skip to main content
10.1145/2775441.2775479acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Capturing social value in UX projects

Published:16 July 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this experience report, authors detail how qualitative User Experience (UX) research aligned the interests of UX researchers with the interests of the communities being investigated to increase participant engagement. Because UX research is designed to maximize insights into user motivation, part of UX ethical concerns should include how insights get integrated into the communities where the technology is deployed. This report discusses successes and challenges of drawing conclusions from qualitative research in an annual art event. In the Fargo-Moorhead Art Marathon, content creators collected user data, collaboratively strategized with participants, and refined a three-year-old event that has grown from a loose assortment of performances into a ten-day multi-mediated art event created for alternative art engagement. The authors, who conducted initial research to create a phone app to track the participant progress, report on how event data during was evaluated and folded into the next iteration.

References

  1. Mara, A., Potts, L. and Bartocci, G. 2013. The Ethics of Agile Ethnography. SIGDOC Proceedings of the 31st ACM international conference on design of communication. 101--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Cresswell, J. W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Third edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Potts, L. and Bartocci, G. 2009. <Methods>Experience Design</Methods> SIGDOC Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on Design of communication. 17--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bargas-Avila, J., and Hornbæk, K. 2012. Foci and Blind Spots in User Experience Research. Interactions. 19(6), 24--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Potts, L. 2014. Social Media in Disaster Response: How Experience Architects can Build for Participation. New York, NY: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fetterman, D. M. 2010. Ethnography: Step by Step. Third edition. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mara, M. and Mara, A. 2012. Irish Identification as Exigence: A Self-Service Case Study for Producing User Documentation in Online Contexts. Computer-Mediated Communication across Cultures. IGI Global, 173--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Clair, R. P. 2003. The Changing Story of Ethnography. In Expressions of Ethnography: Novel Approaches to Qualitative Methods, ed. Robin Patrick Claire. New York: SUNY Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Read, S. 2011. The Mundane, Power, and Symmetry: A Reading of the Field with Dorothy Winsor and the Tradition of Ethnographic Research. Technical Communication Quarterly. 20.4. 353--383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Millen, D. 2000. Rapid Ethnography: Time-Deepening Strategies for HCI Field Research. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques. 280--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Williams, A. 2009. User-Centered Design, Activity-Centered Design, and Goal-Directed Design: A Review of Three Methods for Designing Web Applications. Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on Design of communication. 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jenkins, H. (2006) Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. New York, NY: NYU Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuniavsky, M. 2003. Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner's Guide to Use Research. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Beyer, H., and Holtzblatt, K. 1998. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Portigal. S. 2013. Interviewing Users: How to Uncover Compelling Insights. New York, NY, Rosenfeld.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Crumlish, C. and Malone, E. 2009. Designing Social Interfaces. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Capturing social value in UX projects

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGDOC '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference on the Design of Communication
      July 2015
      239 pages
      ISBN:9781450336482
      DOI:10.1145/2775441

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 July 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGDOC '15 Paper Acceptance Rate49of82submissions,60%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader