Abstract
Daily deal coupons have gained a prominent foothold on the web. The earliest and largest player is Groupon. Originally, Groupon deals were a mix of deals with a minimum requirement (MR) of coupon sales before a deal became effective and of deals without a minimum requirement (NMR). Eventually, Groupon stopped using MR deals. For Groupon and its retailer customers, might this decision have actually resulted in negative impacts for both parties (fewer coupons sold and lower revenue)? The structure of Groupon deals (including a “Facebook like” option) together with electronic access to the necessary data offered the opportunity to empirically investigate these questions. We analyzed relationships among MR, Facebook likes (FL), quantity of coupons sold, and total revenue, performing the analysis across the four largest retail categories. Using timestamped empirical data, we completed a propensity score analysis of causal effects. We find that the presence of MR increases Facebook likes, quantity of coupons sold, and total revenue at the time point when the MR is met and at subsequent 2-hour intervals over the horizon of deals. A key finding is that the initial differences observed when MR is met not only continue but also actually increase over the life of the deals.
- A. Benlian, R. Titan, and T. Hess. 2012. Differential effects of provider recommendations and consumer reviews in e-commerce transactions: An experimental study. Journal of Management Information Systems 29, 1, 237--272. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. A. W. Byers, M. Mitzenmacher, and G. Zervas. 2012. Daily deals: Prediction, social diffusion, and reputational ramifications. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 543--552. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Chevalier and D. Mayzlin. 2006. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research 43, 3, 345--354.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. K. Clemons, G. Gao, and L. M. Hitt. 2006. When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of the craft beer industry. Journal of Management Information Systems 23, 2, 149--171. Google ScholarDigital Library
- V. Dhar and E. A. Chang. 2009. Does chatter matter? The impact of user-generated content on music sales. Journal of Interactive Marketing 23, 4, 300--307.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Edelman, S. Jaffe, and S. D. Kominers. 2014. To Groupon or not to Groupon: The profitability of deep discounts. Working paper (available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1727508).Google Scholar
- R. Ferguson. 2008. Word of mouth and viral marketing: Taking the temperature of the hottest trends in marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing 25, 3, 179--182.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Godes and J. C. Silva. 2012. Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Science 31, 3, 448--473. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Hu, M. Shi, and J. Wu. 2013. Simultaneous versus sequential group-buying mechanisms. Management Science 59, 12, 2805--2822. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. C. Jensen. 1994. Self-interest, altruism, incentives, and agency theory. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 7, 2, 40--45.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. C. Jensen, and W. H. Meckling. 1994. The nature of man. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 7, 2, 4--19.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and É. Tardos. 2003. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 137--146. Google ScholarDigital Library
- X. Li and L. Wu. 2014. Herding and social media word-of-mouth: Evidence from Groupon. Working paper (available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2264411).Google Scholar
- Y. Liu. 2006. Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing 70, 3, 74--89.Google ScholarCross Ref
- X. Luo, M. Andrews, Y. Song, and J. Aspara. 2014. Group-buying deal popularity. Journal of Marketing 78, 2, 20--33.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Mithas and M. S. Krishnan. 2009. From association to causation via a potential outcome approach. Information System Research 20, 2, 295--313. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Mira. 1999. Distribution-free test for symmetry based on Bonferroni's measure. Journal of Applied Statistics 26, 8, 959--972.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. B. Peddibhotla and M. R. Subramani. 2007. Contributing to public document repositories: A critical mass theory perspective. Organization Studies 28, 3, 327--346.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Rosenbaum. 1999. Choice as an alternative to control in observational studies. Statistical Science 14, 3, 259--304.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Rui, Y. Liu, and A. B. Whinston. 2013. Whose and what chatter matters? The effect of tweets on movie sales. Decision Support Systems 55, 4, 863--870. Google ScholarDigital Library
- SimplyZesty. 2011. Case study: How coupons grew Facebook likes s by nearly 50,000. http://www.simplyzesty.com/social-media/case-study-how-coupons-grew-facebook-likes-by-nearly-50000/.Google Scholar
- M. Snyder and A. M. Omoto. 2000. Doing Good for Self and Society: Volunteerism and the Psychology of Citizen Participation. Routledge, New York, NY. 127--141.Google Scholar
- The Washington Times. 2009. Site leverages power of group purchases. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/08/site-leverages-power-of-group-purchases/.Google Scholar
- Yipit. 2011. Yipit's daily deal report: Industry revenue dips, Groupon gains share, and travel deals take off. http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/25/yipits-daily-deal-report-groupon-up-livingsocial-down-travel-deals-take-off/.Google Scholar
- Z. Zhang, C. Guo, and P. Goes. 2013. Product comparison networks for competitive analysis of online word-of-mouth. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 3, 4, 20. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Relationships Among Minimum Requirements, Facebook Likes, and Groupon Deal Outcomes
Recommendations
The groupon effect on yelp ratings: a root cause analysis
EC '12: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic CommerceDaily deals sites such as Groupon offer deeply discounted goods and services to tens of millions of customers through geographically targeted daily e-mail marketing campaigns. In our prior work we observed that a negative side effect for merchants ...
Groupon and Groupon Now: Participating Firm's Profitability Analysis
The business model of Groupon has been categorized by many to be a case of daily deals or discount offerings to consumers. It is static (not responsive to business fluctuations and demands) and operates in batch mode (period-based availability). "...
How e-WOM and local competition drive local retailers' decisions about daily deal offerings
Local retailers considering offering daily deals must take into account possible impacts of both electronic-word-of-mouth (e-WOM) and local competition. However, how e-WOM, local competition, and their interactions affect local retailers' decisions to ...
Comments