skip to main content
10.1145/2757710.2757711acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesperdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Construction on Display: Exploring the Use of Public Displays on Construction Sites

Published:10 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Construction sites are a common part of a city landscape, e.g., website Urban Toronto reports on 650+ registered works for the city of Toronto, while New London Architecture reports on 195 in London. Up until now there has been little research looking into how public displays are used at these settings. This paper reports on an exploratory study that looked into understanding the use of public displays on construction sites. By analyzing types of displays and their purpose on 38 construction sites located on 2 continents and 4 cities, I have uncovered 10 different types of displays that serve to fulfill 9 identified objectives. Based on this I provide 5 general design implications for pervasive public displays. Overall, the contribution of this paper lies in describing the use of public displays in a new context and providing design implications for them.

References

  1. Abedi, M., and Fathi, M.S., and Rawai, S. 2012. Cloud computing technology for collaborative information system in construction industry. In Proceedings of the 18th Innovation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: From Regional Development to World Economies (IBIMA'12). IBIMA, 593--602.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alt, F., Memarovic, N., Elhart, I., Bial, D., Schmidt, A., Langheinrich, M., Harboe, G., Huang, E.M., and Scipioni, M. P. 2011. Designing shared public display networks. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Pervasive computing (Pervasive'11). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 258--275. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Andoh, A.R., Su, X., and Cai, H. 2012. A Framework of RFID and GPS for Tracking Construction Site Dynamics. In Proceedings of Construction Research Congress 2012 (CRC). ASCE, 818--827. DOI= 10.1061/9780784412329.083Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Behzadan, A. H., Aziz, Z., Anumba, C. J., and Kamat, V. R. 2008. Ubiquitous location tracking for context-specific information delivery on construction sites. Automation in Construction 17, 6, 737--748.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Beyer, H., and Holtzblatt, K. 1998. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Churchill, E. F., Nelson, L., and Denoue, L. 2003. Multimedia fliers: Information sharing with digital community bulletin boards. In Proceedings of Communities and technologies (C&T'03). Springer, 97--117. DOI= 10.1007/978-94-017-0115-0_6 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Churchill, E.F., Nelson, L., and Hsieh, G. 2006. Café life in the digital age: augmenting information flow in a café-work-entertainment space. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 123--128. DOI=10.1145/1125451.1125481. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dalton, N., Marshall, P., and Dalton, R. 2013. Extending architectural theories of space syntax to understand the effect of environment on the salience of situated displays. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 73--78. DOI=10.1145/2491568.2491585. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fathi, M. S., Abedi, M., Rambat, S., Rawai, S., and Zakiyudin, M. Z. 2012. Context-aware cloud computing for construction collaboration. Journal of Cloud Computing, 2012, 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fortin, C., Neustaedter, C., and Hennessy, K. 2014. Posting for Community and Culture. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1425--1434. DOI=10.1145/2556288.2556970. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Giretti, A,, Carbonari, A., Naticchia, B., and De Grassi, M. 2009. Design and first development of an automated real-time safety management system for construction sites. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 15, 4: 325--336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Hanzl, M. 2007. Information technology as a tool for public participation in urban planning: a review of experiments and potentials. Design Studies 28, 3: 289--307.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Hatem, W.A. 2012. Comparing the Effectiveness of Face to Face and Computer Mediated Collaboration in Design. PhD Thesis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hosio, S., Goncalves, J., Kostakos, V., and Riekki, J. 2015. Crowdsourcing Public Opinion Using Urban Pervasive Technologies: Lessons From Real-Life Experiments in Oulu. Policy & Internet. Malden, Wiley. DOI=10.1002/poi3.90Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Izadi, S., Brignull, H., Rodden, T., Rogers, Y., and Underwood, M. 2003. Dynamo: a public interactive surface supporting the cooperative sharing and exchange of media. In Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 159--168. DOI=10.1145/964696.964714 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jones, M., Harwood, W., Bainbridge, D., Buchanan, G., Frohlich, D., Rachovides, D., Maxine, F., and Lalmas, M. 2008. "Narrowcast yourself": designing for community storytelling in a rural Indian context. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 369--378. DOI=10.1145/1394445.1394485 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jose, R., Pinto, H., Silva, B., and Melro, A. 2013. Pins and posters: Paradigms for content publication on situated displays. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 33, 2, 64--72. DOI= 10.1109/MCG.2013.16 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Koppel, T.M., Bailly, G., Müller, J., and Walter, R. 2012. Chained displays: configurations of public displays can be used to influence actor-, audience-, and passer-by behavior. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 317--326. DOI=10.1145/2207676.2207720 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. McDonald, D. W., McCarthy, J. F., Soroczak, S., Nguyen, D. H., and Rashid, A. M. 2008. roactive displays: Supporting awareness in fluid social environments. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 14, 4. DOI=10.1145/1314683.1314684 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Memarovic, N., Fatah gen. Schieck, A., Schnädelbach, H., Kostopoulou, E., North, S., and Ye, L. 2015. Capture the Moment: "In the Wild" Longitudinal Case Study of Situated Snapshots Captured Through an Urban Screen in a Community Setting. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 242--253. DOI=10.1145/2675133.2675165 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Merivirta, M. L., Mäkelä, T., Kiviniemi, M., Kähkönen, K., Sulankivi, K., and Koppinen, T. 2011. Exploitation of BIM based information displays for construction site safety communication. In CIB W099 Conference, Washington, DC. 24--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Munson, S. A., Rosengren, E., and Resnick, P. 2011. Thanks and tweets: comparing two public displays. In n Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 331--340. DOI=10.1145/1958824.1958875 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. New London Architecture. http://bit.ly/1ADW8Y3. Accessed December 20 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. New York City Department of Design and Construction. http://on.nyc.gov/1xLsUHe. Accessed December 24 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Offenhuber, D., and Schechtner, K. 2013. Accountability Technologies - Tools for Asking Hard Questions. Vienna: Ambra V.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Olander, S. 2006. External Stakeholder Analysis in Construction Project Management. PhD thesis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Reinwald, F., Berger, M., Stoik, C., Platzer, M., and Damyanovic, D. 2014. Augmented Reality at the Service of Participatory Urban Planning and Community Informatics -- a case study from Vienna. The Journal Of Community Informatics.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Rukzio, E., Müller, M., and Hardy, R. 2009. Design, implementation and evaluation of a novel public display for pedestrian navigation: the rotating compass. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 113--122. DOI=10.1145/1518701.1518722 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Salter, J.D., Campbell, C., Journeay, M., and Sheppard, S.R.J. 2009. The digital workshop: Exploring the use of interactive and immersive visualisation tools in participatory planning. Journal of environmental management 90, 6, 2090--2101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Scheible, J., and Ojala, T. 2009. MobiSpray: mobile phone as virtual spray can for painting BIG anytime anywhere on anything. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2009 Art Gallery (SIGGRAPH '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA. DOI=10.1145/1667265.1667271 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Schroeter, S. 2012. Engaging new digital locals with interactive urban screens to collaboratively improve the city. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 227--236. DOI=10.1145/2145204.2145239. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Spillane, J. P., Flood, M., Oyedele, L. O., von Meding, J. K., and Konanahalli, A. 2013. Urban high-density construction sites and their surrounding community. In Proceedings 29th Annual ARCOM Conference. ARCOM, 871--880.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Stadt Zürich Hochbaudepartement, http://bit.ly/1y5ohVR. Accessed December 17 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Talen, E. 2000. Bottom-up GIS. Journal of the American Planning Association 66, 3: 279--294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Taylor, N., and Cheverst, K. 2008. Exploring the use of non-digital situated displays in a rural community. In OZCHI 2008 Workshop on Public and Situated Displays to Support Communities.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Urbantoronto, http://urbantoronto.ca/map/. Accessed December 17 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Winter, M., 2013. Social Object Labels: supporting social object annotation with small pervasive displays. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops). IEEE, 489--494.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Xu, S., and Luo, H. 2014. The Information-related Time Loss on Construction Sites. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 11, 128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Construction on Display: Exploring the Use of Public Displays on Construction Sites

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          PerDis '15: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays
          June 2015
          268 pages
          ISBN:9781450336086
          DOI:10.1145/2757710
          • General Chairs:
          • Sven Gehring,
          • Antonio Krüger,
          • Program Chairs:
          • Florian Alt,
          • Nick Taylor

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 10 June 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          PerDis '15 Paper Acceptance Rate30of55submissions,55%Overall Acceptance Rate213of384submissions,55%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader