skip to main content
10.1145/2788539.2788544acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessccgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Surface reflectance characterization by statistical tools

Published:22 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The classification of surface reflectance functions as diffuse, specular, and glossy has been introduced by Heckbert more than two decades ago. Many rendering algorithms are dependent on such a classification, as different kinds of light transport will be handled by specialized methods, for example, caustics require specular bounce or refraction. As the surface reflectance models are more and more rich and descriptive including those based on measured data, it has not been possible to keep such a characterization simple. Each surface reflectance model is mostly handled separately, or alternatively, the rendering algorithm restricts itself to the use of some subset of reflectance models. We provide a general characterization for arbitrary surface reflectance representation by means of statistical tools. We demonstrate by rendered images using Matusik's BRDF data sets for two environment maps and two 3D objects (sphere and Utah teapot) that there is even a visible perceptual correspondence to the proposed surface reflectance characterization, when we use monochromatic surface reflectance and the albedo is normalized for rendering images to equalize perceived brightness. The proposed characterization is intended to be used to optimize rendering algorithms.

References

  1. Balling, B. L., and Marciniak, M. A. 2009. Comparison of Several Surfaces for Use as a MWIR BRDF Standard. In Proceedings of SPIE 7453, Infrared Spaceborne Remote Sensing and Instrumentation XVII, SPIE, 74530O--74530O--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Colbert, M., Premoze, S., and Francois, G. 2010. Importance Sampling for Production Rendering. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2010 Course Notes, ACM SIGGRAH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dachsbacher, C., Křivánek, J., Hašan, M., Arbree, A., Walter, B., and Novák, J. 2013. Scalable Realistic Rendering with Many-Light Methods. Computer Graphics Forum 32, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dammertz, H., Keller, A., and Lensch, H. 2010. Progressive Point-Light-Based Global Illumination. Computer Graphics Forum 29, 8, 2504--2515.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dror, R., Adelson, E., and Willsky, A. 2001. Recognition of Surface Reflectance Properties from a Single Image under Unknown Real-World Illumination. In MIT AIM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghosh, A., Chen, T., Peers, P., Wilson, C. A., and Debevec, P. 2009. Estimating Specular Roughness and Anisotropy from Second Order Spherical Gradient Illumination. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Eurographics conference on Rendering, Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, EGSR'09, 1161--1170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Havran, V., and Sbert, M. 2014. Optimal Combination of Techniques in Multiple Importance Sampling. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry, ACM, New York, NY, USA, VRCAI '14, 141--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Heckbert, P. S. 1990. Adaptive Radiosity Textures for Bidirectional Ray Tracing. In Proceedings of the 17th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM, New York, NY, USA, SIGGRAPH '90, 145--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hoover, B., and Gamiz, V. 2006. Coherence Solution for Bidirectional Reflectance Distributions of Surfaces with Wavelength-Scale Statistics. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 23, 2, 314--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jensen, H. W. 2001. Realistic Image Synthesis Using Photon Mapping. A. K. Peters, Ltd., Natick, MA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kajiya, J. T. 1986. The Rendering Equation. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '86 Proceedings), D. C. Evans and R. J. Athay, Eds., vol. 20, 143--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lafortune, E. P., and Willems, Y. D. 1994. Using the Modified Phong Reflectance Model for Physically Based Rendering. Tech. Rep. report CW197, Dept. of Computer Science, K.U.Leuven.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lafortune, E. P. F., Foo, S.-C., Torrance, K. E., and Greenberg, D. P. 1997. Non-Linear Approximation of Reflectance Functions. In Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA, SIGGRAPH '97, 117--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Leloup, F. 2012. New Methods and Models Improving the Prediction of Visual Gloss Perception. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering Science, KU Leuven.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Matusik, W., Pfister, H., Brand, M., and McMillan, L. 2003. A Data-driven Reflectance Model. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3 (July), 759--769. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ngan, A., Durand, F., and Matusik, W. 2005. Experimental Analysis of BRDF Models. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, Eurographics Association, 117--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Nicodemus, F. E., Richmond, J. C., Hsia, J. J., Ginsberg, I. W., and Limperis, T. 1977. Geometric Considerations and Nomenclature for Reflectance. Monograph 161, National Bureau of Standards (US), October.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Pajot, A., Barthe, L., Paulin, M., and Poulin, P. 2011. Representativity for Robust and Adaptive Multiple Importance Sampling. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 8 (Aug.), 1108--1121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Pellacini, F., Ferwerda, J. A., and Greenberg, D. P. 2000. Toward a Psychophysically-Based Light Reflection Model for Image Synthesis. In Proceedings of the 27th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA, SIGGRAPH '00, 55--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rubinstein, R., and Kroese, D. 2008. Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Vangorp, P. 2009. Human Visual Perception of Materials in Realistic Computer Graphics. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering Science, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Veach, E., and Guibas, L. J. 1995. Optimally Combining Sampling Techniques for Monte Carlo Rendering. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM, New York, NY, USA, SIGGRAPH '95, 419--428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Veach, E. 1997. Robust Monte Carlo Methods for Light Transport Simulation. PhD thesis, Stanford University. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Weidlich, A., and Wilkie, A. 2007. Arbitrarily layered microfacet surfaces. In GRAPHITE 2007, ACM, 171--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Wu, H., Dorsey, J., and Rushmeier, H. 2011. A Sparse Parametric Mixture Model for BTF Compression, Editing and Rendering. Computer Graphics Forum 30, 465--473.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Surface reflectance characterization by statistical tools

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        SCCG '15: Proceedings of the 31st Spring Conference on Computer Graphics
        April 2015
        152 pages
        ISBN:9781450336932
        DOI:10.1145/2788539

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 April 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate42of81submissions,52%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader