[7]
B. Schätz, F. Hölzl, and T. Lundkvist. Design-Space Exploration through Constraint-Based Model-Transformations. In 17th IEEE ECBS International Conference, pages 173--192, 2010.
[8]
SYSGO AG. Using PikeOS v3.3, 2005.
[9]
D. Tamas-Selicean. Design of Mixed-Criticality Applications on Distributed Real-Time Systems. PhD thesis, Technical University of Denmark, 2014.
[10]
S. Voss and B. Schätz. Deployment and Scheduling Synthesis for Mixed-Criticality Shared Memory Systems. In IEEE ECBS International Conference. IEEE, 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Multi-Objective Optimization for Safety-Related Available E/E Architectures Scoping Highly Automated Driving VehiclesACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems10.1145/358200428:3(1-37)Online publication date: 25-Jan-2023
  • (2022)Towards the reuse of physical models within the development life-cycle: a case study of Simulink modelsNOMS 2022-2022 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium10.1109/NOMS54207.2022.9789840(1-6)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2022
  • (2021)Design Space Exploration for Secure IoT Devices and Cyber-Physical SystemsACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems10.1145/343037220:4(1-24)Online publication date: 29-May-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Automating design-space exploration: optimal deployment of automotive SW-components in an ISO26262 context

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Conferences
          DAC '15: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Design Automation Conference
          June 2015
          1204 pages
          ISBN:9781450335201
          DOI:10.1145/2744769
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Sponsors

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 07 June 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions for this article.

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article

          Funding Sources

          Conference

          DAC '15
          Sponsor:
          DAC '15: The 52nd Annual Design Automation Conference 2015
          June 7 - 11, 2015
          California, San Francisco

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate 1,770 of 5,499 submissions, 32%

          Upcoming Conference

          DAC '25
          62nd ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
          June 22 - 26, 2025
          San Francisco , CA , USA

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
          Reflects downloads up to 26 Dec 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2023)Multi-Objective Optimization for Safety-Related Available E/E Architectures Scoping Highly Automated Driving VehiclesACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems10.1145/358200428:3(1-37)Online publication date: 25-Jan-2023
          • (2022)Towards the reuse of physical models within the development life-cycle: a case study of Simulink modelsNOMS 2022-2022 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium10.1109/NOMS54207.2022.9789840(1-6)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2022
          • (2021)Design Space Exploration for Secure IoT Devices and Cyber-Physical SystemsACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems10.1145/343037220:4(1-24)Online publication date: 29-May-2021
          • (2020)Towards Digital Twins for the Description of Automotive Software SystemsElectronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science10.4204/EPTCS.312.2312(20-28)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2020
          • (2020)Isolation Design Flow Effectiveness Evaluation Methodology for Zynq SoCsElectronics10.3390/electronics90508149:5(814)Online publication date: 15-May-2020
          • (2020)Modelling multi-criticality vehicular software systems: evolution of an industrial component modelSoftware and Systems Modeling10.1007/s10270-020-00795-5Online publication date: 30-Apr-2020
          • (2020)Hardware architecture exploration: automatic exploration of distributed automotive hardware architecturesSoftware and Systems Modeling10.1007/s10270-020-00786-6Online publication date: 12-Mar-2020
          • (2019)Optimization-Based Robust Architecture Design for Autonomous Driving SystemSAE Technical Paper Series10.4271/2019-01-0473Online publication date: 2-Apr-2019
          • (2019)Autonomous driving systems hardware and software architecture exploration: optimizing latency and cost under safety constraintsSystems Engineering10.1002/sys.2152823:3(327-337)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2019
          • (2018)Exploration of hardware topologies based on functions, variability and timingProceedings of the 21st ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings10.1145/3270112.3275333(145-149)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2018
          • Show More Cited By

          View Options

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media