ABSTRACT
Signaling networks play a key role in almost all cellular functions and cell's response to extracellular stimuli. Constructing the topology of interactions that make up signaling networks is of utmost importance to understand how these networks function. Knockdown assays, such as RNA interference (RNAi) technology, provides us hints about the roles of individual genes involved in these networks. However, determining the correct topology of interactions between these genes remains to be challenging. Existing computational approaches are either not scalable to large networks, or they have low accuracies. In this study, we consider that problem of constructing signaling network topology from single gene knockdown experiments. We formulate this mathematically as a network editing problem and develop an efficient algorithm to solve this problem. The key contribution in this paper is that our formulation can integrate the knowledge available in the form of the topologies of an arbitrary number of reference networks. Our experiments on synthetic, semi-synthetic and real datasets demonstrate that the proposed method greatly outperforms the state of the art methods, which are limited to a single reference network, in terms of accuracy with negligible increase in computational cost. Furthermore, our experiments suggest that the accuracy of our method remains high even when evolutionarily distant reference networks are used. Application of our method to the Apoptosis and Wnt signaling pathways recovers a large number of known protein-protein interactions.
- Phylip. http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html. Accessed: 2015-01-05.Google Scholar
- M. Böck, S. Ogishima, H. Tanaka, S. Kramer, and L. Kaderali. Hub-centered gene network reconstruction using automatic relevance determination. PLoS One, 7(5):e35077, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. S. Böck. An algorithm for profile and wavefront reduction of sparse matrices. Intl J. Numerical Methods in Eng, 23(5):239--251, 1986.Google Scholar
- A. Bonni, A. Brunet, A. E. West, S. R. Datta, M. A. Takasu, and M. E. Greenberg. Cell survival promoted by the ras-mapk signaling pathway by transcription-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Science, 286(5443):1358--1362, Nov 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Boutros, A. A. Kiger, S. Armknecht, K. Kerr, M. Hild, B. Koch, S. A. Haas, R. Paro, N. Perrimon, and H. F. A. C. Genome-wide RNAi analysis of growth and viability in drosophila cells. Science, 303(5659):832--835, Feb 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. L. Brass, D. M. Dykxhoorn, Y. Benita, N. Yan, A. Engelman, R. J. Xavier, J. Lieberman, and S. J. Elledge. Identification of host proteins required for hiv infection through a functional genomic screen. Science, 319(5865):921--926, Feb 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Chang and M. Karin. Mammalian map kinase signalling cascades. Nature, 410(6824):37--40, Mar 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Deng, F. Sun, and T. Chen. Assessment of the reliability of protein-protein interactions and protein function prediction. In Pac. Symp. Biocomputing, pages 140--151, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Fire, S. Xu, M. K. Montgomery, S. A. Kostas, S. E. Driver, and C. C. Mello. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in caenorhabditis elegans. Nature, 391(6669):806--811, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Friedman and N. Perrimon. A functional RNAi screen for regulators of receptor tyrosine kinase and erk signalling. Nature, 444(7116):230--234, Nov 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. E. Furlong. A functional genomics approach to identify new regulators of wnt signaling. Dev Cell, 8(5):624--626, May 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Hashemikhabir, E. S. Ayaz, Y. Kavurucu, T. Can, and T. Kahveci. Large-scale signaling network reconstruction. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (TCBB), 9(6):1696--1708, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Hunter. Signaling--2000 and beyond. Cell, 100(1):113--127, Jan 2000.Google Scholar
- L. Kaderali, E. Dazert, U. Zeuge, M. Frese, and R. Bartenschlager. Reconstructing signaling pathways from RNAi data using probabilistic boolean threshold networks. Bioinformatics, 25(17):2229--2235, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Kaderali and N. Radde. Inferring gene regulatory networks from expression data. In Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics, pages 33--74. Springer, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Kanehisa and S. Goto. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Research, 28(1):27--30, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Knapp and L. Kaderali. Reconstruction of cellular signal transduction networks using perturbation assays and linear programming. PloS one, 8(7):e69220, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. N. Krishnan, A. Ng, B. Sukumaran, F. D. Gilfoy, P. D. Uchil, H. Sultana, A. L. Brass, R. Adametz, M. Tsui, F. Qian, R. R. Montgomery, S. Lev, P. W. Mason, R. A. Koski, S. J. Elledge, R. J. Xavier, H. Agaisse, and E. Fikrig. RNA interference screen for human genes associated with west nile virus infection. Nature, 455(7210):242--245, Sep 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Lan, I. Y. Smoly, G. Rapaport, S. Lindquist, E. Fraenkel, and E. Yeger-Lotem. Responsenet: revealing signaling and regulatory networks linking genetic and transcriptomic screening data. Nucleic Acids Res, 39(Web Server issue):W424--W429, Jul 2011.Google Scholar
- J. Mazur, D. Ritter, G. Reinelt, and L. Kaderali. Reconstructing nonlinear dynamic models of gene regulation using stochastic sampling. BMC Bioinformatics, 10:448, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Milo, N. Kashtan, S. Itzkovitz, M. Newman, and U. Alon. On the uniform generation of random graphs with prescribed degree sequences. arXiv preprint cond-mat/0312028, 2003.Google Scholar
- J. Moffat and D. M. Sabatini. Building mammalian signalling pathways with RNAi screens. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 7(3):177--187, Mar 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- O. Ourfali, T. Shlomi, T. Ideker, E. Ruppin, and R. Sharan. Spine: a framework for signaling-regulatory pathway inference from cause-effect experiments. Bioinformatics, 23(13):i359--i366, Jul 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O. E. Ozsoy and T. Can. A divide and conquer approach for construction of large-scale signaling networks from ppi and RNAi data using linear programming. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 10(4):869--883, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Polakis. The many ways of wnt in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 17(1):45--51, Feb 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Albert and A.-L.Barabási. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(47), 2002.Google Scholar
- J. Scott, T. Ideker, R. M. Karp, and R. Sharan. Efficient algorithms for detecting signaling pathways in protein interaction networks. J Comput Biol, 13(2):133--144, Mar 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Singh. Algorithms for the analysis of protein interaction networks. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Theis and F. Buchholz. High-throughput RNAi screening in mammalian cells with esiRNAs. Methods, 53(4):424--429, Apr 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. D. Thompson, D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic acids research, 22(22):4673--4680, Nov. 1994.Google Scholar
- Z. Tu, C. Argmann, K. K. Wong, L. J. Mitnaul, S. Edwards, I. C. Sach, J. Zhu, and E. E. Schadt. Integrating siRNA and protein-protein interaction data to identify an expanded insulin signaling network. Genome Res, 19(6):1057--1067, Jun 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Vinayagam, U. Stelzl, R. Foulle, S. Plassmann, M. Zenkner, J. Timm, H. E. Assmus, M. A. Andrade-Navarro, and E. E. Wanker. A directed protein interaction network for investigating intracellular signal transduction. Sci Signal, 4(189):rs8, Sep 2011.Google Scholar
- T. Wada and J. M. Penninger. Mitogen-activated protein kinases in apoptosis regulation. Oncogene, 23(16):2838--2849, Apr 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. S. Wiley. Integrating multiple types of data for signaling research: challenges and opportunities. Sci Signal, 4(160):pe9, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C.-H. Yeang, T. Ideker, and T. Jaakkola. Physical network models. Journal of Computational Biology, 11(2-3):243--262, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Zhang and H. T. Liu. Mapk signal pathways in the regulation of cell proliferation in mammalian cells. Cell Res, 12(1):9--18, Mar 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Multiple reference networks improve accuracy of signaling network construction
Recommendations
Large-Scale Signaling Network Reconstruction
Reconstructing the topology of a signaling network by means of RNA interference (RNAi) technology is an underdetermined problem especially when a single gene in the network is knocked down or observed. In addition, the exponential search space limits ...
Hierarchical closeness efficiently predicts disease genes in a directed signaling network
Display Omitted Devised a novel structural measure called hierarchical closeness (HC) to rank disease risk of genes in a directed biological network.Hierarchical closeness outperforms the other well-known structural centrality measures, particularly for ...
Construction of Signaling Pathways with RNAi Data and Multiple Reference Networks
Signaling networks are involved in almost all major diseases such as cancer. As a result of this, understanding how signaling networks function is vital for finding new treatments for many diseases. Using gene knockdown assays such as RNA interference ...
Comments