skip to main content
10.1145/2769458.2769468acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespadsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Knowledge Discovery in Manufacturing Simulations

Published:10 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Discrete event simulation studies in a manufacturing context are a powerful instrument when modeling and evaluating processes of various industries. Usually simulation experts conduct simulation experiments for a predetermined system specification by manually varying parameters through educated assumptions and according to a prior defined goal. Moreover, simulation experts try to reduce complexity and number of simulation runs by excluding parameters that they consider as not influential regarding the simulation project scope. On the other hand, today's world of big data technology enables us to handle huge amounts of data. We therefore investigate the potential benefits of designing large scale experiments with a much broader coverage of possible system behavior. In this paper, we propose an approach for applying data mining methods on simulation data in combination with suitable visualization methods in order to uncover relationships in model behavior to discover knowledge that otherwise would have remained hidden. For a prototypical demonstration we used a clustering algorithm to divide large amounts of simulation output datasets into groups of similar performance values and depict those groups through visualizations to conduct a visual investigation process of the simulation data.

References

  1. Böhm, C., Kailing, K., Kröger, P., and Zimek, A. 2004. Computing Clusters of Correlation Connected Objects. In Proceeding of the 2004 ACM SIGMOD international conference (Paris, France, June 13-18, 2004). SIGMOD/PODS '04. ACM, New York, NY, 455--466. DOI = http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1007568.1007620. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Fayyad, U. M., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., and Smyth, P. 1996. From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery in Databases. AI Magazine 17, 3 (Fall 1996), 37--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Han, J. and Kamber, M. 2006. Data mining. Concepts and techniques. The Morgan Kaufmann series in data management systems. Elsevier; Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam, Boston, San Francisco, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hernandez, A. S., Lucas, T. W., and Carlyle, M. 2012. Constructing nearly orthogonal latin hypercubes for any nonsaturated run-variable combination. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. 22, 4 (Nov. 2012), 1--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Horne, G. E. and Meyer, T. E. 2005. Data Farming: Discovering Surprise. In Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference (Orlando, USA, December 04-07, 2005), 1082--1087. DOI = http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2005.1574362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Keim, D. A., Mansmann, F., Schneidewind, J., Thomas, J., and Ziegler, H. 2008. Visual Analytics: Scope and Challenges. In Visual Data Mining: Theory, Techniques and Tools for Visual Analytics, S. Simoff, M. H. Boehlen and A. Mazeika, Eds. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kleijnen, J. P. C., Sanchez, S. M., Lucas, T. W., and Cioppa, T. M. 2005. State-of-the-Art Review: A User's Guide to the Brave New World of Designing Simulation Experiments. INFORMS Journal on Computing 17, 3 (Summer 2005), 263--289. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Laney, D. 2001. 3D Data Management: Controlling Data Volume, Velocity, and Variety. In Application Delivery Strategies, Number 949, META Group Inc, Stamford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Law, A. M. 2003. How to conduct a successful simulation study. In Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference (New Orleans, USA, December 07-10, 2003), 66--70. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2003.1261409. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. MongoDB Inc. 2010. Why Schemaless? http://blog.mongodb.org/post/119945109/why-schemaless. Accessed 10 February 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sanchez, S. M. 2011. NOLHdesigns spreadsheet. http://harvest.nps.edu/. Accessed 1 February 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sanchez, S. M. 2014. Simulation Experiments: Better Data, not just Big Data. In Proceedings of the 2014 Winter Simulation Conference, (Savannah, USA, December 07-10, 2014), 805--816. DOI = http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2014.7019942. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Thomas, J. J. and Cook, K. A. 2005. Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Wilkinson, L., Anand, A., and Grossman, R. 2006. High-Dimensional Visual Analytics: Interactive Exploration Guided by Pairwise Views of Point Distributions. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graphics 12, 6 (Nov./Dec. 2006), 1363--1372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Frawley, W. J., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., and Matheus, C. J. 1992. Knowledge Discovery in Databases: An Overview. AI Magazine 13, 3 (Fall 1992), 57--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ye, K. Q. 1998. Orthogonal Column Latin Hypercubes and Their Application in Computer Experiments. Journal of the American Statistical Association 93, 444 (Dec 1998), 1430--1439.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Knowledge Discovery in Manufacturing Simulations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGSIM PADS '15: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSIM Conference on Principles of Advanced Discrete Simulation
      June 2015
      300 pages
      ISBN:9781450335836
      DOI:10.1145/2769458

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 June 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGSIM PADS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate35of60submissions,58%Overall Acceptance Rate398of779submissions,51%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader