skip to main content
10.1145/2786451.2786483acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Considering a Wider Web?: Employing Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis in Exploration of Multiple Online Spaces

Published: 28 June 2015 Publication History

Abstract

What sets the Web apart from 'traditional' mass media is almost instantaneous access to diverse spaces that users navigate in customized ways. Users are often bound up as producers and consumers of materials online [1]. As a result, new avenues for research have emerged for both large ('Big Data') and small-scale Web studies. Research across this spectrum, however, has tended to focus on singular types of Web platform (i.e. Twitter data, online forums etc.). Web users, conversely, are unlikely to relegate browsing to discrete types of Web space. What will be argued here -- with reference to an ongoing case study researching the role of the Web on production and consumption of aesthetic surgery - is usefulness and significance of multimodal critical discourse analysis (MMCDA) for qualitative research across multiple online spaces. MMCDA examines intersecting visual media and texts to recognize and comprehend (re)production of dominant meanings in various contexts. Employing MMCDA across a selection of different types of websites -- assembling a 'snapshot' of a topic(s) - enables wider qualitative exploration of complementary, competing, and contradictory visual and textual sources confronting users on an everyday, experiential level. This raises important epistemological and ethical issues pertinent to undertaking qualitative research on the Web. How do different Web spaces contribute to construction of dominant discourses? How do we - as researchers - gather, analyze and use various data ethically? From this emerges potential for developing more intricate understandings of diverse content available at the click of a hyperlink.

References

[1]
Jurgenson, N. and Ritzer, G. 2010. Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the Age of the Digital 'Prosumer'. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10 (1). 13--36.
[2]
O'Reilly, T. 2007. What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Communications and Strategies, 65 (1). 17--37.
[3]
Augustson, E. M., Chou, W. Y. S., Finney Rutten, L. J. Hesse, B. W., O'Connell, M. and Shaikh, A. R. 2011. Realizing the Promise of Web 2.0: Engaging Community Intelligence. Journal of Health Communication, 16 (sup1). 10--31.
[4]
Flanagin, A. J. and Metzger, M. J. 2011. Using Web 2.0 technologies to Enhance Evidence-Based Medical Information. Journal of Health Communication, 16 (1). 45--58.
[5]
Sheehan, K.B. 2007. Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Branded Drug Websites: Risk Presentation and Implications for Public Policy. Journal of Advertising, 36 (3). 123--135.
[6]
Boyd, D. and Crawford, K. 2012. Critical Questions for Big Data: Provocations for a Cultural, Technological, and Scholarly Phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15 (5). 662--679.
[7]
Eaton, C. and Zikopoulos, P. Understanding Big Data: Analytics for Enterprise Class Hadoop and Streaming Data, Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill. 2003.
[8]
Liu, X., Liu, J. K., Lu, R., Shao, J. and Zhu, H. 2014. Toward Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Computing in Big Data Era. Network, IEEE, 28 (4). 46--50.
[9]
Alvesson, M. & Karreman, D. 2000. Varieties of Discourse: On the Study of Organizations through Discourse Analysis. Human relations, 53 (9). 1125--1149.
[10]
Rose, G. Visual Methodologies, London: Sage. 2005.
[11]
Wodak, R. Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. in Verschueren, J.; Ostman, J.O. & Blommaert, J. eds. Handbook of Pragmatics, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1995, 204--210.
[12]
van Dijk, D.A. Critical Discourse Analysis. in Schiffren, D., Tannen, D. & Hamilton, H.E. (Eds.) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, London: Blackwell, 2001, 352--371
[13]
Mautner, G. 2005. Time to get Wired: Using Web-Based Corpora in Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse and Society, 16 (6). 809--828.
[14]
Adams, S. A. 2014. Maintaining the Collision of Accounts: Crowdsourcing Sites in Health Care as Brokers in the Co-Production of Pharmaceutical Knowledge. Information, Communication & Society, 17 (6). 657--669.
[15]
Lee, C. and Moran, C. 2013. Selling Genital Cosmetic Surgery to Healthy Women: a Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Australian Surgical Websites. Critical Discourse Studies, 10 (4). 373--391.
[16]
Bell, D., Hardy, K., Holliday, R., Hunter, E., Jones, M., Probyn, E. and Taylor, J. S. 2013. Beautiful Face, Beautiful Place: Relational Geographies and Gender in Cosmetic Surgery Tourism Websites. Gender, Place & Culture. 1--17.
[17]
Bourdieu, P. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, London: Routledge. 1984.
[18]
Grefenstette, G. and Kilgarriff, A. 2003. Introduction to the Special Issue on the Web as Corpus. Computational Linguistics, 29 (3). 333--347.
[19]
Davis, K. Reshaping the Female Body: The Dilemma of Cosmetic Surgery, New York: Routledge. 1995.
[20]
Posavac, H. D., Posavac, S. S. and Posavac, E. J. 1998. Exposure to Media Images of Female Attractiveness and Concern with Body Weight Among Young Women. Sex Roles, 38 (3-4). 187--201.
[21]
Groesz, L. M., Levine, M. P. and Murnen, S. K. 2002. The Effect of Experimental Presentation of Thin Media Images on Body Satisfaction: A Meta-Analytic Review. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31 (1). 1--16.
[22]
Beresin, E. V. and Derenne, J. L. 2006. Body Image, Media, and Eating Disorders. Academic Psychiatry, 30 (3). 257--261.
[23]
Hansen, M. B. and Wegenstein, B. Getting Under the Skin: Body and Media Theory. Boston: MIT Press. 2006.
[24]
Crockett, R. J., Persing, J. A. and Pruzinsky, T. 2007. The Influence of Plastic Surgery "Reality TV" on Cosmetic Surgery Patient Expectations and Decision Making. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 120 (1). 316--324.
[25]
Grabe, S., Hyde, J. S. and Ward, L. M. 2008. The Role of the Media in Body Image Concerns among Women: a Meta-Analysis of Experimental and Correlational Studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134 (3). 460--476.
[26]
Swami, V. 2009. Body Appreciation, Media Influence, and Weight Status Predict Consideration of Cosmetic Surgery among Female Undergraduates. Body Image, 6 (4). 315--317.
[27]
Lunde, C. 2013. Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery, Body Appreciation, Body Ideal Internalization, and Fashion Blog Reading among Late Adolescents in Sweden. Body Image, 10 (4). 632--635.
[28]
Langville, A. N. and Meyer, C. D. Google's PageRank and Beyond: The Science of Search Engine Rankings. Princeton University Press. 2011.

Index Terms

  1. Considering a Wider Web?: Employing Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis in Exploration of Multiple Online Spaces

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WebSci '15: Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference
      June 2015
      366 pages
      ISBN:9781450336727
      DOI:10.1145/2786451
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 28 June 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Aesthetic Surgery
      2. Big Data
      3. Discourse
      4. Multimodality
      5. Qualitative Research
      6. Web

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      WebSci '15
      Sponsor:
      WebSci '15: ACM Web Science Conference
      June 28 - July 1, 2015
      Oxford, United Kingdom

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 245 of 933 submissions, 26%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 99
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 23 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media