skip to main content
10.1145/2775441.2775466acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Users to the rescue: the role of user-generated content (UGC) in the Minnesota affordable care act (ACA) website launch

Published:16 July 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper examines the potential of User-Generated Content (UGC) as a site of research for web usability. Specifically, this paper shares a case study of blog responses that detailed user experiences with the 2013 launch of MNsure.org, a high-stakes website created to facilitate the online purchase of health insurance in response to the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA). A content analysis of blog responses, informed by qualitative content analysis [1], revealed poor usability of the site, including a low effectiveness rate, several critical errors, and low satisfaction. User stories were remarkably detailed, offering valuable information for website repairs. Connections between UGC and traditional web usability methods such as usability testing were explored in terms of "community," "participation," and "metrics." Overall, the case demonstrated the potential value of UGC content analysis as a complement to traditional usability testing.

References

  1. Saldaña, J. 2011. Foundations of qualitative research. Series in understanding qualitative research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton, M., and Cummings, R. (Eds.) 2008. Wiki writing: Collaborative learning in the classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ding, H. 2009. Rhetorics of alternative media in an emerging epidemic: SARS, censorship, and extra-institutional risk communication. Technical Communication Quarterly 18, 4, 327--350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Mackiewitz, J. 2010. The co-construction of credibility in online product reviews. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19, 4, 403--426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Ren, Y., Harper, F. M., Drenner, S., Terveen, L., Kiesler, S. 2012. Building member attachment in online communities: applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 36, 3, pp. 841--864. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gedikli, F. 2012. Recommender systems and the social web: Leveraging tagging data for recommender systems. Springer Research. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gentle, A. 2012. Conversation and community: The social web for documentation. Laguna Hills, CA: XML Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Potts, L. 2012. Social media in disaster response: How experience architects can build for participation. New York: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Moens, M-F., Li, J., and Chua, T-S. (Eds.) 2014. Social media and social computer: Mining user generated content. Chapman Hall/CRC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Nielsen, J. 1997. Community is dead: Long live mega-collaboration. Nielsen/Norman Group. Web. 15 August 1997. http://www.nngroup.com/articles/community-is-dead-long-live-mega-collaboration/. Accessed 28 April 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson, R. 1998. User-centered technology: A rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Barnum, C. M. 2011. Usability testing essentials: Ready, set . . . test! New York: Morgan Kaufman. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Krug, S. 2006. Don't make me think: A common sense approach to web usability. 2nd edition. Berkeley, CA: New Riders Publishing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Morville, P. 2012. Understanding Information Architecture. Online presentation. 27 June 2012. Web. http://prezi.com/aafmvya6bk7t/understanding-information-architecture/. Accessed 20 September 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nielsen, J. 1993. Usability engineering. New York, NY: Morgan Kaufman. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Usability.gov. n.d.. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Web. www.usability.gov. Accessed 12 January 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hill, I., Courtot, B., Wilkinson, M. 2013. Reaching and enrolling the uninsured: Early efforts to implement the Affordable Care Act. October 2013. Part of ACA Implementation---Monitoring and Tracking Series Reports. Urban Institute and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. PDF.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yin, R. K. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Olson, M. 2013. Have you tried to use the MNsure website? What was your experience? Minnesota Public Radio. 1 October 2013. Web. http://blogs.mprnews.org/todays-question/2013/10/have-you-tried-to-use-the-mnsure-website-what-was-your-experience-like/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Olson, J. 2013. Sign-up navigators are helping to ease MNsure headaches. Star Tribune. 23 December 2013. Web. http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/health/237103701.html/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Wurtzel, Nancy. 2014. MNsure made me cry: My five-month quest for health insurance. Star Tribune. 24 March 2014. Web. http://www.startribune.com/local/yourvoices/251086801.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Richert, C., and Stawicki, E. 2014. Management, technology failures, miscommunication plagued MNsure. Minneapolis Star Tribune. 12 February 2014. Web. http://www.mprnews.org/story/2014/02/12/health/mnsure-tech-failures-management-issues/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Users to the rescue: the role of user-generated content (UGC) in the Minnesota affordable care act (ACA) website launch

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGDOC '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference on the Design of Communication
        July 2015
        239 pages
        ISBN:9781450336482
        DOI:10.1145/2775441

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 July 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGDOC '15 Paper Acceptance Rate49of82submissions,60%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader