skip to main content
10.1145/2746539.2746617acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Faster Canonical Forms for Primitive Coherent Configurations: Extended Abstract

Published:14 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Primitive coherent configurations (PCCs) are edge-colored digraphs that generalize strongly regular graphs (SRGs), a class perceived as difficult for Graph Isomorphism (GI). Moreover, PCCs arise naturally as obstacles to combinatorial divide-and-conquer approaches for general GI. In a natural sense, the isomorphism problem for PCCs is a stepping stone between SRGs and general GI. In his 1981 paper in the Annals of Math., Babai proposed a combinatorial approach to GI testing via an analysis of the standard individualization/refinement (I/R) technique and proved that I/R yields canonical forms of PCCs in time exp(~O(n1/2)). (The tilde hides polylogarithmic factors.) We improve this bound to exp(~O(n1/3)). This is faster than the current best bound, exp(~O(n1/2)), for general GI, and subsumes Spielman's exp(~O(n1/3)) bound for SRGs (STOC'96, only recently improved to exp(~O(n1/5)) by the present authors and their coauthors (FOCS'13)).

Our result implies an exp(~O(n1/3)) upper bound on the number of automorphisms of PCCs with certain easily described and recognized exceptions, making the first progress in 33 years on an old conjecture of Babai. The emergence of exceptions illuminates the technical difficulties: we had to separate these cases from the rest. For the analysis we develop a new combinatorial structure theory for PCCs that in particular demonstrates the presence of "asymptotically uniform clique geometries" among the constituent graphs of PCCs in a certain range of the parameters.

A corollary to Babai's 1981 result was an exp(~O(n1/2)) upper bound on the order of primitive but not doubly transitive permutation groups, solving a then 100-year old problem in group theory. An improved bound of exp(~O(n1/3)) (with known exceptions) follows from our combinatorial result. This bound was previously known (Cameron, 1981) only through the Classification of Finite Simple Groups. We note that upper bounds on the order of primitive permutation groups are central to the application of Luks's group theoretic divide-and-conquer methods to GI.

References

  1. L. Babai. Monte Carlo algorithms in graph isomorphism testing. Tech. Report 79--10, D' ep. Math. et Stat., Univ. de Montreal, 1979. Available at: http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/ laci/lasvegas79.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. L. Babai. On the complexity of canonical labeling of strongly regular graphs. SIAM J. Comput., 9(1):212--216, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Babai. On the order of uniprimitive permutation groups. Ann. of Math., 113(3):553--568, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. L. Babai. On the automorphism groups of strongly regular graphs I. In Proc. 5th ITCS, pages 359--368, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. Babai, X. Chen, X. Sun, S.-H. Teng, and J. Wilmes. Faster canonical forms for strongly regular graphs. In Proc. 54th FOCS, pages 157--166, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. Babai and P. Codenotti. Isomorphism of hypergraphs of low rank in moderately exponential time. In Proc. 49th FOCS, pages 667--676, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. Babai, W. M. Kantor, and E. M. Luks. Computational complexity and the classification of finite simple groups. In Proc. 24th FOCS, pages 162--171, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. Babai and E. M. Luks. Canonical labeling of graphs. In Proc. 15th STOC, pages 171--183, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. L. Babai and J. Wilmes. Asymptotic Delsarte cliques in distance-regular graphs. 2013. To appear: J. Algebr. Comb.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. L. Babai and J. Wilmes. Quasipolynomial-time canonical form for Steiner designs. In Proc. 45th STOC, pages 261--270, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J.-Y. Cai, M. Fürer, and N. Immerman. An optimal lower bound on the number of variables for graph identification. Combinatorica, 12(4):389--410, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. P. J. Cameron. Finite permutation groups and finite simple groups. Bull. London Math Soc., 13:1--22, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. X. Chen, X. Sun, and S.-H. Teng. Multi-stage design for quasipolynomial-time isomorphism testing of Steiner 2-systems. In Proc. 45th STOC, pages 271--280, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. Frucht. Herstellung von Graphen mit vorgegebener abstrakter Gruppe. Composition Math., 6:239--250, 1938.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. O. Goldreich, S. Micali, and A. Wigderson. Proofs that yield nothing but their validity or all languages in NP have zero-knowledge proof system. J. ACM, 38(1):691--729, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. G. Higman. Coherent configurations I. Geometriae Dedicata, 4:1--32, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. E. M. Luks. Isomorphism of graphs of bounded valence can be tested in polynomial time. J. Comput. System Sci., 25(1):42--65, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. K. Metsch. On a characterization of bilinear forms graphs. European Journal of Combinatorics, 20:293--306, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. G. L. Miller. Graph isomorphism, general remarks. In Proc. 9th STOC, pages 143--150, 1977. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A. Neumaier. Strongly regular graphs with smallest eigenvalue -m. Arch. Math., 33(4):392--400, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. D. A. Spielman. Faster isomorphism testing of strongly regular graphs. In Proc. 28th STOC, pages 576--584, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. B. Weisfeiler, editor. On Construction and Identification of Graphs, volume 558 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. B. Weisfeiler and A. A. Leman. A reduction of a graph to a canonical form and an algebra arising during this reduction. Nauchno-Tech. Info., 9:12--16, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. V. N. Zemlyachenko, N. M. Korneenko, and R. I. Tyshkevich. Graph isomorphism problem. Zap. Nauchn. Sem. (LOMI), 118:83--158, 215, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Faster Canonical Forms for Primitive Coherent Configurations: Extended Abstract

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      STOC '15: Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing
      June 2015
      916 pages
      ISBN:9781450335362
      DOI:10.1145/2746539

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 June 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      STOC '15 Paper Acceptance Rate93of347submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      STOC '24
      56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
      June 24 - 28, 2024
      Vancouver , BC , Canada

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader