skip to main content
research-article

Perception of Emotion and Personality through Full-Body Movement Qualities: A Sport Coach Case Study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 October 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Virtual sport coaches guide users through their physical activity and provide motivational support. Users’ motivation can rapidly decay if the movements of the virtual coach are too stereotyped. Kinematic patterns generated while performing a predefined fitness movement can elicit and help to prolong users’ interaction and interest in training. Human body kinematics has been shown to convey various social attributes such as gender, identity, and acted emotions. To date, no study provides information regarding how spontaneous emotions and personality traits together are perceived from full-body movements. In this article, we study how people make reliable inferences regarding spontaneous emotional dimensions and personality traits of human coaches from kinematic patterns they produced when performing a fitness sequence. Movements were presented to participants via a virtual mannequin to isolate the influence of kinematics on perception. Kinematic patterns of biological movement were analyzed in terms of movement qualities according to the effort-shape [Dell 1977] notation proposed by Laban [1950]. Three studies were performed to provide an analysis of the process leading to perception: from coaches’ states and traits through bodily movements to observers’ social perception. Thirty-two participants (i.e., observers) were asked to rate the movements of the virtual mannequin in terms of conveyed emotion dimensions, personality traits (five-factor model of personality), and perceived movement qualities (effort-shape) from 56 fitness movement sequences. The results showed high reliability for most of the evaluated dimensions, confirming interobserver agreement from kinematics at zero acquaintance. A large expressive halo merging emotional (e.g., perceived intensity) and personality aspects (e.g., extraversion) was found, driven by perceived kinematic impulsivity and energy. Observers’ perceptions were partially accurate for emotion dimensions and were not accurate for personality traits. Together, these results contribute to both the understanding of dimensions of social perception through movement and the design of expressive virtual sport coaches.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Nancy Alvarado. 1997. Arousal and valence in the direct scaling of emotional response to film clips. Motiv. Emot. 21, 4 (December 1997), 323--348. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024484306654Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Nalini Ambady, Frank J. Bernieri, and Jennifer A. Richeson. 2000. Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Mark P. Zanna, ed. Academic Press, 201--271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Betsy App, Daniel N. McIntosh, Catherine L. Reed, and Matthew J. Hertenstein. 2011. Nonverbal channel use in communication of emotion: How may depend on why. Emotion 11, 3 (2011), 603--617. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023164Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Anthony P. Atkinson, Winand H. Dittrich, Andrew J. Gemmell, and Andrew W. Young. 2004. Emotion perception from dynamic and static body expressions in point-light and full-light displays. Perception 33, 6 (2004), 717--746. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p5096Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Avi Barliya, Lars Omlor, Martin A. Giese, Alain Berthoz, and Tamar Flash. 2013. Expression of emotion in the kinematics of locomotion. Exp. Brain Res. 225, 2 (March 2013), 159--176. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3357-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Frank J. Bernieri, John S. Gillis, Janet M. Davis, and Jon E. Grahe. 1996. Dyad rapport and the accuracy of its judgment across situations: A lens model analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71, 1 (1996), 110--129. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.110Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Diane S. Berry and Jane Sherman Hansen. 2000. Personality, nonverbal behavior, and interaction quality in female dyads. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 26, 3 (March 2000), 278--292. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ray L. Birdwhistell. 1972. Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. Am. J. Psychol. 85, 3 (September 1972), 441. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1420845Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Timothy A. Brown. 2006. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. Guilford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Egon Brunswik. 1956. Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments. University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Peter E. Bull. 1987. Posture and gesture, Elmsford, NY, US: Pergamon Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull. 56, 2 (1959), 81--105. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0046016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Antonio Camurri, Ingrid Lagerlöf, and Gualtiero Volpe. 2003. Recognizing emotion from dance movement: Comparison of spectator recognition and automated techniques. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 59, 1--2 (July 2003), 213--225. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00050-8 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. William H. Cooper. 1981. Ubiquitous halo. Psychol. Bull. 90, 2 (September 1981), 218--244. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.218Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Paul T. Costa and Robert R. McCrae. 1992. Four ways five factors are basic. Personal. Individ. Differ. 13, 6 (June 1992), 653--665. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-IGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Elizabeth A. Crane and M. Melissa Gross. 2013. Effort-shape characteristics of emotion-related body movement. J. Nonverbal Behav. 37, 2 (June 2013), 91--105. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10919-013-0144-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Geoff Cumming and Sue Finch. 2005. Inference by eye: Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. Am. Psychol. 60, 2 (2005), 170--180. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.170Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Marie Dacey, Amy Baltzell, and Len Zaichkowsky. 2008. Older adults’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation toward physical activity. Am. J. Health Behav. 32, 6 (November 2008), 570--582. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.32.6.2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Nele Dael, Martijn Goudbeek, and K. R. Scherer. 2013. Perceived gesture dynamics in nonverbal expression of emotion. Perception 42, 6 (2013), 642--657. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p7364Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Nele Dael, Marcello Mortillaro, and Klaus R. Scherer. 2012. The body action and posture coding system (BAP): Development and reliability. J. Nonverbal Behav. 36, 2 (June 2012), 97--121. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10919-012-0130-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Richard J. Davidson, Klaus Rainer Scherer, and H. Hill Goldsmith. 2003. Handbook of Affective Sciences. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Cecily Dell. 1977. A Primer for Movement Description Using Effort-Shape and Supplementary Concepts. Dance Notation Bureau, Center for Movement Research and Analysis, Bureau Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Edith Van Dyck, Pieter-Jan Maes, Jonathan Hargreaves, Micheline Lesaffre, and Marc Leman. 2013. Expressing induced emotions through free dance movement. J. Nonverbal Behav. 37, 3 (September 2013), 175--190. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10919-013-0153-1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Andrew D. Engell, James V. Haxby, and Alexander Todorov. 2007. Implicit trustworthiness decisions: Automatic coding of face properties in the human amygdala. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 9 (September 2007), 1508--1519. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1508 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Betty H. La France, Alan D. Heisel, and Michael J. Beatty. 2004. Is there empirical evidence for a nonverbal profile of extraversion? A meta analysis and critique of the literature. Commun. Monogr. 71, 1 (2004), 28--48. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634520410001693148Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Barbara L. Fredrickson. 1998. What good are positive emotions? Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2, 3 (1998), 300--319. DOI:http://dx. doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Nico H. Frijda. 1986. The Emotions. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Peggy E. Gallaher. 1992. Individual differences in nonverbal behavior: Dimensions of style. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 63, 1 (1992), 133--145. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.133Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Steven W. Gangestad, Jeffry A. Simpson, Kenneth DiGeronimo, and Michael Biek. 1992. Differential accuracy in person perception across traits: Examination of a functional hypothesis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 62, 4 (1992), 688--698. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.688Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Robert Gifford. 1991. Mapping nonverbal behavior on the interpersonal circle. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 61, 2 (1991), 279--288. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.279Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Howard Giles and Beth A. Le Poire. 2006. Introduction: The ubiquity and social meaningfulness of nonverbal communication. In The SAGE Handbook of Nonverbal Communication. SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Donald Glowinski, Nele Dael, Antonio Camurri, Gualtiero Volpe, Marcello Mortillaro, and Klaus Scherer. 2011. Toward a minimal representation of affective gestures. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 2, 2 (April 2011), 106--118. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.7 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Michael H. Graham. 2003. Confronting multicolinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84, 11 (November 2003), 2809--2815. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/02-3114Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Karl Grammer, Valentina Filova, and Martin Fieder. 1997. The communication paradox and possible solutions. In New Aspects of Human Ethology. Alain Schmitt, Klaus Atzwanger, Karl Grammer, & Katrin Schääfer, eds. Springer US, 91--120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. William G. Graziano, Meara M. Habashi, Brad E. Sheese, and Renée M. Tobin. 2007. Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person × situation perspective. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 93, 4 (2007), 583--599. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.583Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. James J. Gross and Oliver P. John. 1995. Facets of emotional expressivity: Three self-report factors and their correlates. Personal. Individ. Differ. 19, 4 (October 1995), 555--568. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00055-BGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. M. Melissa Gross, Elizabeth A. Crane, and Barbara L. Fredrickson. 2012. Effort-Shape and kinematic assessment of bodily expression of emotion during gait. Hum. Mov. Sci. 31, 1 (February 2012), 202--221. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2011.05.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. M. Melissa Gross, Elizabeth A. Crane, and Barbara L. Fredrickson. 2010. Methodology for assessing bodily expression of emotion. J. Nonverbal Behav. 34, 4 (December 2010), 223--248. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10919-010-0094-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Judith A. Hall, Susan A. Andrzejewski, Nora A. Murphy, Marianne Schmid Mast, and Brian A. Feinstein. 2008. Accuracy of judging others’ traits and states: Comparing mean levels across tests. J. Res. Personal. 42, 6 (December 2008), 1476--1489. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.06.013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Jari K. Hietanen, Jukka M. Leppänen, and Ulla Lehtonen. 2004. Perception of emotions in the hand movement quality of Finnish sign language. J. Nonverbal Behav. 28, 1 (March 2004), 53--64. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JONB.0000017867.70191.68Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. David C. Hoaglin, Boris Iglewicz, and John W. Tukey. 1986. Performance of some resistant rules for outlier labeling. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81, 396 (December 1986), 991--999. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478363Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Ben Jackson, James A. Dimmock, Daniel F. Gucciardi, and J. Robert Grove. 2011. Personality traits and relationship perceptions in coach--athlete dyads: Do opposites really attract? Psychol. Sport Exerc. 12, 3 (June 2011), 222--230. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.11.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Gunnar Johansson. 1973. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept. Psychophys. 14, 2 (June 1973), 201--211. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03212378Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Oliver P. John, Eileen M. Donahue, and Robert L. Kentle. 1991. The Big Five Inventory--Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA, University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personlity and Social Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Donald M. Johnson. 1963. Reanalysis of experimental halo effects. J. Appl. Psychol. 47, 1 (1963), 46--47. DOI:http://dx. doi.org/10.1037/h0044759Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Adam Kendon. 1994. Do gestures communicate? A review. Res. Lang. Amp Soc. Interact. 27, 3 (1994), 175--200. DOI:http://dx. doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2703_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. David A. Kenny. 1991. A general model of consensus and accuracy in interpersonal perception. Psychol. Rev. 98, 2 (1991), 155--163. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.155Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Basel Kikhia, Miguel Gomez, Lara Lorna Jiménez, Josef Hallberg, Niklas Karvonen, and Kåre Synnes. 2014. Analyzing body movements within the laban effort framework using a single accelerometer. Sensors 14, 3 (March 2014), 5725--5741. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140305725Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Andrea Kleinsmith and Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze. 2013. Affective body expression perception and recognition: A survey. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 4, 1 (January 2013), 15--33. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.16 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Markus Koppensteiner. 2013. Motion cues that make an impression. Predicting perceived personality by minimal motion information. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49, 6 (November 2013), 1137--1143. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.08.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Markus Koppensteiner and Karl Grammer. 2010. Motion patterns in political speech and their influence on personality ratings. J. Res. Personal. 44, 3 (June 2010), 374--379. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.04.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Amanda Kraha, Heather Turner, Kim Nimon, Linda Reichwein Zientek, and Robin K. Henson. 2012. Tools to support interpreting multiple regression in the face of multicollinearity. Front. Psychol. 3 (2012), 44. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00044Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Rudolf von Laban. 1950. The Mastery of Movement on the Stage. London: MacDonald & Evans.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Frank J. Landy, Janet L. Barnes-Farrell, Robert J. Vance, and James W. Steele. 1980. Statistical control of halo error in performance ratings. J. Appl. Psychol. 65, 5 (October 1980), 501--506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Jacqyln A. Levy and Marshall P. Duke. 2003. The use of laban movement analysis in the study of personality, emotional state and movement style: An exploratory investigation of the veridicality of “Body Language.” Individ. Differ. Res. 1, 1 (April 2003), 39--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Shane Lowe and Gearóid ÓLaighin. 2012. The age of the virtual trainer. Procedia Eng. 34 (2012), 242--247. DOI:http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.04.042Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Geoff Luck, Suvi Saarikallio, Birgitta Burger, Marc R. Thompson, and Petri Toiviainen. 2010. Effects of the Big Five and musical genre on music-induced movement. J. Res. Personal. 44, 6 (December 2010), 714--720. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.10.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Elizabeth J. Lyons, Deborah F. Tate, Dianne S. Ward, Kurt M. Ribisl, J. Michael Bowling, and Sriram Kalyanaraman. 2014. Engagement, enjoyment, and energy expenditure during active video game play. Health Psychol. Off. J. Div. Health Psychol. Am. Psychol. Assoc. 33, 2 (February 2014), 174--181. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031947Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. John McGowan and John Gormly. 1976. Validation of personality traits: A multicriteria approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 34, 5 (1976), 791--795. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.5.791Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Marco de Meijer. 1989. The contribution of general features of body movement to the attribution of emotions. J. Nonverbal Behav. 13, 4 (December 1989), 247--268. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00990296Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Joann Montepare, Elissa Koff, Deborah Zaitchik, and Marilyn Albert. 1999. The use of body movements and gestures as cues to emotions in younger and older adults. J. Nonverbal Behav. 23, 2 (June 1999), 133--152. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021435526134Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Joann M. Montepare and Heidi Dobish. 2003. The contribution of emotion perceptions and their overgeneralizations to trait impressions. J. Nonverbal Behav. 27, 4 (December 2003), 237--254. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1027332800296Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Carey K. Morewedge and Daniel Kahneman. 2010. Associative processes in intuitive judgment. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 10 (October 2010), 435--440. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Shinichi Nakagawa. 2004. A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav. Ecol. 15, 6 (November 2004), 1044--1045. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh107Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Laura P. Naumann, Simine Vazire, Peter J. Rentfrow, and Samuel D. Gosling. 2009. Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. (September 2009). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167209346309Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. L. Ouss, S. Carton, Roland Jouvent, and D. Widloêcher. 1990. Traduction et validation de l’échelle d’émotions différentielle d’Izard: exploration de la qualification verbale des émotions. Encéphale 16, 6 (1990), 453--458.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Catherine Pelachaud. 2009. Studies on gesture expressivity for a virtual agent. Speech Commun. 51, 7 (July 2009), 630--639. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2008.04.009 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Paolo Petta, Catherine Pelachaud, and Roddy Cowie. 2011. Emotion-Oriented Systems - The Humaine Handbook. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Philippe J. Rushton, Douglas N. Jackson, and Sampo V. Paunonen. 1981. Personality: Nomothetic or idiographic? A response to Kenrick and Stringfield. Psychol. Rev. 88, 6 (1981), 582--589. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.6.582Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Odile Plaisant, Robert Courtois, Christian Réveillère, Gerald Mendelson, and Olivier John. 2010. Validation par analyse factorielle du Big Five Inventory français (BFI-Fr). Analyse convergente avec le NEO-PI-R. Annales Medico-Psychologiques, 168, 2, (2010), 97--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Philip M. Podsakoff, Scott B. MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon Lee, and Nathan P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 5 (October 2003), 879--903. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Frank E. Pollick, Helena M. Paterson, Armin Bruderlin, and Anthony J. Sanford. 2001. Perceiving affect from arm movement. Cognition 82, 2 (December 2001), B51--B61. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00147-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Thomas D. Raedeke. 2007. The relationship between enjoyment and affective responses to exercise. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 19, 1 (2007), 105--115. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10413200601113638Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Heidi R. Riggio and Ronald E. Riggio. 2002. Emotional expressiveness, extraversion, and neuroticism: A meta-analysis. J. Nonverbal Behav. 26, 4 (December 2002), 195--218. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022117500440Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Claire L. Roether, Lars Omlor, Andrea Christensen, and Martin A. Giese. 2009. Critical features for the perception of emotion from gait. J. Vis. 9, 6 (June 2009), 15. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/9.6.15Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Robert Rosenthal. 2008. Conducting judgment studies. In The New Handbook of Methods in Nonverbal Behavior Research. Jinni Harrigan, Robert Rosenthal, & Klaus Scherer, eds. Oxford University Press, 199--234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Sverker Runeson and Gunilla Frykholm. 1983. Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 112, 4 (1983), 585--615. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.112.4.585Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. James A. Russell and Albert Mehrabian. 1977. Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions. J. Res. Personal. 11, 3 (September 1977), 273--294. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(77)90037-XGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Ali A. Samadani, Sarahjane Burton, Rob Gorbet, and Dana Kulic. 2013. Laban effort and shape analysis of affective hand and arm movements. In 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII). 343--348. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2013.63 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Klaus R. Scherer. 2010. Emotion and emotional competence: conceptual and theoretical issues for modelling agents. In Blueprint for Affective Computing, A Sourcebook. Oxford University Press, 3--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Klaus R. Scherer. 1978. Personality inference from voice quality: The loud voice of extroversion. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 8, 4 (October 1978), 467--487. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420080405Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. Klaus R. Scherer. 2013. Vocal markers of emotion: Comparing induction and acting elicitation. Comput. Speech Lang. 27, 1 (January 2013), 40--58. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2011.11.003 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Maxine Sheets-Johnstone. 1999. The Primacy of Movement. John Benjamins Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Nao Shikanai, Misako Sawada, and Motonobu Ishii. 2013. Development of the movements impressions emotions model: Evaluation of movements and impressions related to the perception of emotions in dance. J. Nonverbal Behav. 37, 2 (June 2013), 107--121. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10919-013-0148-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. John C. Thoresen, Quoc C. Vuong, and Anthony P. Atkinson. 2012. First impressions: Gait cues drive reliable trait judgements. Cognition 124, 3 (September 2012), 261--271. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. Edward L. Thorndike. 1920. A constant error in psychological ratings. J. Appl. Psychol. 4, 1 (1920), 25--29. DOI:http://dx. doi.org/10.1037/h0071663Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Joëlle Tilmanne and Thierry Dutoit. 2012. Continuous control of style and style transitions through linear interpolation in hidden Markov model based walk synthesis. In Transactions on Computational Science XVI. Marina L. Gavrilova & C. J. Kenneth Tan, eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 34--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Allessandro Vinciarelli and Gelareh Mohammadi. 2014. A survey of personality computing. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 5, 3 (July 2014), 273--291. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2014.2330816Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Harald G. Wallbott. 1998. Bodily expression of emotion. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 28, 6 (November 1998), 879--896. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(1998110)28:6<879::AID-EJSP901>3.0.CO;2-WGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. Harald G. Wallbott. 1985. Hand movement quality: A neglected aspect of nonverbal behavior in clinical judgment and person perception. J. Clin. Psychol. 41, 3 (May 1985), 345--359. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198505)41:3<345::AID-JCLP2270410307>3.0.CO;2-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. Leslie A. Zebrowitz, Masako Kikuchi, and Jean-Marc Fellous. 2007. Are effects of emotion expression on trait impressions mediated by babyfaceness? Evidence from connectionist modeling. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. (April 2007). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167206297399Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Perception of Emotion and Personality through Full-Body Movement Qualities: A Sport Coach Case Study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
      ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 13, Issue 1
      December 2015
      112 pages
      ISSN:1544-3558
      EISSN:1544-3965
      DOI:10.1145/2837040
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 October 2015
      • Accepted: 1 June 2015
      • Revised: 1 April 2015
      • Received: 1 November 2014
      Published in tap Volume 13, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader