skip to main content
10.1145/2766462.2767697acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

adaQAC: Adaptive Query Auto-Completion via Implicit Negative Feedback

Published: 09 August 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Query auto-completion (QAC) facilitates user query composition by suggesting queries given query prefix inputs. In 2014, global users of Yahoo! Search saved more than 50% keystrokes when submitting English queries by selecting suggestions of QAC. Users' preference of queries can be inferred during user-QAC interactions, such as dwelling on suggestion lists for a long time without selecting query suggestions ranked at the top. However, the wealth of such implicit negative feedback has not been exploited for designing QAC models. Most existing QAC models rank suggested queries for given prefixes based on certain relevance scores.
We take the initiative towards studying implicit negative feed- back during user-QAC interactions. This motivates re-designing QAC in the more general "(static) relevance"(adaptive) implicit negative feedback? framework. We propose a novel adaptive model adaQAC that adapts query auto-completion to users' implicit negative feedback towards unselected query suggestions. We collect user-QAC interaction data and perform large-scale experiments. Empirical results show that implicit negative feedback significantly and consistently boosts the accuracy of the investigated static QAC models that only rely on relevance scores. Our work compellingly makes a key point: QAC should be designed in a more general framework for adapting to implicit negative feedback.

References

[1]
E. Adar, D. S. Weld, B. N. Bershad, and S. S. Gribble. Why we search: visualizing and predicting user behavior. In WWW, 2007.
[2]
Z. Bar-Yossef and N. Kraus. Context-sensitive query auto-completion. In WWW, 2011.
[3]
C. M. Bishop. Pattern recognition and machine learning, volume 1. 2006.
[4]
S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe. Convex optimization. 2009.
[5]
F. Cai, S. Liang, and M. de Rijke. Time-sensitive personalized query auto-completion. In CIKM, 2014.
[6]
S. Chaudhuri and R. Kaushik. Extending autocompletion to tolerate errors. In SIGMOD, 2009.
[7]
T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, R. L. Rivest, and C. Stein. Introduction to algorithms, volume 2. 2001.
[8]
H. Duan and B.-J. P. Hsu. Online spelling correction for query completion. In WWW, 2011.
[9]
D. Guan, S. Zhang, and H. Yang. Utilizing query change for session search. In SIGIR, 2013.
[10]
T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. The elements of statistical learning, volume 2. 2009.
[11]
K. Hofmann, B. Mitra, F. Radlinski, and M. Shokouhi. An eye-tracking study of user interactions with query auto completion. In CIKM, 2014.
[12]
Y. Hong, Q. Cai, S. Hua, J. Yao, and Q. Zhu. Negative feedback: the forsaken nature available for re-ranking. In COLING, 2010.
[13]
B.-J. P. Hsu and G. Ottaviano. Space-efficient data structures for top-k completion. In WWW, 2013.
[14]
S. Ji, G. Li, C. Li, and J. Feng. Efficient interactive fuzzy keyword search. In WWW, 2009.
[15]
J.-Y. Jiang, Y.-Y. Ke, P.-Y. Chien, and P.-J. Cheng. Learning user reformulation behavior for query auto-completion. In SIGIR, 2014.
[16]
S. R. Kairam, M. R. Morris, J. Teevan, D. J. Liebling, and S. T. Dumais. Towards supporting search over trending events with social media. In ICWSM, 2013.
[17]
M. Karimzadehgan and C. Zhai. Improving retrieval accuracy of difficult queries through generalizing negative document language models. In CIKM, 2011.
[18]
E. Kharitonov, C. Macdonald, P. Serdyukov, and I. Ounis. User model-based metrics for offline query suggestion evaluation. In SIGIR, 2013.
[19]
Y. Koren, R. Bell, and C. Volinsky. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer, 42(8), 2009.
[20]
A. Kulkarni, J. Teevan, K. M. Svore, and S. T. Dumais. Understanding temporal query dynamics. In WSDM, 2011.
[21]
Y. Li, A. Dong, H. Wang, H. Deng, Y. Chang, and C. Zhai. A two-dimensional click model for query auto-completion. In SIGIR, 2014.
[22]
Y. Li, X. Tao, A. Algarni, and S.-T. Wu. Mining specific and general features in both positive and negative relevance feedback. In TREC, 2009.
[23]
J. Luo, S. Zhang, and H. Yang. Win-win search: Dual-agent stochastic game in session search. In SIGIR, 2014.
[24]
Y. Ma and H. Lin. A multiple relevance feedback strategy with positive and negative models. PloS ONE, 9(8), 2014.
[25]
C. D. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schütze. Introduction to information retrieval, volume 1. 2008.
[26]
B. Mitra, M. Shokouhi, F. Radlinski, and K. Hofmann. On user interactions with query auto-completion. In SIGIR, 2014.
[27]
T. Miyanishi and T. Sakai. Time-aware structured query suggestion. In SIGIR, 2013.
[28]
K. P. Murphy. Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. 2012.
[29]
A. Nedić. Optimization. Technical Report, UIUC, 2011.
[30]
J. J. Rocchio. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. The SMART Retrieval System Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, 1971.
[31]
M. Shokouhi. Learning to personalize query auto-completion. In SIGIR, 2013.
[32]
M. Shokouhi and K. Radinsky. Time-sensitive query auto-completion. In SIGIR, 2012.
[33]
X. Wang, H. Fang, and C. Zhai. Improve retrieval accuracy for difficult queries using negative feedback. In CIKM, 2007.
[34]
X. Wang, H. Fang, and C. Zhai. A study of methods for negative relevance feedback. In SIGIR, 2008.
[35]
S. Whiting and J. M. Jose. Recent and robust query auto-completion. In WWW, 2014.
[36]
C. Xiao, J. Qin, W. Wang, Y. Ishikawa, K. Tsuda, and K. Sadakane. Efficient error-tolerant query autocompletion. VLDB, 6(6), 2013.
[37]
H. Yang, M. Sloan, and J. Wang. Dynamic information retrieval modeling. In SIGIR, 2014.
[38]
S.-H. Yang, B. Long, A. J. Smola, H. Zha, and Z. Zheng. Collaborative competitive filtering: learning recommender using context of user choice. In SIGIR, 2011.
[39]
W. Zhang and J. Wang. The study of methods for language model based positive and negative relevance feedback in information retrieval. In ISISE, 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Discriminator-Enhanced Knowledge-Distillation NetworksApplied Sciences10.3390/app1314804113:14(8041)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
  • (2022)DDEN: A Heterogeneous Learning-to-Rank Approach with Deep Debiasing Experts NetworkProceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3477495.3536320(3355-3359)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2022
  • (2022)FLAG: Towards Graph Query Autocompletion for Large GraphsData Science and Engineering10.1007/s41019-022-00182-87:2(175-191)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. adaQAC: Adaptive Query Auto-Completion via Implicit Negative Feedback

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGIR '15: Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
    August 2015
    1198 pages
    ISBN:9781450336215
    DOI:10.1145/2766462
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 09 August 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. implicit negative feedback
    2. query auto-completion

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    SIGIR '15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGIR '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 70 of 351 submissions, 20%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
    Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Discriminator-Enhanced Knowledge-Distillation NetworksApplied Sciences10.3390/app1314804113:14(8041)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
    • (2022)DDEN: A Heterogeneous Learning-to-Rank Approach with Deep Debiasing Experts NetworkProceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3477495.3536320(3355-3359)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2022
    • (2022)FLAG: Towards Graph Query Autocompletion for Large GraphsData Science and Engineering10.1007/s41019-022-00182-87:2(175-191)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2022
    • (2021)Examining Autocompletion as a Basic Concept for Interaction with Generative AIi-com10.1515/icom-2020-002519:3(251-264)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2021
    • (2021)Neural Instant Search for Music and PodcastProceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining10.1145/3447548.3467188(2984-2992)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2021
    • (2021)FINN: Feedback Interactive Neural Network for Intent RecommendationProceedings of the Web Conference 202110.1145/3442381.3450105(1949-1958)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2021
    • (2021)QueryBlazer: Efficient Query Autocompletion FrameworkProceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3437963.3441725(1020-1028)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2021
    • (2020)Personalized Prefix Embedding for POI Auto-Completion in the Search Engine of Baidu MapsProceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining10.1145/3394486.3403318(2677-2685)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2020
    • (2020)Personalized Query Auto-Completion for Large-Scale POI Search at Baidu MapsACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing10.1145/339413719:5(1-16)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2020
    • (2020)GFocus: User Focus-based Graph Query AutocompletionIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2020.3002934(1-1)Online publication date: 2020
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media