skip to main content
10.1145/2750858.2805849acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing an emergency communication system for human and assistance dog partnerships

Published: 07 September 2015 Publication History

Abstract

In this research we developed an alarm system that enables assistance dogs to call for help on behalf of their vulnerable owners in an emergency, involving the end users (both assistance dogs and their owners) directly in the entire design process. Here we present a high-fidelity prototype of a user-friendly canine alarm system. In developing the system, we sought to understand the level of support required for a canine user to successfully interact with an interface, finding that the type of emergency a dog is faced with may vary widely and that consequently dogs may have to act on behalf of their assisted owners with varying degrees of autonomy. We also explored the process of conducting usability testing with both canine and human participants, seeking to identify where requirements of one species may overlap with, or diverge from, the other.

References

[1]
Assistance Dogs International, http://www.assistancedogsinternational.org/
[2]
Bozkurt, A., Roberts, D. L., Sherman, B. L., Brugarolas, R., Mealin, S., Majikes, J., Yang, P., & Loftin, R. (2014). Toward Cyber-Enhanced Working Dogs for Search and Rescue. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 29(6), 32--39.
[3]
Byrne, C., Kerwin, R., Zuerndorfer, J., Gilliland, S., Guo, Z., Jackson, M., & Starner, T. E. (2014). Two-Way Communication between Working Dogs and Their Handlers. IEEE Pervasive Computing, (2), 80--83.
[4]
Facchinetti, A., Sparacino, G., Guerra, S., Luijf, Y. M., DeVries, J. H., Mader, Cobelli, C. (2013). Real-Time Improvement of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Accuracy The smart sensor concept. Diabetes care, 36(4), 793--800.
[5]
Ferworn, A., Sadeghian, A., Barnum, K., Ostrom, D., Rahnama, H., & Woungang, I. (2007). Rubble search with canine augmentation technology. In System of Systems Engineering, 2007. SoSE'07. IEEE International Conference on (pp. 1--6). IEEE.
[6]
Hampson, B. A., & McGowan, C. M. (2007). Physiological responses of the Australian cattle dog to mustering exercise. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology, 4(01), 37--41.
[7]
Hauser, S., Wakkary, R., & Neustaedter, C. (2014). Understanding guide dog team interactions: design opportunities to support work and play. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (pp. 295--304). ACM.
[8]
Hermanides, J., Phillip, M., & DeVries, J. H. (2011). Current Application of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Treatment of Diabetes Pros and cons. Diabetes care, 34(Supplement 2), S197--S201.
[9]
Helton, W. S., Begoske, S., Pastel, R., & Tan, J. (2007). A case study in canine-human factors: a remote scent sampler for landmine detection. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 51, No. 10, pp. 582--586). Sage Publications.
[10]
Helton, W. S., & Helton, N. D. (2010). Physical size matters in the domestic dog's Canis lupus familiaris ability to use human pointing cues. Behavioural processes, 85(1), 77--79.
[11]
Igual, R., Medrano, C., & Plaza, I. (2013). Challenges, issues and trends in fall detection systems. Biomedical engineering online, 12(1), 66.
[12]
Jackson, M. M., Zeagler, C., Valentin, G., Martin, A., Martin, V., Delawalla, A., & Starner, T. (2013, September). FIDO-facilitating interactions for dogs with occupations: wearable dog-activated interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Symposium on Wearable Computers (pp. 81--88). ACM.
[13]
Kwong, M. J., & Bartholomew, K. (2011). "Not just a dog": an attachment perspective on relationships with assistance dogs. Attachment & human development, 13(5), 421--436.
[14]
Lemasson, G., Pesty, S., & Duhaut, D. (2013). Increasing communication between a man and a dog. In Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), 2013 IEEE 4th International Conference on (pp. 145--148). IEEE.
[15]
Lupton, D., & Seymour, W. (2000). Technology, selfhood and physical disability. Social Science & Medicine, 50(12), 1851--1862.
[16]
Mancini, C., van der Linden, J., Bryan, J., & Stuart, A. (2012). Exploring interspecies sensemaking: dog tracking semiotics and multispecies ethnography. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 143--152). ACM.
[17]
McNicholas, J., & Collis, G. M. (2000). Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: Robustness of the effect. British Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 61--70.
[18]
Mubashir, M., Shao, L., & Seed, L. (2013). A survey on fall detection: Principles and approaches. Neurocomputing, 100, 144--152.
[19]
Paldanius, M., Kärkkäinen, T., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Juhlin, O., & Häkkilä, J. (2011). Communication technology for human-dog interaction: exploration of dog owners' experiences and expectations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2641--2650). ACM.
[20]
Robinson, C., Mancini, C., van der Linden, J., Guest, C., Harris, R. (2014). Canine-Interface Design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM.
[21]
Rybarczyk, Y., Vernay, D., Rybarczyk, P., Lebret, M. C., Duhaut, D., Lemasson, G., & Lucidarme, P. (2013). COCHISE project: an augmented service dog for disabled people. Assistive Technology: From Research to Practice, 109--114.
[22]
Wells, D. L. (2007). Domestic dogs and human health: An overview. British journal of health psychology, 12(1), 145--156.
[23]
Winkle, M., Crowe, T. K., & Hendrix, I. (2012). Service dogs and people with physical disabilities partnerships: A systematic review. Occupational therapy international, 19(1), 54--66.
[24]
Wobber, V., Hare, B., Koler-Matznick, J., Wrangham, R., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Breed differences in domestic dogs'(Canis familiaris) comprehension of human communicative signals. Interaction Studies, 10(2), 206--224.
[25]
Zeagler, C., Gilliland, S., Freil, L., Starner, T., & Jackson, M. (2014). Going to the dogs: towards an interactive touchscreen interface for working dogs. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pp. 497--507.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Prototyping an Immersive Screen Interfaces for Dogs' to Control Screens in Their HomeProceedings of the International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction10.1145/3702336.3702342(1-15)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Message in a Bottle: Investigating Bioart Installations as a Transdisciplinary Means of Community EngagementProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642339(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)Digital Technology Supporting the Remote Human-Dog Interaction: Scoping ReviewAnimals10.3390/ani1304069913:4(699)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Designing an emergency communication system for human and assistance dog partnerships

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UbiComp '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
    September 2015
    1302 pages
    ISBN:9781450335744
    DOI:10.1145/2750858
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 September 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. animal-computer interaction
    2. assistance dogs
    3. assistive technologies
    4. canine design
    5. user-centred design

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    UbiComp '15
    Sponsor:
    • Yahoo! Japan
    • SIGMOBILE
    • FX Palo Alto Laboratory, Inc.
    • ACM
    • Rakuten Institute of Technology
    • Microsoft
    • Bell Labs
    • SIGCHI
    • Panasonic
    • Telefónica
    • ISTC-PC

    Acceptance Rates

    UbiComp '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 101 of 394 submissions, 26%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 764 of 2,912 submissions, 26%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)48
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Prototyping an Immersive Screen Interfaces for Dogs' to Control Screens in Their HomeProceedings of the International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction10.1145/3702336.3702342(1-15)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2024
    • (2024)Message in a Bottle: Investigating Bioart Installations as a Transdisciplinary Means of Community EngagementProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642339(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2023)Digital Technology Supporting the Remote Human-Dog Interaction: Scoping ReviewAnimals10.3390/ani1304069913:4(699)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2023
    • (2023)A biosemiotics perspective on dogs’ interaction with interfacesInteraction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial SystemsInteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial SystemsInteraction Studies10.1075/is.22027.man24:2(201-224)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2023
    • (2022)Raaz: A Transdisciplinary Exploration at the Intersection of Bioart, HCI, and Community EngagementFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2022.8309594Online publication date: 17-Mar-2022
    • (2022)Relevance, Impartiality, Welfare and Consent: Principles of an Animal-Centered Research EthicsFrontiers in Animal Science10.3389/fanim.2022.8001863Online publication date: 25-Apr-2022
    • (2022)Towards a monitoring and emergency alarm system activated by the barking of assistant dogsProceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction10.1145/3565995.3566038(1-10)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2022
    • (2022)A Critical Literature Review for Equal Participation in Human-Animal Interactions in DesignCompanion Publication of the 2022 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3500868.3559467(45-49)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2022
    • (2021)ACI 2021 Workshop: Technology and Working AnimalsProceedings of the Eight International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction10.1145/3493842.3493884(1-4)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2021
    • (2021)Perspectives of Bioartists and Community Lab Organizers on Working with Living OrganismsProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445060(1-15)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media