skip to main content
10.1145/2768510.2768532acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagese-energyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Multi-Factor Battery Cycle Life Prediction Methodology for Optimal Battery Management

Published: 14 July 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Affordability of battery energy storage critically depends on low capital cost and high lifespan. Estimating battery life-span, and optimising battery management to increase it, is difficult given the associated complex, multi-factor ageing process. In this paper we present a battery life prediction methodology tailored towards operational optimisation of battery management. The methodology is able to consider a multitude of dynamically changing cycling parameters. For lithium-ion (Li-ion) cells, the methodology has been tailored to consider five operational factors: charging and discharging currents, minimum and maximum cycling limits, and operating temperature. These are captured within four independent models, which are tuned using experimental battery data. Incorporation of dynamically changing factors is done using rainflow counting and discretisation. The resulting methodology is designed for solving optimal battery operation problems.
Implementation of the methodology is presented for two case studies: a smartphone battery, and a household with battery storage alongside solar generation. For a smartphone that charges daily, our analysis finds that the battery life can be more than doubled if the maximum charging limit is chosen strategically. And for the battery supporting domestic solar, it is found that the impact of large daily cycling outweighs that of small more frequent cycles. This suggests that stationary Li-ion batteries may be well suited to provide ancillary services as a secondary function.
The developed methodology and demonstrated use cases represent a key step towards maximising the cost-benefit of Li-ion batteries for any given application.

References

[1]
M. Broussely, P. Biensan, F. Bonhomme, P. Blanchard, S. Herreyre, K. Nechev, and R. Staniewicz. Main ageing mechanisms in li-ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 146:90--96, 2005.
[2]
N. A. Chaturvedi, R. Klein, J. Christensen, J. Ahmed, and A. Kojic. Algorithms for advanced battery-management systems. Control Systems, IEEE, 30(3):49--68, 2010.
[3]
M. Ecker, J. B. Gerschler, J. Vogel, S. Käbitz, F. Hust, P. Dechent, and D. U. Sauer. Development of a lifetime prediction model for lithium-ion batteries based on extended accelerated aging test data. Journal of Power Sources, 215:248--257, 2012.
[4]
M. Ecker, N. Nieto, S. Kaebitz, J. Schmalstieg, H. Blanke, A. Warnecke, and D. U. Sauer. Calendar and cycle life study of Li(NiMnCo)O2-based 18650 lithiumion batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 248:839--851, Feb. 2014.
[5]
Google. Nexus 5. http://www.google.com/nexus/5.
[6]
GSMArena. LG Nexus 5 battery life test. http://blog.gsmarena.com/nexus-5-grinds-through-our-battery-test-routine.
[7]
Lux Research. Energy storage market rises to$50 billion in 2020, amid dramatic changes. http://www.luxresearchinc.com/news-and-events/press-releases/read/energy-storage-market-rises-50-billion-2020-amid-dramatic.
[8]
C. McInnes and P. Meehan. Equivalence of four-point and three-point rainflow cycle counting algorithms. International Journal of Fatigue, 30(3):547--559, 2008.
[9]
V. Muenzel, J. de Hoog, I. Mareels, A. Vishwanath, S. Kalyanaraman, and A. Gort. PV generation and demand mismatch: Evaluating the potential of residential storage. In Proceedings of IEEE PES ISGT 2015; to appear.
[10]
V. Muenzel, I. Mareels, J. de Hoog, A. Vishwanath, and S. Kalyanaraman. Affordable batteries for green energy are closer than we think. https://theconversation.com/affordable-batteries-for-green-energy-are-closer-than-we-think-28772.
[11]
S. S. Ng, Y. Xing, and K. L. Tsui. A naive bayes model for robust remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery. Applied Energy, 118:114--123, 2014.
[12]
A. Nuhic, T. Terzimehic, T. Soczka-Guth, M. Buchholz, and K. Dietmayer. Health diagnosis and remaining useful life prognostics of lithium-ion batteries using data-driven methods. Journal of Power Sources, 239:680--688, 2013.
[13]
N. Omar, M. A. Monem, Y. Firouz, J. Salminen, J. Smekens, O. Hegazy, H. Gaulous, G. Mulder, P. Van den Bossche, T. Coosemans, and J. Van Mierlo. Lithium iron phosphate based battery - Assessment of the aging parameters and development of cycle life model. Applied Energy, 113:1575--1585, Jan. 2014.
[14]
Panasonic. NCA103450 data sheet. https://www.master-instruments.com.au/cgi/ajax/get_file/63186/1.
[15]
The Boston Consulting Group. Batteries for electric cars: Challenges, opportunities and the outlook to 2020. https://www.bcg.com/documents/file36615.pdf

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Sizing of Battery Energy Storage Systems for Firming PV Power including Aging AnalysisEnergies10.3390/en1706148517:6(1485)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Joint Sizing Optimization Method of PVs, Hybrid Energy Storage Systems, and Power Flow Controllers for Flexible Traction Substations in Electric RailwaysIEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy10.1109/TSTE.2023.333134615:2(1210-1223)Online publication date: Apr-2024
  • (2024)Continuous Approximate Dynamic Programming Algorithm to Promote Multiple Battery Energy Storage Lifespan Benefit in Real-Time SchedulingIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid10.1109/TSG.2024.342332115:6(5744-5760)Online publication date: Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A Multi-Factor Battery Cycle Life Prediction Methodology for Optimal Battery Management

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    e-Energy '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Sixth International Conference on Future Energy Systems
    July 2015
    334 pages
    ISBN:9781450336093
    DOI:10.1145/2768510
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 July 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. battery value optimisation
    2. cell degradation
    3. cycle life prediction
    4. lithium-ion (li-ion) batteries

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    e-Energy'15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    e-Energy '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 20 of 85 submissions, 24%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 160 of 446 submissions, 36%

    Upcoming Conference

    E-Energy '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)133
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16
    Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Sizing of Battery Energy Storage Systems for Firming PV Power including Aging AnalysisEnergies10.3390/en1706148517:6(1485)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Joint Sizing Optimization Method of PVs, Hybrid Energy Storage Systems, and Power Flow Controllers for Flexible Traction Substations in Electric RailwaysIEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy10.1109/TSTE.2023.333134615:2(1210-1223)Online publication date: Apr-2024
    • (2024)Continuous Approximate Dynamic Programming Algorithm to Promote Multiple Battery Energy Storage Lifespan Benefit in Real-Time SchedulingIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid10.1109/TSG.2024.342332115:6(5744-5760)Online publication date: Nov-2024
    • (2024)Factoring Electrochemical and Full-Lifecycle Aging Modes of Battery Participating in Energy and Transportation SystemsIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid10.1109/TSG.2024.340254815:5(4932-4945)Online publication date: Sep-2024
    • (2024)Energy Optimization Strategies for Zero Emission Heavy Duty Vehicles2024 UKACC 14th International Conference on Control (CONTROL)10.1109/CONTROL60310.2024.10531847(213-218)Online publication date: 10-Apr-2024
    • (2023)Profitability of Alternative Battery Operation Strategies in Photovoltaic Self-Consumption Systems under Current Regulatory Framework and Electricity Prices in SpainEnergies10.3390/en1621737516:21(7375)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Battery Swapping Station Service in a Smart Microgrid: A Multi-Method Simulation Performance AnalysisEnergies10.3390/en1618657616:18(6576)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Battery Energy Storage Capacity Estimation for Microgrids Using Digital Twin ConceptEnergies10.3390/en1612454016:12(4540)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2023
    • (2023)A MILP-Based Battery Degradation Model for Economic Scheduling of Power SystemIEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy10.1109/TSTE.2022.323237014:2(1000-1009)Online publication date: Apr-2023
    • (2023)Linearizing Battery Degradation for Health-Aware Vehicle Energy ManagementIEEE Transactions on Power Systems10.1109/TPWRS.2022.321798138:5(4890-4899)Online publication date: Sep-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media