skip to main content
10.1145/2783258.2783305acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Why It Happened: Identifying and Modeling the Reasons of the Happening of Social Events

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In nowadays social networks, a huge volume of content containing rich information, such as reviews, ratings, microblogs, etc., is being generated, consumed and diffused by users all the time. Given the temporal information, we can obtain the event cascade which indicates the time sequence of the arrival of information to users. Many models have been proposed to explain how information diffuses. However, most existing models cannot give a clear explanation why every specific event happens in the event cascade. Such explanation is essential for us to have a deeper understanding of information diffusion as well as a better prediction of future event cascade.

In order to uncover the mechanism of the happening of social events, we analyze the rating event data crawled from Douban.com, a Chinese social network, from year 2006 to 2011. We distinguish three factors: social, external and intrinsic influence which can explain the emergence of every specific event. Then we use the mixed Poisson process to model event cascade generated by different factors respectively and integrate different Poisson processes with shared parameters. The proposed model, called Combinational Mixed Poisson Process (CMPP) model, can explain not only how information diffuses in social networks, but also why a specific event happens. This model can help us to understand information diffusion from both macroscopic and microscopic perspectives. We develop an efficient Classification EM algorithm to infer the model parameters. The explanatory and predictive power of the proposed model has been demonstrated by the experiments on large real data sets.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p1015.mp4

mp4

140.6 MB

References

  1. A. Anagnostopoulos, R. Kumar, and M. Mahdian. Influence and correlation in social networks. In KDD, pages 7--15, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Bourigault, C. Lagnier, S. Lamprier, L. Denoyer, and P. Gallinari. Learning social network embeddings for predicting information diffusion. In WSDM, pages 393--402, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Celeux and G. Govaert. A classification em algorithm for clustering and two stochastic versions. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 14(3):315--332, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. Crane and D. Sornette. Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system. PNAS, 105(41):15649--15653, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. D. J. Daley and D. Vere-Jones. An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Volume I. Springer, New York, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. Goldenberg, B. Libai, and E. Muller. Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the underlying process of word-of-mouth. Marketing Letters, 12(3):211--223, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. Gomez-Rodriguez, D. Balduzzi, and B. Schölkopf. Uncovering the temporal dynamics of diffusion networks. In ICML, pages 561--568, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Gomez-Rodriguez, J. Leskovec, and A. Krause. Inferring networks of diffusion and influence. In KDD, pages 1019--1028, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Gomez-Rodriguez, J. Leskovec, and B. Schölkopf. Modeling information propagation with survival theory. In ICML, pages 666--674, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Gomez-Rodriguez, J. Leskovec, and B. Schölkopf. Structure and dynamics of information pathways in online media. In WSDM, pages 23--32, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Guille and H. Hacid. A predictive model for the temporal dynamics of information diffusion in online social networks. In WWW, pages 1145--1152, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. T.-A. Hoang and E.-P. Lim. Retweeting: An act of viral users, susceptible users, or viral topics? In SDM, pages 569--577, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. T. Iwata, A. Shah, and Z. Ghahramani. Discovering latent influence in online social activities via shared cascade poisson processes. In KDD, pages 266--274, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. J. Karau and K. D. Williams. Social loafing: Research findings, implications, and future directions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(5):134--140, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and É. Tardos. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In KDD, pages 137--146, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. C. Lagnier, L. Denoyer, E. Gaussier, and P. Gallinari. Predicting information diffusion in social networks using content and user's profiles. In ECIR, pages 74--85, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Y. Li, W. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z.-L. Zhang. Influence diffusion dynamics and influence maximization in social networks with friend and foe relationships. In WSDM, pages 657--666, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. H. Ma, H. Yang, M. R. Lyu, and I. King. Mining social networks using heat diffusion processes for marketing candidates selection. In CIKM, pages 233--242, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. S. A. Myers, C. Zhu, and J. Leskovec. Information diffusion and external influence in networks. In KDD, pages 33--41, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. K. Saito, M. Kimura, K. Ohara, and H. Motoda. Generative models of information diffusion with asynchronous time-delay. In ACML, pages 193--208, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. K. Saito, R. Nakano, and M. Kimura. Prediction of information diffusion probabilities for independent cascade model. In KES, pages 67--75. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. K. Saito, K. Ohara, Y. Yamagishi, M. Kimura, and H. Motoda. Learning diffusion probability based on node attributes in social networks. In FIS, pages 153--162, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. Silva, S. Guimarães, W. Meira Jr, and M. Zaki. Profilerank: finding relevant content and influential users based on information diffusion. In SNA-KDD, page 2, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. A. Simma and M. I. Jordan. Modeling events with cascades of poisson processes. In UAI, pages 546--555, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. E. Zhong, W. Fan, J. Wang, L. Xiao, and Y. Li. Comsoc: Adaptive transfer of user behaviors over composite social network. In KDD, pages 696--704, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Why It Happened: Identifying and Modeling the Reasons of the Happening of Social Events

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '15: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
      August 2015
      2378 pages
      ISBN:9781450336642
      DOI:10.1145/2783258

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 August 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      KDD '15 Paper Acceptance Rate160of819submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader