skip to main content
10.1145/2785830.2785847acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

SeeSaw: I See You Saw My Video Message

Published:24 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

We developed a prototype called SeeSaw that explored using reaction video and auto reply to create an engaging video messaging experience. When viewing a video message, reaction video captures a video of the viewer's reaction to share back with the message sender. After finishing viewing the video message, auto reply immediately begins recording the viewer's response. A pilot study found that SeeSaw evoked conversational and authentic interactions, even though the messages were captured remotely and asynchronously. A follow-up comparative lab study found that reaction video encouraged a more conversational exchange, while both features together enhanced the authenticity of the experience. Although participants preferred the reaction video only condition, they perceived that the reaction video plus auto reply condition combined the conversationality of a video call with the flexibility of asynchronous messaging.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Yanqing Cui, Jari Kangas, Jukka Holm, and Guido Grassel, Front-camera video recordings as emotion responses to mobile photos shared within close-knit groups, CHI 2013, 981--990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Honglu Du, Kori Inkpen Quinn, Konstantinos Chorianopoulos, Mary Czerwinski, Paul Johns, Aaron Hoff, Asta Roseway, Sarah Morlidge, John C. Tang, and Tom Gross, VideoPal: Exploring Asynchronous Video-Messaging to Enable Cross- Cultural Friendships, ECSCW 2011, 273--292Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Maeve Duggan, Photo and Video Sharing Grow Online, October 28, 2013, http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/10/28/photo-and-video-sharing-grow-online/, (verified May 16, 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Erving Goffman, The Presentation of Self In Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday, 1959.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Charles Goodwin, Turn Construction and Conversational Organization, Rethinking Communication: Paradigm Exemplars, Brenda Dervin, Barbara J. O'Keefe, Ellen Wartella (Eds.), Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1989, 88--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Richard Harper, Leysia Palen, and Alex Taylor (Eds.), The inside text: Social, cultural and design perspectives on SMS, Dordrecht: Springer, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kori Inkpen, Honglu Du, Asta Roseway, Aaron Hoff, and Paul Johns, Video kids: augmenting close friendships with asynchronous video conversations in VideoPal. CHI 2012, 2387--2396. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Tejinder K. Judge, Carman Neustaedter, and Andrew F. Kurtz, The family window: The design and evaluation of a domestic media space, CHI 2010, 2361--2370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Oskar Juhlin, Goranka Zoric, Arvid Engström, and Erika Reponen, Video interaction: A research agenda, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (18) 2014, 685--692. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Mamoun Nawahdah and Tomoo Inoue, Virtually dining together in time-shifted environment: KIZUNA design, CSCW 2013, 779--788. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kenton O'Hara, Alison Black, and Matthew Lipson, Everyday practices with mobile video telephony, CHI 2006, 871--880. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kenton O'Hara, Michael Massimi, Richard H. R. Harper, Simon Rubens, and Jessica Morris: Everyday dwelling with WhatsApp, CSCW 2014, 1131--1143. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hayes Raffle, Rafael Ballagas, Glenda Revelle, Koichi Mori, Hiroshi Horii, Christopher Paretti, and Mirjana Spasojevic, Pop goes the cell phone: Asynchronous messaging for preschoolers, IDC 2011, 99--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ruud Schatorje and Panos Markopoulos, Intra-Family Messaging with Family Circles, Connecting Families: The Impact of New Communication Technologies on Domestic Life, Springer, 2012, 57--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. John C. Tang, Jennifer Marlow, Aaron Hoff, Asta Roseway, Kori Inkpen, Chen Zhao, and Xiang Cao, Time Travel Proxy: Using lightweight video recordings to create asynchronous, interactive meetings, CHI 2012, 3111--3120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. SeeSaw: I See You Saw My Video Message

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobileHCI '15: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
      August 2015
      611 pages
      ISBN:9781450336529
      DOI:10.1145/2785830

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 August 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader