skip to main content
10.1145/2814251.2814253acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessplashConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On integrating graphical and textual editors for a UML profile based domain specific language: an industrial experience

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 October 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Domain Specific Languages (DSLs) are an established means of reducing the gap between problem and solution domains. DSLs increase productivity and improve quality as they can be tailored to exactly fit the needs of the problem to be solved. A DSL can have multiple notations including textual and graphical notations. In some cases, one of these notations for a DSL is enough but there are many cases where a single notation does not suffice and there is a demand to support multiple notations for the same DSL. UML profile is one of several approaches used to define a DSL, however most UML tools only come with graphical editors. In this paper, we present our approach and industrial experience on integrating textual and graphical editors for a UML profile-based DSL. This work was conducted as part of an explorative study at Ericsson. The main aim of the study was to investigate how to introduce a textual editor to an already existing UML profile-based DSL in an Eclipse environment. We report on the challenges of integrating textual and graphical editors for UML profile-based DSLs in practice, our chosen approach, specific constraints and requirements of the study.

References

  1. A. Abouzahra, J. Bézivin, M. D. Del Fabro, and F. Jouault. A practical approach to bridging domain specific languages with UML profiles. In Proceedings of the Best Practices for Model Driven Software Development at OOPSLA, volume 5. Citeseer, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. H. Bae, K. Lee, and H. S. Chae. Modularization of the UML metamodel using model slicing. In Information Technology: New Generations, 2008. ITNG 2008. Fifth International Conference on, pages 1253–1254. IEEE, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Bergmayr, M. Wimmer, W. Retschitzegger, and U. Zdun. Taking the pick out of the bunch-type-safe shrinking of metamodels. Fachtagung des GI-Fachbereichs Softwaretechnik, page 85, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Eclipse.org. Emf compare - compare and merge your emf models, 2014. URL http://www.eclipse.org/emf/ compare/overview.html. Accessed : 2014-06-30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Eclipse.org. File:ATL EMFTVM trace.png, 2015. URL https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:ATL_EMFTVM_ Trace.png. Accessed : 2015-05-18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Efftinge. Xtext - language development made easy!, 2014. URL http://www.eclipse.org/Xtext/. Accessed: 2014-06-13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. L. Engelen and M. van den Brand. Integrating textual and graphical modelling languages. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 253(7):105–120, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gentleware.com. UML-to-ecore plug-in, 2014. URL http://www.gentleware.com/fileadmin/media/ archives/userguides/poseidon_users_guide/ ecoreguide.html. Accessed : 2014-06-30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. G. Giachetti, B. Marín, and O. Pastor. Using UML as a domain-specific modeling language: A proposal for automatic generation of UML profiles. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pages 110–124. Springer, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. Giachetti, B. Marín, and O. Pastor. Using UML profiles to interchange DSML and UML models. In Research Challenges in Information Science, 2009. RCIS 2009. Third International Conference on, pages 385–394. IEEE, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. G. Giachetti, M. Albert, B. Marín, and O. Pastor. Linking UML and MDD through UML profiles: a practical approach based on the UML association. J. UCS, 16(17):2353–2373, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. git scm.com. Git, 2014. URL http://git-scm.com/. Accessed : 2014-06-25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Github.io. Textuml toolkit, 2015. URL http://abstratt. github.io/textuml/readme.html. Accessed : 2015-06- 01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. C. Gronback. Eclipse modeling project: a domain-specific language (DSL) toolkit. Pearson Education, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H. Grönniger, H. Krahn, B. Rumpe, M. Schindler, and S. Völkel. Textbased modeling. In 4th International Workshop on Software Language Engineering, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Hudak. Domain-specific languages. Handbook of Programming Languages, 3:39–60, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. JetBrains. Jetbrains :: Meta programming system - language oriented programming environment and dsl creation tool, 2014. URL http://www.jetbrains.com/mps/. Accessed : 2014-06-15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. F. Jouault and J. Delatour. Towards fixing sketchy uml models by leveraging textual notations: Application to realtime embedded systems. In 14th International Workshop on OCL and Textual Modeling: Applications and Case Studies, pages 73–82. CEUR-WS, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. C.-L. Lazăr. Integrating alf editor with eclipse uml editors. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Informatica, 56(3), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Plaintext.com. Planttext, 2015. URL http://www. planttext.com. Accessed : 2015-06-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Plantuml.sourceforge.net. Plantuml, 2015. URL http:// plantuml.sourceforge.net. Accessed : 2015-06-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. D. S Wile. Supporting the DSL spectrum. CIT. Journal of computing and information technology, 9(4):263–287, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. M. Scheidgen. Textual modelling embedded into graphical modelling. In Model Driven Architecture–Foundations and Applications, pages 153–168. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. C. Seybold, M. Glinz, S. Meier, and N. Merlo-Schett. An effective layout adaptation technique for a graphical modeling tool. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE ’03, pages 826–827, Washington, DC, USA, 2003. IEEE Computer Society. ISBN 0-7695- 1877-X. URL http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id= 776816.776971. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. D. Steinberg, F. Budinsky, E. Merks, and M. Paternostro. EMF: Eclipse Modeling Framework. Pearson Education, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. P. Stevens. Bidirectionally tolerating inconsistency: partial transformations. In Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, pages 32–46. Springer, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. M. Voelter, D. Ratiu, B. Schaetz, and B. Kolb. mbeddr: an extensible c-based programming language and ide for embedded systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd annual conference on Systems, programming, and applications: software for humanity, pages 121–140. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. M. Voelter, J. Siegmund, T. Berger, and B. Kolb. Towards user-friendly projectional editors. In Software Language Engineering, pages 41–61. Springer, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. S. Walderhaug, E. Stav, and M. Mikalsen. Experiences from model-driven development of homecare services: UML profiles and domain models. In Models in Software Engineering, pages 199–212. Springer, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. M. Wimmer. A semi-automatic approach for bridging DSMLs with UML. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 5(3):372–404, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. www.uml diagrams.org. Activity diagrams, 2014. URL http: //www.uml-diagrams.org/activity-diagrams.html. Accessed: 2015-04-13. Introduction Industrial Case Challenges Storage and Versioning of Models in Repositories Synchronization of Models Graphical Layout of the Model and Pretty Printing Model References Minimal DSL Names in Model Elements Inconsistent Models Approach Obtaining the Text Editor Switching between Graphical and Textual Views Evaluation Discussion Addressed Challenges Proposed Solutions for Non-Addressed Challenges Related Work Graphical and Textual Editing for UML Bridging UML Profiles and Ecore DSLs Conclusion and Future WorkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. On integrating graphical and textual editors for a UML profile based domain specific language: an industrial experience

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SLE 2015: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering
      October 2015
      172 pages
      ISBN:9781450336864
      DOI:10.1145/2814251

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 October 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader