skip to main content
10.1145/2793107.2793125acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-playConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Increasing Donating Behavior Through a Game for Change: The Role of Interactivity and Appreciation

Published: 05 October 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Games for change have attracted the interest of humanitarian aid organizations and researchers alike. However, their effectiveness to promote behavior such as donating remains unclear. Furthermore, little is known about how key game properties interactivity and presentation mode impact the effectiveness of these games, or how player attitudes and experiences relate to the interplay between game properties and donating behavior. In this study, experimental conditions were systematically varied in their interactivity and presentation mode. Thereby, 234 participants played, watched, or read through one of six variations of the narrative of the game Darfur is Dying. Following this, they were asked to choose the percentage of an unexpected bonus to donate to a charity. While interactivity increased donating by an average of 12%, presentation mode had no significant impact on the percentage donated. Thus, between presentation mode and interactivity, interactivity was found to be the more impactful game property. Moreover, appreciation fully mediated the relationship between interactivity and donating, hinting at its relevance for the evaluation of the effectiveness of games for change.

References

[1]
Ajzen, I. Attitudes, personality and behaviour. McGraw-Hill International, 2005.
[2]
Andersen, M. H., Mathisen, L., Øyen, O., Wahl, A. K., Hanestad, B. R., and Fosse, E. Living donors' experiences 1 wk after donating a kidney. Clinical transplantation 19, 1 (2005), 90--96.
[3]
Apter, M. J., Spirn, N., Sveback, S., and Apter, M. Motives for donating blood. Stress and health: A reversal theory perspective (1997), 145--156.
[4]
Baddeley, A. Working memory. Science 255, 5044 (1992), 556--559.
[5]
Bartsch, A., and Hartmann, T. The role of cognitive and affective challenge in entertainment experience. Communication Research (2015), 0093650214565921.
[6]
Bartsch, A., Kalch, A., and Oliver, M. B. Moved to think: The role of emotional media experiences in stimulating reflective thoughts. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications 26, 3 (2014), 125.
[7]
Bogost, I. Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. Mit Press, 2007.
[8]
Bopp, J. A., Mekler, E. D., and Opwis, K. It was sad but still good: Gratifications of emotionally moving game experiences. In Ext. Abstracts CHI '15, ACM (2015), 1193--1198.
[9]
Chatterjee, P., Rose, R. L., and Sinha, J. Why money meanings matter in decisions to donate time and money. Marketing Letters 24, 2 (2013), 109--118.
[10]
Cho, J. Disentangling media effects from debate effects: The presentation mode of televised debates and viewer decision making. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 86, 2 (2009), 383--400.
[11]
Clark, J. House money effects in public good experiments. Experimental Economics 5, 3 (2002), 223--231.
[12]
Cohen, E. L. What makes good games go viral? the role of technology use, ef?cacy, emotion and enjoyment in players' decision to share a prosocial digital game. Computers in Human Behavior 33 (2014), 321--329.
[13]
Cohen, J. Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society 4, 3 (2001), 245--264.
[14]
Coutu, W. Role-playing vs. role-taking: An appeal for clarification. American Sociological Review (1951), 180--187.
[15]
Davis, M. H. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of personality and social psychology 44, 1 (1983), 113.
[16]
DeScioli, P., Massenkoff, M., Shaw, A., Petersen, M. B., and Kurzban, R. Equity or equality? moral judgments follow the money. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281, 1797 (2014).
[17]
Eisenberg, N., and Miller, P. A. The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological bulletin 101, 1 (1987), 91.
[18]
Fazio, R. H. Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The mode model as an integrative framework. Advances in experimental social psychology 23 (1990), 75--109.
[19]
Gee, J. P. Deep learning properties of good digital games: How far can they go. Serious games: Mechanisms and effects (2009), 67--82.
[20]
Gerling, K. M., Mandryk, R. L., Birk, M. V., Miller, M., and Orji, R. The effects of embodied persuasive games on player attitudes toward people using wheelchairs. In Proc. CHI '14, ACM (2014), 3413--3422.
[21]
Iacovides, I., and Cox, A. L. Moving beyond fun: Evaluating serious experience in digital games. In Proc. CHI '15, ACM (2015), 2245--2254.
[22]
Klimmt, C. Serious games and social change: Why they (should) work. Routledge, 2009, 248--270.
[23]
Klimmt, C., Hartmann, T., and Frey, A. Effectance and control as determinants of video game enjoyment. Cyberpsychology & behavior 10, 6 (2007), 845--848.
[24]
Lin, J.-H. Do video games exert stronger effects on aggression than film? the role of media interactivity and identification on the association of violent content and aggressive outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 3 (2013), 535--543.
[25]
Marsh, T., and Costello, B. Experience in serious games: between positive and serious experience. In Serious Games Development and Applications. Springer, 2012, 255--267.
[26]
Mayer, R. E. Multimedia learning and games. Computer games and instruction (2011), 281--305.
[27]
Mekler, E. D., Bopp, J. A., Tuch, A. N., and Opwis, K. A systematic review of quantitative studies on the enjoyment of digital entertainment games. In Proc. CHI '14, ACM (2014), 927--936.
[28]
Mitgutsch, K., and Alvarado, N. Purposeful by design?: a serious game design assessment framework. In Proc. FDG '12, ACM (2012), 121--128.
[29]
Montfort, N. Twisty Little Passages: an approach to interactive fiction. Mit Press, 2005.
[30]
Myrick, J. G., and Oliver, M. B. Laughing and crying: Mixed emotions, compassion, and the effectiveness of a youtube psa about skin cancer. Health communication, ahead-of-print (2014), 1--10.
[31]
Neys, J., and Jansz, J. Political internet games: Engaging an audience. European Journal of Communication 25, 3 (2010), 227--241.
[32]
Nummenmaa, L., and Niemi, P. Inducing affective states with success-failure manipulations: a meta-analysis. Emotion 4, 2 (2004), 207.
[33]
Oliver, M. B., and Bartsch, A. Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research 36, 1 (2010), 53--81.
[34]
Peng, W., Lee, M., and Heeter, C. The effects of a serious game on role-taking and willingness to help. Journal of Communication 60, 4 (2010), 723--742.
[35]
Ratan, R., and Ritterfeld, U. Classifying serious games. Serious games: Mechanisms and effects (2009), 10--24.
[36]
Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M., and Vorderer, P. Serious games: Mechanisms and effects. Routledge, 2009.
[37]
Ritterfeld, U., Shen, C., Wang, H., Nocera, L., and Wong, W. L. Multimodality and interactivity: Connecting properties of serious games with educational outcomes. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 12, 6 (2009), 691--697.
[38]
Ruggiero, D. The effect of a persuasive social impact game on affective learning and attitude. Computers in Human Behavior 45 (2015), 213--221.
[39]
Stoianova, V. Private funding: An emerging trend in humanitarian donorship. Global Humanitarian Assistance (2012).
[40]
Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., and Paas, F. G. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review 10, 3 (1998), 251--296.
[41]
Tsvetkova, M., and Macy, M. W. The social contagion of generosity. PloS one 9, 2 (2014), e87275.
[42]
Van Wassenhove, L. N. Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57, 5 (2006), 475--489.
[43]
Wilson, G. V., and Kerr, J. H. Affective responses to success and failure:: a study of winning and losing in competitive rugby. Personality and Individual Differences 27, 1 (1999), 85--99.
[44]
Wouters, P., Van Nimwegen, C., Van Oostendorp, H., and Van Der Spek, E. D. A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology 105, 2 (2013), 249.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Nudging with Narrative Visualization: Communicating to a Young Adult Audience in the PandemicProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869508:CSCW2(1-21)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Pseudo-Scientist: Towards Narrative Interventions for Imposter SyndromeProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36770998:CHI PLAY(1-29)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Virtual Rewards, Real World Impact? Investigating the Prosocial Effects of Videogame Reward SalienceInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2425730(1-22)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Increasing Donating Behavior Through a Game for Change: The Role of Interactivity and Appreciation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI PLAY '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
      October 2015
      852 pages
      ISBN:9781450334662
      DOI:10.1145/2793107
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 05 October 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Badges

      • Best Paper

      Author Tags

      1. appreciation
      2. donating
      3. games for change
      4. persuasive games

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • Fakultät für Psychologie der Universität Basel

      Conference

      CHI PLAY '15
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI PLAY '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 40 of 144 submissions, 28%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 421 of 1,386 submissions, 30%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)207
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)28
      Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Nudging with Narrative Visualization: Communicating to a Young Adult Audience in the PandemicProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869508:CSCW2(1-21)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
      • (2024)Pseudo-Scientist: Towards Narrative Interventions for Imposter SyndromeProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36770998:CHI PLAY(1-29)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Virtual Rewards, Real World Impact? Investigating the Prosocial Effects of Videogame Reward SalienceInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2425730(1-22)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2024
      • (2024)Unravelling the Educational Power of Interactive Digital Narratives in Childhood LearningInteractive Storytelling10.1007/978-3-031-78453-8_12(181-198)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2024
      • (2024)Fostering Empathy Through Inclusive Interactive Digital NarrativesInteractive Storytelling10.1007/978-3-031-78450-7_16(224-231)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2024
      • (2023)An evaluation of the license to save lives program to promote organ, eye, and tissue donation among teenagersClinical Transplantation10.1111/ctr.1518338:1Online publication date: 9-Nov-2023
      • (2023)HELP! It's up to YOU to DONATE - A Structured Literature Review on Conversational Agents and Promoting Donation Behavior2023 Fourth International Conference on Information Systems and Software Technologies (ICI2ST)10.1109/ICI2ST62251.2023.00013(39-45)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2023
      • (2023)The Chronicles of ChatGPT: Generating and Evaluating Visual Novel Narratives on Climate Change Through ChatGPTInteractive Storytelling10.1007/978-3-031-47658-7_16(181-194)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2023
      • (2022)Conceptualizing the Roles of Involvement and Immersion in Persuasive GamesGames and Culture10.1177/1555412021104957617:5(703-720)Online publication date: 30-Mar-2022
      • (2022)Audio Matters Too: How Audial Avatar Customization Enhances Visual Avatar CustomizationProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501848(1-27)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Login options

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media