skip to main content
10.1145/2786567.2793710acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Effects of Display Sizes on a Scrolling Task using a Cylindrical Smartwatch

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

With a growing interest in wrist-worn devices, research has typically focused on expanding the available interaction area for smartwatches. In this paper, we instead investigate how different display sizes influence task performance, while maintaining a consistent input area. We conducted an experiment in which users completed a scrolling task using a small display, a large display, and a cylindrical display wrapped around the wrist. We found that the large and cylindrical displays resulted in faster task performances than the small display. We also found that the cylindrical display removed constraints on the participants' body pose, suggesting that cylindrical displays have unique benefits for mobile interactions.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Brearley, H.C. Time Telling through the Ages. Doubleday, Page & Co, New York, 1919.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jesse Burstyn, Paul Strohmeier, and Roel Vertegaal. 2015. DisplaySkin: Exploring Pose-Aware Displays on a Flexible Electrophoretic Wristband. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '15). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2677199.2680596 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chris Harrison and Scott E. Hudson. 2009. Abracadabra: wireless, high-precision, and unpowered finger input for very small mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '09). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1622176.1622199 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chris Harrison, Shilpa Ramamurthy, and Scott E. Hudson. 2012. On-body interaction: armed and dangerous. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '12), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2148131.2148148 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. David Holman, Jesse Burstyn, Ryan Brotman, Audrey Younkin, and Roel Vertegaal. 2013. Flexkit: a rapid prototyping platform for flexible displays. In Proceedings of the adjunct publication of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '13 Adjunct). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2508468.2514934 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kent Lyons, David Nguyen, Daniel Ashbrook, and Sean White. 2012. Facet: a multi-segment wrist worn system. In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '12). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2380116.2380134 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ian Oakley and Doyoung Lee. 2014. Interaction on the edge: offset sensing for small devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2557138 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Simon Olberding, Kian Peen Yeo, Suranga Nanayakkara, and Jurgen Steimle. 2013. AugmentedForearm: exploring the design space of a display-enhanced forearm. In Proceedings of the 4th Augmented Human International Conference (AH '13). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2459236.2459239 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Simon T. Perrault, Eric Lecolinet, James Eagan, and Yves Guiard. 2013. Watchit: simple gestures and eyes-free interaction for wristwatches and bracelets. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2470654.2466192 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Paul Strohmeier. 2015. DIY IR sensors for augmenting objects and human skin. In Proceedings of the 6th Augmented Human International Conference (AH '15). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2735711.2735802 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Aneesh P. Tarun, Byron Lahey, Audrey Girouard, Winslow Burleson, and Roel Vertegaal. 2011. Snaplet: using body shape to inform function in mobile flexible display devices. In CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '11). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1979742.1979701 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Robert Xiao, Gierad Laput, and Chris Harrison. 2014. Expanding the input expressivity of smartwatches with mechanical pan, twist, tilt and click. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2557017 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Cheng Xu and Kent Lyons. 2015. Shimmering Smartwatches: Exploring the Smartwatch Design Space. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '15). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2677199.2680599 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Effects of Display Sizes on a Scrolling Task using a Cylindrical Smartwatch

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobileHCI '15: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct
      August 2015
      697 pages
      ISBN:9781450336536
      DOI:10.1145/2786567

      Copyright © 2015 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 August 2015

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader