skip to main content
10.1145/2766462.2767712acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Incorporating Non-sequential Behavior into Click Models

Published: 09 August 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Click-through information is considered as a valuable source of users' implicit relevance feedback. As user behavior is usually influenced by a number of factors such as position, presentation style and site reputation, researchers have proposed a variety of assumptions (i.e.~click models) to generate a reasonable estimation of result relevance. The construction of click models usually follow some hypotheses. For example, most existing click models follow the sequential examination hypothesis in which users examine results from top to bottom in a linear fashion. While these click models have been successful, many recent studies showed that there is a large proportion of non-sequential browsing (both examination and click) behaviors in Web search, which the previous models fail to cope with. In this paper, we investigate the problem of properly incorporating non-sequential behavior into click models. We firstly carry out a laboratory eye-tracking study to analyze user's non-sequential examination behavior and then propose a novel click model named Partially Sequential Click Model (PSCM) that captures the practical behavior of users. We compare PSCM with a number of existing click models using two real-world search engine logs. Experimental results show that PSCM outperforms other click models in terms of both predicting click behavior (perplexity) and estimating result relevance (NDCG and user preference test). We also publicize the implementations of PSCM and related datasets for possible future comparison studies.

References

[1]
E. Agichtein, E. Brill, S. T. Dumais, and R. Ragno. Learning user interaction models for predicting web search result preferences. SIGIR'06, pages 3--10, Aug. 2006.
[2]
A. Broder. A taxonomy of web search. In SIGIR'02, volume 36, pages 3--10. ACM, 2002.
[3]
G. Buscher, S. White, Ryen W, and J. Huang. Large-scale analysis of individual and task differences in search result page examination strategies. In WSDM'12, pages 373--382. ACM, 2012.
[4]
O. Chapelle and Y. Zhang. A dynamic bayesian network click model for web search ranking. WWW'09, pages 1--10, Apr. 2009.
[5]
D. Chen, W. Chen, H. Wang, Z. Chen, and Q. Yang. Beyond ten blue links: enabling user click modeling in federated web search. WSDM'12, pages 463--472, Feb. 2012.
[6]
F. Chen, Y. Liu, Z. Dou, K. Xu, Y. Cao, M. Zhang, and S. Ma. Revisiting the evaluation of diversified search evaluation metrics with user preferences. In Information Retrieval Technology, pages 48--59. Springer, 2014.
[7]
A. Chuklin, P. Serdyukov, and M. De Rijke. Click model-based information retrieval metrics. In SIGIR'13, pages 493--502. ACM, 2013.
[8]
N. Craswell, O. Zoeter, M. Taylor, and B. Ramsey. An experimental comparison of click position-bias models. In WSDM'08, pages 87--94. ACM, 2008.
[9]
E. Cutrell and Z. Guan. What are you looking for?: an eye-tracking study of information usage in web search. In CHI 07, pages 407--416. ACM, 2007.
[10]
G. Dupret and C. Liao. A model to estimate intrinsic document relevance from the clickthrough logs of a web search engine. In WSDM'10, pages 181--190. ACM, 2010.
[11]
G. Dupret and B. Piwowarski. A user browsing model to predict search engine click data from past observations. SIGIR'08, pages 331--338, July 2008.
[12]
L. A. Granka, T. Joachims, and G. Gay. Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in www search. In SIGIR 04, pages 478--479. ACM, 2004.
[13]
F. Guo, C. Liu, and Y. M. Wang. Efficient multiple-click models in web search. WSDM'09, pages 124--131, Feb. 2009.
[14]
Q. Guo, D. Lagun, D. Savenkov, and Q. Liu. Improving relevance prediction by addressing biases and sparsity in web search click data. In WSCD'12, pages 71--75, 2012.
[15]
M. R. Gupta and Y. Chen. Theory and use of the EM algorithm. Now Publishers Inc, 2011.
[16]
J. Huang, R. W. White, and S. Dumais. No clicks, no problem: using cursor movements to understand and improve search. In CHI's 11, pages 1225--1234. ACM, 2011.
[17]
K. Jarvelin and J. Kekalainen. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of ir techniques. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 20(4):422--446, 2002.
[18]
L. Jie, S. Lamkhede, R. Sapra, E. Hsu, H. Song, and Y. Chang. A unified search federation system based on online user feedback. In SIGKDD'13, pages 1195--1203. ACM, 2013.
[19]
T. Joachims, L. A. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, and G. Gay. Accurately interpreting click through data as implicit feedback. SIGIR'05, pages 154--161, July 2005.
[20]
K. Klockner, N. Wirschum, and A. Jameson. Depth- and breadth-first processing of search result lists. CHI'04, pages 1539--1539, Apr. 2004.
[21]
Y. Liu, C. Wang, K. Zhou, J. Nie, M. Zhang, and S. Ma. From skimming to reading: A two-stage examination model for web search. In CIKM'14, pages 849--858. ACM, 2014.
[22]
L. Lorigo, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, T. Joachims, L. A. Granka, and G. Gay. The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using google. Information Processing and Management, 42(4):1123--1131, 2006.
[23]
R. Navalpakkam, Vidhya, S. Ravi, A. Ahmed, and A. Smola. Measurement and modeling of eye-mouse behavior in the presence of nonlinear page layouts. In WWW 13, pages 953--964, 2013.
[24]
K. Rayner. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 62(8):1457--1506, 2009.
[25]
D. D. Salvucci and J. H. Goldberg. Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. In Proceedings of the 2000 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications, pages 71--78. ACM, 2000.
[26]
M. Sanderson, M. L. Paramita, P. Clough, and E. Kanoulas. Do user preferences and evaluation measures line up? In SIGIR'10, pages 555--562. ACM, 2010.
[27]
C. Wang, Y. Liu, M. Zhang, S. Ma, M. Zheng, J. Qian, and K. Zhang. Incorporating vertical results into search click models. In SIGIR'13, pages 503--412. ACM, 2013.
[28]
K. Wang, N. Gloy, and X. Li. Inferring search behaviors using partially observable markov(pom) model. WSDM'10, pages 211--220, Feb. 2010.
[29]
D. Xu, Y. Liu, M. Zhang, S. Ma, and L. Ru. Incorporating revisiting behaviors into click models. In WSDM'12, pages 303--312. ACM, 2012.
[30]
W. Xu, E. Manavoglu, and E. Cantu-Paz. Temporal click model for sponsored search. In SIGIR'10, pages 106--113. ACM, 2010.
[31]
H. Yang, A. Mityagin, K. M. Svore, and S. Markov. Collecting high quality overlapping labels at low cost. In SIGIR'10, pages 459--466. ACM, 2010.
[32]
Y. Yue, R. Patel, and H. Roehrig. Beyond position bias: examining result attractiveness as a source of presentation bias in click through data. WWW'10, pages 1011--1018, Apr. 2010.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Probabilistic graph model and neural network perspective of click models for web searchKnowledge and Information Systems10.1007/s10115-024-02145-z66:10(5829-5873)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2024
  • (2023)An F-shape Click Model for Information Retrieval on Multi-block Mobile PagesProceedings of the Sixteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3539597.3570365(1057-1065)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2023
  • (2023)Contrasting Neural Click Models and Pointwise IPS RankersAdvances in Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-031-28244-7_26(409-425)Online publication date: 17-Mar-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Incorporating Non-sequential Behavior into Click Models

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGIR '15: Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
    August 2015
    1198 pages
    ISBN:9781450336215
    DOI:10.1145/2766462
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 09 August 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Badges

    • Honorable Mention

    Author Tags

    1. click model
    2. eye-tracking
    3. non-sequential behavior

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Tsinghua-Samsung Joint Lab Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program
    • National Key Basic Research Program
    • Natural Science Foundation of China

    Conference

    SIGIR '15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGIR '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 70 of 351 submissions, 20%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Probabilistic graph model and neural network perspective of click models for web searchKnowledge and Information Systems10.1007/s10115-024-02145-z66:10(5829-5873)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2024
    • (2023)An F-shape Click Model for Information Retrieval on Multi-block Mobile PagesProceedings of the Sixteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3539597.3570365(1057-1065)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2023
    • (2023)Contrasting Neural Click Models and Pointwise IPS RankersAdvances in Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-031-28244-7_26(409-425)Online publication date: 17-Mar-2023
    • (2023)Formally Modeling Users in Information RetrievalA Behavioral Economics Approach to Interactive Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-031-23229-9_2(23-64)Online publication date: 18-Feb-2023
    • (2022)A Cooperative Neural Information Retrieval Pipeline with Knowledge Enhanced Automatic Query ReformulationProceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3488560.3498516(553-561)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2022
    • (2022)Global or Local: Constructing Personalized Click Models for Web SearchProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202210.1145/3485447.3511950(213-223)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2022
    • (2022)Understanding the role of human-inspired heuristics for retrieval modelsFrontiers of Computer Science: Selected Publications from Chinese Universities10.1007/s11704-020-0016-y16:1Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022
    • (2022)Leveraging Document-Level and Query-Level Passage Cumulative Gain for Document RankingJournal of Computer Science and Technology10.1007/s11390-022-2031-y37:4(814-838)Online publication date: 30-Jul-2022
    • (2021)Cross-Positional Attention for Debiasing ClicksProceedings of the Web Conference 202110.1145/3442381.3450098(788-797)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2021
    • (2021)Topic-enhanced knowledge-aware retrieval model for diverse relevance estimationProceedings of the Web Conference 202110.1145/3442381.3449943(756-767)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media