skip to main content
10.1145/2806416.2806644acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Heterogeneous Multi-task Semantic Feature Learning for Classification

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 October 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Multi-task Learning (MTL) aims to learn multiple related tasks simultaneously instead of separately to improve generalization performance of each task. Most existing MTL methods assumed that the multiple tasks to be learned have the same feature representation. However, this assumption may not hold for many real-world applications. In this paper, we study the problem of MTL with heterogeneous features for each task. To address this problem, we first construct an integrated graph of a set of bipartite graphs to build a connection among different tasks. We then propose a multi-task nonnegative matrix factorization (MTNMF) method to learn a common semantic feature space underlying different heterogeneous feature spaces of each task. Finally, based on the common semantic features and original heterogeneous features, we model the heterogenous MTL problem as a multi-task multi-view learning (MTMVL) problem. In this way, a number of existing MTMVL methods can be applied to solve the problem effectively. Extensive experiments on three real-world problems demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method.

References

  1. R. K. Ando and T. Zhang. A framework for learning predictive structures from multiple tasks and unlabeled data. JMLR, 6:01, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Argyriou, T. Evgeniou, and M. Pontil. Multi-task feature learning. In NIPS, pages 41--48, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Bickel. Ecml-pkdd discovery challenge 2006 overview. In ECML-PKDD Discovery Challenge Workshop, pages 1--9, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Blitzer, M. Dredze, and F. Pereira. Biographies, bollywood, boom-boxes and blenders: Domain adaptation for sentiment classification. In ACL, pages 440--447, Prague, Czech republic, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. R. Caruana. Multitask learning. Machine learning, 28(1):41--75, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Chen, L. Tang, J. Liu, and J. Ye. A convex formulation for learning shared structures from multiple tasks. In ICML, pages 137--144, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Chen, J. Zhou, and J. Ye. Integrating low-rank and group-sparse structures for robust multi-task learning. In ACM SIGKDD, pages 42--50, San Diego, CA, United states, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. W. Dai, Y. Chen, G.-R. Xue, Q. Yang, and Y. Yu. Translated learning: Transfer learning across different feature spaces. In NIPS, pages 353--360, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Ding, T. Li, W. Peng, and H. Park. Orthogonal nonnegative matrix t-factorizations for clustering. In ACM SIGKDD, pages 126--135. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. L. Duan, D. Xu, and I. W. Tsang. Learning with augmented features for heterogeneous domain adaptation. In ICML, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. Evgeniou and M. Pontil. Regularized multi-task learning. In ACM SIGKDD, pages 109--117, Seattle, WA, United states, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Gong, J. Ye, and C. Zhang. Robust multi-task feature learning. In ACM SIGKDD, pages 895--903. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. He and R. Lawrence. A graph-based framework for multi-task multi-view learning. In ICML, pages 25--32, Bellevue, WA, United states, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. He, Y. Liu, and Q. Yang. Linking heterogeneous input spaces with pivots for multi-task learning. In SDM, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A. Jalali, P. Ravikumar, S. Sanghavi, and C. Ruan. A dirty model for multi-task learning. In NIPS, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. X. Jin, F. Zhuang, S. Wang, Q. He, and Z. Shi. Shared structure learning for multiple tasks with multiple views. In ECML PKDD, volume 8189 LNAI, pages 353--368, Prague, Czech republic, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. X. Jin, F. Zhuang, H. Xiong, C. Du, P. Luo, and Q. He. Multi-task multi-view learning for heterogeneous tasks. In CIKM, pages 441--450, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. T. Joachims. Transductive inference for text classification using support vector machines. In ICML, pages 200--209, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Z. Kang, K. Grauman, and F. Sha. Learning with whom to share in multi-task feature learning. In ICML, pages 521--528, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. G.-J. Qi, C. Aggarwal, and T. Huang. Towards semantic knowledge propagation from text corpus to web images. In WWW, pages 297--306. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. G. Skolidis and G. Sanguinetti. Bayesian multitask classification with gaussian process priors. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 22(12):2011--2021, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. S. Yu, V. Tresp, and K. Yu. Robust multi-task learning with t-processes. In ICML, volume 227, pages 1103--1110, Corvalis, OR, United states, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J. Zhang and J. Huan. Inductive multi-task learning with multiple view data. In ACM SIGKDD, pages 543--551, Beijing, China, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Y. Zhang and D.-Y. Yeung. Multi-task learning in heterogeneous feature spaces. In AAAI, volume 1, pages 574--579, San Francisco, CA, United states, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Y. Zhu, Y. Chen, Z. Lu, S. J. Pan, G.-R. Xue, Y. Yu, and Q. Yang. Heterogeneous transfer learning for image classification. In AAAI, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Heterogeneous Multi-task Semantic Feature Learning for Classification

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '15: Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
      October 2015
      1998 pages
      ISBN:9781450337946
      DOI:10.1145/2806416

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 October 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      CIKM '15 Paper Acceptance Rate165of646submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader