skip to main content
research-article

Relationships Among Minimum Requirements, Facebook Likes, and Groupon Deal Outcomes

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 September 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Daily deal coupons have gained a prominent foothold on the web. The earliest and largest player is Groupon. Originally, Groupon deals were a mix of deals with a minimum requirement (MR) of coupon sales before a deal became effective and of deals without a minimum requirement (NMR). Eventually, Groupon stopped using MR deals. For Groupon and its retailer customers, might this decision have actually resulted in negative impacts for both parties (fewer coupons sold and lower revenue)? The structure of Groupon deals (including a “Facebook like” option) together with electronic access to the necessary data offered the opportunity to empirically investigate these questions. We analyzed relationships among MR, Facebook likes (FL), quantity of coupons sold, and total revenue, performing the analysis across the four largest retail categories. Using timestamped empirical data, we completed a propensity score analysis of causal effects. We find that the presence of MR increases Facebook likes, quantity of coupons sold, and total revenue at the time point when the MR is met and at subsequent 2-hour intervals over the horizon of deals. A key finding is that the initial differences observed when MR is met not only continue but also actually increase over the life of the deals.

References

  1. A. Benlian, R. Titan, and T. Hess. 2012. Differential effects of provider recommendations and consumer reviews in e-commerce transactions: An experimental study. Journal of Management Information Systems 29, 1, 237--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. A. W. Byers, M. Mitzenmacher, and G. Zervas. 2012. Daily deals: Prediction, social diffusion, and reputational ramifications. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 543--552. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Chevalier and D. Mayzlin. 2006. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research 43, 3, 345--354.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. E. K. Clemons, G. Gao, and L. M. Hitt. 2006. When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of the craft beer industry. Journal of Management Information Systems 23, 2, 149--171. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. V. Dhar and E. A. Chang. 2009. Does chatter matter? The impact of user-generated content on music sales. Journal of Interactive Marketing 23, 4, 300--307.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. B. Edelman, S. Jaffe, and S. D. Kominers. 2014. To Groupon or not to Groupon: The profitability of deep discounts. Working paper (available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1727508).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. Ferguson. 2008. Word of mouth and viral marketing: Taking the temperature of the hottest trends in marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing 25, 3, 179--182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. D. Godes and J. C. Silva. 2012. Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Science 31, 3, 448--473. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Hu, M. Shi, and J. Wu. 2013. Simultaneous versus sequential group-buying mechanisms. Management Science 59, 12, 2805--2822. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. C. Jensen. 1994. Self-interest, altruism, incentives, and agency theory. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 7, 2, 40--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. M. C. Jensen, and W. H. Meckling. 1994. The nature of man. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 7, 2, 4--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and É. Tardos. 2003. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 137--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. X. Li and L. Wu. 2014. Herding and social media word-of-mouth: Evidence from Groupon. Working paper (available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2264411).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Y. Liu. 2006. Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing 70, 3, 74--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. X. Luo, M. Andrews, Y. Song, and J. Aspara. 2014. Group-buying deal popularity. Journal of Marketing 78, 2, 20--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. S. Mithas and M. S. Krishnan. 2009. From association to causation via a potential outcome approach. Information System Research 20, 2, 295--313. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Mira. 1999. Distribution-free test for symmetry based on Bonferroni's measure. Journal of Applied Statistics 26, 8, 959--972.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. N. B. Peddibhotla and M. R. Subramani. 2007. Contributing to public document repositories: A critical mass theory perspective. Organization Studies 28, 3, 327--346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. P. Rosenbaum. 1999. Choice as an alternative to control in observational studies. Statistical Science 14, 3, 259--304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. H. Rui, Y. Liu, and A. B. Whinston. 2013. Whose and what chatter matters? The effect of tweets on movie sales. Decision Support Systems 55, 4, 863--870. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. SimplyZesty. 2011. Case study: How coupons grew Facebook likes s by nearly 50,000. http://www.simplyzesty.com/social-media/case-study-how-coupons-grew-facebook-likes-by-nearly-50000/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M. Snyder and A. M. Omoto. 2000. Doing Good for Self and Society: Volunteerism and the Psychology of Citizen Participation. Routledge, New York, NY. 127--141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. The Washington Times. 2009. Site leverages power of group purchases. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/08/site-leverages-power-of-group-purchases/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Yipit. 2011. Yipit's daily deal report: Industry revenue dips, Groupon gains share, and travel deals take off. http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/25/yipits-daily-deal-report-groupon-up-livingsocial-down-travel-deals-take-off/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Z. Zhang, C. Guo, and P. Goes. 2013. Product comparison networks for competitive analysis of online word-of-mouth. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 3, 4, 20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Relationships Among Minimum Requirements, Facebook Likes, and Groupon Deal Outcomes

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
        ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems  Volume 6, Issue 3
        October 2015
        108 pages
        ISSN:2158-656X
        EISSN:2158-6578
        DOI:10.1145/2823403
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 September 2015
        • Accepted: 1 April 2015
        • Revised: 1 March 2015
        • Received: 1 March 2014
        Published in tmis Volume 6, Issue 3

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader