skip to main content
10.1145/2757290.2757297acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobihocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Smartphone Sensor Fusion based Activity Recognition System for Elderly Healthcare

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

With recent advancements in the tele-monitoring and ambient assisted living technology, human activity recognition (HAR) has proven enormously important in elderly healthcare. With the rapid increase in the use of smartphones embedded with a wide variety of latest locomotion sensors in our daily life, a new role for smartphones as the performance evaluator for physical activity recognition has emerged. HAR by using the fusion of smartphone sensors data is comparatively a new area for exploration. In this paper, we have evaluated different classification algorithms for recognition of eight physical activities performed by individuals using the smartphone tri-axial accelerometer, gyroscope and magnetometer sensors. Our analyses of collected data indicate that sensor combination improves the overall performance of the classifiers to the maximum compared to their individual performances especially for walking upstairs and downstairs activities. Moreover, we propose the use of sensor fusion for activity monitoring and diagnostic suitable for heart failure patients.

References

  1. Adil, M. K.; Muhammed, H. S.; and Seok, W. L. Exploratory data analysis of acceleration signals to select light-weight and accuratefeatures for real-time activity recognition on smartphones. Sensors, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 13099--13122, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Alvina, A.; and Muhammad, U. I. Activity recognition using smartphone sensors. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), Las Vegas, NA, USA, 11-14 January 2013; pp. 914--919.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Amarnag, S.; Alvin, R.; Jeff, B.; Dieter, F. Recognizing activities and spatial context using wearable sensors. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Corin, K. S. Activity recognition and step detection with smartphones: Towards terminal based indoor positioning system. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Sydney, Australia, 9-12 September 2012; pp. 2454--2459.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. David, A.; Alessandro, G.; Luca, O.; Xavier, P.; and Jorge, L. R. Human Activity Recognition on Smartphones using a Multiclass Hardware-Friendly Support Vector Machine. In International Workshop of Ambient Assisted Living (IWAAL), 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dean, M. K.; Michael, R. N.; Merryn, M.; Nigel, H. L.; and Branko, G. C. Implementation of a real-time human movement classifier using a triaxial accelerometer for ambulatory monitoring. Info. Tech. in Biomedicine, IEEE Trans. on, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 156--167, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Emmanuel, M. T.; Stephen, S. I.; William, H.; Kent, L.; Julie, W.; Abby, K..; and Robert, F. Real-Time recognition of physical activities and their intensities using wireless accelerometers and a heart rate monitor. In Proceedings of the 2007 11th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pp.37--40, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Figo, D.; Diniz, P.C.; Ferreira, D.R.; Cardoso, J.M.P. Preprocessing techniques for context recognition from accelerometer data. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2010, 14, 645--662. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Frank, J.; Mannor, S.; Precup, D. Activity Recognition with Mobile Phones. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2011, 6913, 630--633. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Garner, S. R. WEKA: The Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis. In Proceedings of the New Zealand Computer Science Research Students Conference, Hamilton, New Zealand, 18-21 April 1995; p. 5764.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jun, Y. Toward Physical Activity Diary : Motion Recognition Using Simple Acceleration Features with Mobile Phones. Data Processing, pp. 1--9, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Klasnja, P.; Pratt, W. Healthcare in the pocket: Mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions. J. Biomed. Inf. 2012, 45, 184--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lane, N.; Mohammod, M.; Lin, M.; Yang, X.; Lu, H.; Ali, S.; Doryab, A.; Berke, E.; Choudhury, T.; Campbell, A. BeWell: A Smartphone Application to Monitor, Model and Promote Wellbeing. In Proceedings of 5th International ICST Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, Dublin, Ireland, 23-26 May 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lau, S.L.; Konig, I.; David, K.; Parandian, B.; Carius-Dussel, C.; Schultz, M. Supporting patient monitoring using activity recognition with a smartphone. In Proceedings of the 2010 7th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS), York, UK, 19-22 September 2010; pp. 810--814Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lin, S.; Daqing, Z.; and Nan, L. Physical Activity Monitoring with Mobile Phones. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 6719, 2011, pp 104--111 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ling, B.; and Stephen, S. I.; "Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data," Pervasive Computing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3001, pp. 1--17, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Martin, H.; Bernardos, A.M.; Iglesias, J.; Casar, J.R. Activity logging using lightweight classification techniques in mobile devices. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2013, 17, 675--695. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Muhammad, S.; Stephan, B.; Ozlem, D. I.; Hans, S.; and Paul, J. M. H. Fusion of Smartphone Motion Sensors for Physical Activity Recognition. Sensors, 14, 10146--10176.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Nishkam, R.; Nikhil, D.; Preetham, M.; Michael, L. Activity Recognition from Accelerometer Data. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI/AAAI 2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Paul, L.; Jamie, A. W.; Holger, J.; Mathias, S.; Gerhard, T.; Amin A.; and Thad, S. Recognizing workshop activity using body worn microphones and accelerometers. International Conference Pervasive Computing, pp 18--22, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Seon-Woo, L.; and Kenji M. Activity and location recognition using wearable sensors. In IEEE Pervasive Computing, 1(3):24--32, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Sian, L. L.; Klaus, D. Movement Recognition using the Accelerometer in Smartphones. Communication, pp. 1--9, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sian, L. L.; Klaus, D. Movement recognition using the accelerometer in smartphones. In Proceedings of Future Network & MobileSummit 2010, Florence, Italy, June 2010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Simon, K.; Hristijan, G.; Matjaž, G.; Mitja, L. Efficient activity recognition and fall detection using accelerometers, in Evaluating AAL Systems Through Competitive Benchmarking. Springer, 2013, pp. 13--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Wanmin, W.; Sanjoy, D.; Ernesto, E. R.; Carlyn, P.; Gregory, J. N. Classification accuracies of physical activities using smartphone motion sensors. J. Med. Internet Res. 2012, 14, e130Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Yunus, E. U.; Ozlem, D. I.; Cem, E. User, Device and Orientation Independent Human Activity Recognition on Mobile Phones: Challenges and a Proposal. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication (UbiComp '13 Adjunct), New York, NY, USA, 8-12 September 2013; pp. 1427--1436. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Worldwide Mobile Phone Users: H1 2014 Forecast and Comparative Estimates. http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Smartphone-Users-Worldwide-Will-Total-175-Billion-2014/1010536Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Smartphone Sensor Fusion based Activity Recognition System for Elderly Healthcare

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MobileHealth '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Pervasive Wireless Healthcare
        June 2015
        66 pages
        ISBN:9781450335256
        DOI:10.1145/2757290

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 June 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate15of25submissions,60%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader