skip to main content
10.1145/2800795.2800808acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnanocomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Data Rate Performance of Droplet Microfluidic Communication System

Published: 21 September 2015 Publication History

Abstract

We develop a microfluidic communication system prototype and conduct experiments to show the feasibility of data transmission. We apply using on/off keying and communication by silence modulation schemes for signal transmission. Their performance is evaluated by using data obtained experimentally. The data rate of these modulation schemes is computed as well. We identify the noise sources in microfluidic channels as setup related. The experiments reveal that communication by silence is significantly better than on/off keying. Our results show that both modulation schemes are feasible for signal transmission. Even though CtS outperforms OOK in terms of achievable data rate, from a practical point of view CtS is much harder to control, since there are more parameters to be controlled at the same time.

References

[1]
A. Biral and A. Zanella. Introducing purely hydrodynamic networking functionalities into microfluidic systems. Nano Communication Networks, 4(4):205--215, 2013.
[2]
Y. P. Chen, D. Wang, and J. Zhang. Variable-base tacit communication: a new energy efficient communication scheme for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the first international conference on Integrated internet ad hoc and sensor networks, page 27, 2006.
[3]
E. De Leo, L. Donvito, L. Galluccio, A. Lombardo, G. Morabito, and L. M. Zanoli. Communications and switching in microfluidic systems: Pure hydrodynamic control for networking labs-on-a-chip. IEEE transactions on communications, 61(11):4663--4677, 2013.
[4]
E. De Leo, L. Galluccio, A. Lombardo, and G. Morabito. On the feasibility of using microfluidic technologies for communications in labs-on-a-chip. In Communications (ICC), 2012 IEEE International Conference on, pages 2526--2530. IEEE, 2012.
[5]
M. J. Fuerstman, P. Garstecki, and G. M. Whitesides. Coding/decoding and reversibility of droplet trains in microfluidic networks. Science, 315(5813):828--832, 2007.
[6]
F. Kong, X. Zhang, and M. Hai. Microfluidics fabrication of monodisperse biocompatible phospholipid vesicles for encapsulation and delivery of hydrophilic drug or active compound. Langmuir, 30(13):3905--3912, 2014.
[7]
Y. Liu, M. Tian, and H. Zhang. Microfluidics for synthesis of peptide-based pet tracers. BioMed research international, 2013, 2013.
[8]
S. J. Tan, H. Phan, B. M. Gerry, A. Kuhn, L. Z. Hong, Y. M. Ong, P. S. Y. Poon, M. A. Unger, R. C. Jones, S. R. Quake, et al. A microfluidic device for preparing next generation dna sequencing libraries and for automating other laboratory protocols that require one or more column chromatography steps. PloS one, 8(7):e64084, 2013.
[9]
P.-H. Yuh, C.-L. Yang, and Y.-W. Chang. BioRoute: A network-flow-based routing algorithm for the synthesis of digital microfluidic biochips. IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 27(11):1928--1941, 2008.
[10]
Y. Zhu and R. Sivakumar. Challenges: communication through silence in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 11th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, pages 140--147, 2005.

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Performance Comparison of Information Encoding in Droplet-Based Microfluidic SystemsProceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication10.1145/2967446.2967483(1-2)Online publication date: 28-Sep-2016

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
NANOCOM' 15: Proceedings of the Second Annual International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication
September 2015
186 pages
ISBN:9781450336741
DOI:10.1145/2800795
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 September 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • FiDiPro program of Academy of Finland Nanocommunication Networks

Conference

NANOCOM' 15

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 97 of 135 submissions, 72%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Performance Comparison of Information Encoding in Droplet-Based Microfluidic SystemsProceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication10.1145/2967446.2967483(1-2)Online publication date: 28-Sep-2016

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media