skip to main content
10.1145/274644.274664acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

101 spots, or how do users read menus?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 January 1998Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.Card, S.K. User perceptual mechanisms in the search of computer command menus, in Proceedings of CI-H'82 (Gaithersburg MD, March 1982), ACM, 190-196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Fitts, P.I~~ The information capacity of the human motor system in eontroUing amplitude of movement Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 (1954), 381- 391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. 3.Cazf, ~V., and Kmeger, H. Ergonomie evaluation of user-interfaces by means of eye-movement data, in Work with Computers: Organisational, Management, Stress and Health Aspects, Smith, MJ., and Salvendy, G. (eds.), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1989, 659- 665. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Hendriekson, J.J. Performance, preference, and visual scan patterns on a menu-based system: Implications for interface design, in Proceedings of CH1'89 (Austin TX, April-May 1989), ACM Press, 217-222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Homof, A.J., and Kiems, D.E. Cognitive modelling reveals menu search is both random and systematic, in Proceedings of CI-I1'97 (Atlanta GA, March 1997), ACM Press, 107-114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.IVEE Corporation, Spotfire Pro 2.2. See http:/lwww.ivee, corn/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Jacob, tLJ.K. Eye tracking in advanced interface design, in Yirtual Environments and Advanced Interface Design, Barfield, W., and Furness, T.A. (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1995, 258-288. Available as http ://WWW.eecs.tufts.edu/-jacob/papers/barfield.html Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Knuth, D.E. The Art of Computer Programming, YoL 3: Sorting and Searching. Addison-Wesley, 1973. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.MacGregor, J., and Lee, E. Menu search: random or systematic? int. J. Man-Machine Studies 26 (1987), 627-631. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.McDonald, J.E., Stone, LD., and Liebolt, L.S. Searching for items in menus: The effects of organization and type of target, in Proceedings of HFS'83, Human Factors Society, 834-837.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Norman, K.L. The Psychology of Menu Selection: Designing Cognitive Control at the Human/Computer Interface. Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Rayner, K. Eye movements and cognitive processes in reading, visual search, and scene perception, in Eye Movement Research: Mechanisms, Processes and Applications, Findlay, J.M., Walker, R., and Kentridge, P,.W. (eds.), Elsevier Science B.V., 1995, 3-22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. 13.Shneiderman, B. Designing the User Interface. Addison-Wesley, 1992, 99-137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. 101 spots, or how do users read menus?

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '98: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          January 1998
          650 pages
          ISBN:0201309874

          Publisher

          ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

          United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 January 1998

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '98 Paper Acceptance Rate81of351submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader