research-article

Anonymous Quorans are still Quorans, just anonymous

Authors:

Myriam LewkowiczAuthors Info & Claims

C&T '15: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies

Pages 9 - 18

https://doi.org/10.1145/2768545.2768551

Published: 27 June 2015 Publication History

Abstract

This article presents a study that investigates how anonymity influences user participation in an online question-and-answer platform (Quora). The study is one step in identifying hypotheses that can be used to address a research and design issue concerning the role of anonymity in online participation, particularly among older informal caregivers. We present here a model that describes the factors that influence participation, which we based on the literature. These factors were used when analyzing the answers to questions in the health category on Quora. The results of this study complement an earlier study that we conducted on YouTube comments. On Quora, there was only one significant difference between anonymous and non-anonymous answers: with anonymous answers, social appreciation correlated with the answer's length.

References

[1]

J. Ahn, C. Weng, and B. S. Butler. The dynamics of open, peer-to-peer learning: What factors influence participation in the p2p university? In System Sciences (HICSS), 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on, pages 3098--3107, Jan 2013.

Digital Library

[2]

J. Arguello, B. S. Butler, E. Joyce, R. Kraut, K. S. Ling, C. Rosé, and X. Wang. Talk to me: Foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '06, pages 959--968, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.

Digital Library

[3]

R. Bodle. The ethics of online anonymity or zuckerberg vs. "moot". SIGCAS Comput. Soc., 43(1):22--35, May 2013.

Digital Library

[4]

N. Bramley. Pronouns of Politics: The Use of Pronouns in the Construction of 'self' and 'other' in Political Interviews. Australian National University, 2001.

[5]

M. Burke, E. Joyce, T. Kim, V. Anand, and R. Kraut. Introductions and Requests: Rhetorical Strategies That Elicit Response in Online Communities. 2007.

[6]

M. Burke and R. Kraut. Mind your Ps and Qs: the impact of politeness and rudeness in online communities. In Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 281--284, 2008.

Digital Library

[7]

V. H.-H. Chen, H. B.-L. Duh, and C. W. Ng. Players who play to make others cry: The influence of anonymity and immersion. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Enterntainment Technology, ACE '09, pages 341--344, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.

Digital Library

[8]

A. Chmiel, P. Sobkowicz, J. Sienkiewicz, G. Paltoglou, K. Buckley, M. Thelwall, and J. A. Hołyst. Negative emotions boost user activity at {BBC} forum. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 390(16):2936--2944, 2011.

[9]

U. Cress. Why member portraits can undermine participation. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years!, CSCL '05, pages 86--90. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 2005.

Digital Library

[10]

M. Edman and B. Yener. On anonymity in an electronic society: A survey of anonymous communication systems. ACM Comput. Surv., 42(1):5:1--5:35, Dec. 2009.

Digital Library

[11]

R. Farzan, L. A. Dabbish, R. E. Kraut, and T. Postmes. Increasing commitment to online communities by designing for social presence. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '11, pages 321--330, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.

Digital Library

[12]

F. M. Harper, D. Frankowski, S. Drenner, Y. Ren, S. Kiesler, L. Terveen, R. Kraut, and J. Riedl. Talk amongst yourselves: Inviting users to participate in online conversations.

[13]

R. Kang, S. Brown, and S. Kiesler. Why do people seek anonymity on the internet?: Informing policy and design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '13, pages 2657--2666, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.

Digital Library

[14]

P. G. Kilner and C. M. Hoadley. Anonymity options and professional participation in an online community of practice. In Proceedings of th 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years!, CSCL '05, pages 272--280. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 2005.

Digital Library

[15]

R. E. Kraut and A. T. Fiore. The role of founders in building online groups. In CSCW, pages 722--732, 2014.

Digital Library

[16]

N. Lapidot-Lefler and A. Barak. Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2):434--443, 2012.

Digital Library

[17]

S. Levmore, S. Levmore, and M. Nussbaum. THE OFFENSIVE INTERNET. Harvard University Press, 2010.

[18]

K. Ling, G. Beenen, P. Ludford, X. Wang, K. Chang, X. Li, D. Cosley, D. Frankowski, L. Terveen, A. M. Rashid, P. Resnick, and R. Kraut. Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4):00--00, 2005.

[19]

B. Nonnecke and J. Preece. Why lurkers lurk abstract.

[20]

E. Omernick and S. O. Sood. The impact of anonymity in online communities. In International Conference on Social Computing, SocialCom 2013, SocialCom/PASSAT/BigData/EconCom/BioMedCom 2013, Washington, DC, USA, 8--14 September, 2013, pages 526--535, 2013.

Digital Library

[21]

Pew Research Center. The Web at 25 in the U.S., February 2014.

[22]

T. Postmes, R. Spears, and M. Lea. Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1):3, 2002.

[23]

J. Preece and B. Shneiderman. The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(1):13--32, 2009.

[24]

J. J. Preece, B. Nonnecke, and D. Andrews. The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(2):201--223, 2004.

[25]

S. A. Rains. The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication: A test of two competing hypotheses. Communication Research, 34(1):100--125, 2007.

[26]

Y. Ren, R. Kraut, and S. Kiesler. Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization studies, 28(3):377--408, 2007.

[27]

A. Santana. Civility, anonymity and the breakdown of a new public sphere. 2012.

[28]

N. Sharma, B. S. Butler, J. Irwin, and H. Spallek. Emphasizing social features in information portals: Effects on new member engagement. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11):2106--2120, 2011.

Digital Library

[29]

Y.-C. Shiue, C.-M. Chiu, and C.-C. Chang. Exploring and mitigating social loafing in online communities. Comput. Hum. Behav., 26(4):768--777, July 2010.

Digital Library

[30]

L. Sproull and S. Kiesler. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management science, 32(11):1492--1512, 1986.

Digital Library

[31]

J. Suler. The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 7(3):321--326, 2004.

[32]

Y. R. Tausczik, L. A. Dabbish, and R. E. Kraut. Building loyalty to online communities through bond and identity-based attachment to sub-groups. In CSCW, pages 146--157, 2014.

Digital Library

[33]

P. A. Thoits. Social support as coping assistance. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 54(4):416--423, Aug. 1986.

[34]

M. Tixier, G. Gaglio, and M. Lewkowicz. Translating social support practices into online services for family caregivers. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, GROUP '09, pages 71--80, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.

Digital Library

[35]

M. Tsikerdekis. The effects of perceived anonymity and anonymity states on conformity and groupthink in online communities: A wikipedia study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5):1001--1015, 2013.

[36]

C.-H. Tu. The relationship between social presence and online privacy. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4):293--318, 2002.

[37]

H. van Oostendorp and F. van Varik. Stimulation of activity in online communities. In A. Dittmar and P. Forbrig, editors, ECCE, pages 163--170. Universitätsdruckerei Rostock, Germany / ACM, 2011.

Digital Library

[38]

B. Wellman and M. Gulia. Net surfers don't ride alone: Virtual communities as communities. In M. A. Smith and P. Kollock, editors, Communities in Cyberspace, pages 167--194. Routledge, 1999.

[39]

F. Wild and C. Stahl. Using latent semantic analysis to assess social competence. In Wild, Kalz, van Bruggen, and Koper, editors, Mini-Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Latent Semantic Analysis in Technology-Enhanced Learning, pages 3--4. Open University Netherlands, March 2007.

[40]

K. Wise, B. Hamman, and K. Thorson. Moderation, response rate, and message interactivity: Features of online communities and their effects on intent to participate. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1):24--41, 2006.

[41]

N. Yamashita, H. Kuzuoka, K. Hirata, and T. Kudo. Understanding the conflicting demands of family caregivers caring for depressed family members. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '13, pages 2637--2646, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.

Digital Library

[42]

H. Zhu, R. Kraut, and A. Kittur. Effectiveness of shared leadership in online communities. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '12, pages 407--416, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.

Digital Library

[43]

H. Zhu, A. Zhang, J. He, R. E. Kraut, and A. Kittur. Effects of peer feedback on contribution: A field experiment in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '13, pages 2253--2262, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.

Digital Library

Cited By

Zhou MMeng BFan W(2023)How do we elicit more user feedback in the social Q&A community? A consideration of the expertise-required questionInformation Technology & People10.1108/ITP-10-2022-075137:4(1587-1612)Online publication date: 22-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2022-0751
Guo CCaine K(2021)Anonymity in Questions and Answers about HealthProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/107118132064115064:1(658-662)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2021
https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181320641150
Guo CCaine K(2021)Anonymity, User Engagement, Quality, and Trolling on Q&A SitesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34492155:CSCW1(1-27)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3449215
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Anonymous Quorans are still Quorans, just anonymous
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interaction paradigms
      1. Web-based interaction

Recommendations

Interpretations of Online Anonymity in Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous

How do individuals in twelve-step fellowships like Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and Narcotics Anonymous (NA) interpret and enact "anonymity?" In this paper, we answer this question through a mixed-methods investigation. Through secondary analysis of ...
Anonymity interacting with participation on a Q&A site

This article presents a study that investigates how anonymity influences user participation in an online question-and-answer platform [Quora (https://www.quora.com/)]. The study is one step in identifying hypotheses that can be used to address a ...
(α, k)-anonymous data publishing

Privacy preservation is an important issue in the release of data for mining purposes. The k-anonymity model has been introduced for protecting individual identification. Recent studies show that a more sophisticated model is necessary to protect the ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

C&T '15: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies

June 2015

167 pages

ISBN:9781450334600

DOI:10.1145/2768545

Conference Chair:
Gabriela Avram
University of Limerick, Ireland
,
Program Chairs:
Fiorella De Cindio
University of Milano, Italy
,
Volkmar Pipek
University of Siegen, Germany

Copyright © 2015 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 June 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

ANR, CNSA

Conference

C&T '15

C&T '15: Communities and Technologies 2015

June 27 - 30, 2015

Limerick, Ireland

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 80 of 183 submissions, 44%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

10
Total Citations
View Citations
293
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)10
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Zhou MMeng BFan W(2023)How do we elicit more user feedback in the social Q&A community? A consideration of the expertise-required questionInformation Technology & People10.1108/ITP-10-2022-075137:4(1587-1612)Online publication date: 22-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2022-0751
Guo CCaine K(2021)Anonymity in Questions and Answers about HealthProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/107118132064115064:1(658-662)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2021
https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181320641150
Guo CCaine K(2021)Anonymity, User Engagement, Quality, and Trolling on Q&A SitesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34492155:CSCW1(1-27)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3449215
Cho JWash R(2021)How Potential New Members Approach an Online CommunityComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)10.1007/s10606-020-09390-0Online publication date: 18-Jan-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-020-09390-0
Haq EBraud THui PAlhajj R(2020)Community matters more than anonymityProceedings of the 12th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining10.1109/ASONAM49781.2020.9381425(94-98)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/ASONAM49781.2020.9381425
Mathew BDutt RMaity SGoyal PMukherjee A(2019)Deep Dive into Anonymity: Large Scale Analysis of Quora QuestionsSocial Informatics10.1007/978-3-030-34971-4_3(35-49)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34971-4_3
Thiel SFröhlich PSackl A(2018)Nutzerorientierte Gestaltung von interaktiver E-PartizipationDigitale Bürgerbeteiligung10.1007/978-3-658-21621-4_6(127-161)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2018
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21621-4_6
Rubya SYarosh S(2017)Interpretations of Online Anonymity in Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics AnonymousProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/31347261:CSCW(1-22)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3134726
Blunk OPrilla MSchuler DLewkowicz MRohde MMulder I(2017)Supporting Communities of Practice in Public AdministrationsProceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies10.1145/3083671.3083699(36-45)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3083671.3083699
Paskuda MLewkowicz M(2017)Anonymity interacting with participation on a Q&A siteAI & Society10.1007/s00146-016-0660-932:3(369-381)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00146-016-0660-9

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten