skip to main content
10.1145/2800835.2804401acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Keeping it private: an augmented reality approach to citizen participation with public displays

Published: 07 September 2015 Publication History

Abstract

With the availability of displays in public space increasing, they have been proposed and studied as platform for civic engagement. Due to their situated nature, public displays have the potential to enable a larger cross-section of the public to participate in community consultation processes, compared to focus groups or online surveys. Previous research has investigated a range of interaction methods for enabling this form of citizen participation with public displays. Through an analysis of related work we identified four main categories of interaction methods: remote indirect, kiosk, mid-air gestural and mobile. In this paper we propose a formerly introduced interaction method, based upon mobile augmented reality, which promises to enable pervasive participation by making interactions more private and simultaneous, through a familiar and convenient interface.

References

[1]
Ackad, C., Wasinger, R., Gluga, R., Kay, J. and Tomitsch, M. 2013. Measuring Interactivity at an Interactive Public Information Display. In Proc. OzCHI 2013, 329--332.
[2]
Alt, F., Kubitza, T., Bial, D., Zaidan, F., Ortel, M., Zurmaar, B., Lewen, T., Sahami Shirazi, A. and Schmidt, A. 2011. Digifieds: Insights into Deploying Digital Public Notice Areas in the Wild. In Proc. MUM 2011, 165--174.
[3]
Baldauf, M., Lasinger, K. and Frohlich, P. 2012. Private Public Screens -- Detached Multi-User Interaction with Large Displays through Mobile Augmented Reality. In Proc. MUM 2012.
[4]
Baldauf, M., Lasinger, K. and Frohlich, P. 2012. Real-World Drag ' n ' Drop - Bidirectional Camera-based Media Transfer between Smartphones and Large Displays Handheld-based Screen Interaction. In Proc. Pervasive 2012.
[5]
Brignull, H. and Rogers, Y. 2003. Enticing People to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces. In Proc. INTERACT 2003.
[6]
Hespanhol, L., Tomitsch, M., McArthur, I., Fredericks, J., Schroeter, R. and Foth, M. 2015. Vote As You Go: Blending Interfaces For Community Engagement Into The Urban Space. In Proc. Communities & Technologies 2015.
[7]
Kostakos, V. and Ojala, T. 2013. Public Displays Invade Urban Spaces. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 12(1), 8--13.
[8]
Michelis, D. and Müller, J. 2011. The Audience Funnel: Observations of Gesture Based Interaction With Multiple Large Displays in a City Center. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(6), 562--579.
[9]
Munson, S., Rosengren, E. and Resnick, P. 2011. Thanks and Tweets: Comparing Two Public Displays. CSCW 2011, 331--340.
[10]
Qualcomm. 2014. Vuforia Augmented Reality for 3D Mobile Content | Qualcomm Vuforia. Retrieved June 16, 2015 from: https://www.qualcomm.com/products/vuforia
[11]
Schroeter, R. and Foth, M. 2009. Discussions in space. In Proc. OZCHI '09.
[12]
Steinberger, F., Foth, M. and Alt, F. 2014. Vote With Your Feet: Local Community Polling on Urban Screens. In Proc. PerDis '14,1--6.
[13]
Tomitsch, M., Ackad, C., Dawson, O., Hespanhol, L. and Kay, J. 2014. Who cares about the Content? An Analysis of Playful Behaviour at a Public Display. In Proc. PerDis'14.
[14]
Valkanova, N., Walter, R., Vande Moere, A. and Muller, J. 2014. MyPosition: Sparking Civic Discourse by a Public Interactive Poll Visualization. In Proc. CSCW '14.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)E-participation in energy transitions: What does it mean? Chances and challenges within Germany's EnergiewendeTechnological Forecasting and Social Change10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123839210(123839)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2023)Simulating Wearable Urban Augmented Reality Experiences in VR: Lessons Learnt from Designing Two Future Urban InterfacesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti70200217:2(21)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2023
  • (2023)Designing Media Architecture for Digital Placemaking on Campus: Motivation, Implementation and Preliminary InsightsProceedings of the 6th Media Architecture Biennale Conference10.1145/3627611.3627615(38-46)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Keeping it private: an augmented reality approach to citizen participation with public displays

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp/ISWC'15 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
      September 2015
      1626 pages
      ISBN:9781450335751
      DOI:10.1145/2800835
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 07 September 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. civic computing
      2. community engagement
      3. mobile augmented reality
      4. pervasive displays
      5. pervasive participation

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      UbiComp '15
      Sponsor:
      • Yahoo! Japan
      • SIGMOBILE
      • FX Palo Alto Laboratory, Inc.
      • ACM
      • Rakuten Institute of Technology
      • Microsoft
      • Bell Labs
      • SIGCHI
      • Panasonic
      • Telefónica
      • ISTC-PC

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 764 of 2,912 submissions, 26%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
      Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2025)E-participation in energy transitions: What does it mean? Chances and challenges within Germany's EnergiewendeTechnological Forecasting and Social Change10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123839210(123839)Online publication date: Jan-2025
      • (2023)Simulating Wearable Urban Augmented Reality Experiences in VR: Lessons Learnt from Designing Two Future Urban InterfacesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti70200217:2(21)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2023
      • (2023)Designing Media Architecture for Digital Placemaking on Campus: Motivation, Implementation and Preliminary InsightsProceedings of the 6th Media Architecture Biennale Conference10.1145/3627611.3627615(38-46)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2023
      • (2021)Articulating and Negotiating Boundaries in Urban Farming CommunitiesProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Wicked Problems in the Age of Tech10.1145/3461564.3461565(296-308)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2021
      • (2020)Iterative Prototyping of Urban CoBuilder: Tracking Methods and User Interface of an Outdoor Mobile Augmented Reality Tool for Co-DesigningMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti40200264:2(26)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2020
      • (2018)Does the Public Still Look at Public Displays?Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/32142762:2(1-24)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2018
      • (2018)Device-freeProceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference10.1145/3167918.3167959(1-8)Online publication date: 29-Jan-2018
      • (2017)Bridging the interaction gulfProceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/3152771.3156162(482-486)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2017
      • (2017)When Smart Devices Interact With Pervasive ScreensACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications10.1145/311593313:4(1-23)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2017
      • (2016)Design implications for interacting with personalised public displays through mobile augmented realityProceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays10.1145/2914920.2915016(52-58)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2016
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media