skip to main content
10.1145/2766462.2767761acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Information Retrieval as Card Playing: A Formal Model for Optimizing Interactive Retrieval Interface

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose a novel formal model for optimizing interactive information retrieval interfaces. To model interactive retrieval in a general way, we frame the task of an interactive retrieval system as to choose a sequence of interface cards to present to the user. At each interaction lap, the system's goal is to choose an interface card that can maximize the expected gain of relevant information for the user while minimizing the effort of the user with consideration of the user's action model and any desired constraints on the interface card. We show that such a formal interface card model can not only cover the Probability Ranking Principle for Interactive Information Retrieval as a special case by making multiple simplification assumptions, but also be used to derive a novel formal interface model for adaptively optimizing navigational interfaces in a retrieval system. Experimental results show that the proposed model is effective in automatically generating adaptive navigational interfaces, which outperform the baseline pre-designed static interfaces.

References

  1. G. Amati and C. J. Van Rijsbergen. Probabilistic models of information retrieval based on measuring the divergence from randomness. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 20(4):357--389, Oct. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. Azzopardi. Modelling interaction with economic models of search. In SIGIR '14, pages 3--12, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Basu Roy, H. Wang, G. Das, U. Nambiar, and M. Mohania. Minimum-effort driven dynamic faceted search in structured databases. In CIKM '08, pages 13--22, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. N. J. Belkin, R. N. Oddy, and H. M. Brooks. Ask for information retrieval: Part I.: Background and theory. Journal of Documentation, 38(2):61--71, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. I. Campbell and K. V. Rijsbergen. The ostensive model of developing information needs. In CoLIS 2, pages 251--268, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. H. Fang and C. Zhai. An exploration of axiomatic approaches to information retrieval. In SIGIR '05, pages 480--487, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. N. Fuhr. Optimum polynomial retrieval functions based on the probability ranking principle. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 7(3):183--204, July 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. N. Fuhr. A probability ranking principle for interactive information retrieval. Information Retrieval, 11(3):251--265, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. A. Hearst. Search User Interfaces. Cambridge University Press, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. D. Hiemstra and W. Kraaij. Twenty-one at TREC-7: ad-hoc and cross-language track. In TREC-7, volume 500--242, pages 227--238, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. Ingwersen. Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: elements of a cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation, 52:3--50, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. X. Jin, M. Sloan, and J. Wang. Interactive exploratory search for multi page search results. In WWW '13, pages 655--666, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Kashyap, V. Hristidis, and M. Petropoulos. FACeTOR: Cost-driven exploration of faceted query results. In CIKM '10, pages 719--728, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. T.-Y. Liu. Learning to rank for information retrieval. Found. Trends Inf. Retr., 3(3):225--331, Mar. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Luo, S. Zhang, and H. Yang. Win-win search: Dual-agent stochastic game in session search. In SIGIR '14, pages 587--596, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. McFadden and K. Train. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15(5):447--470, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. J. M. Ponte and W. B. Croft. A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In SIGIR '98, pages 275--281, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. E. Robertson. The probability ranking principle in IR. Journal of Documentation, 33(4):294--304, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. S. E. Robertson and K. S. Jones. Relevance weighting of search terms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(3):129--146, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. G. Salton, A. Wong, and C. S. Yang. A vector space model for automatic indexing. Commun. ACM, 18(11):613--620, Nov. 1975. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. H. Turtle and W. B. Croft. Evaluation of an inference network-based retrieval model. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 9(3):187--222, July 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. C. Zhai. Statistical language models for information retrieval a critical review. Found. Trends Inf. Retr., 2(3):137--213, Mar. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Information Retrieval as Card Playing: A Formal Model for Optimizing Interactive Retrieval Interface

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '15: Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
      August 2015
      1198 pages
      ISBN:9781450336215
      DOI:10.1145/2766462

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 August 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGIR '15 Paper Acceptance Rate70of351submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader