skip to main content
10.1145/2815782.2815795acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using Business Intelligence to Support Strategic Sustainability Information Management

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The concept of sustainability has become an important phenomenon globally with many organisations being affected by the heightened awareness in sustainability. Organisations are more aware of the importance of promoting sustainability in all areas of operations. This is no different in the higher education sector, with a number of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) playing a leading role in promoting sustainable initiatives. Effectively managing these initiatives however can be a complex task and requires data and information from multiple aspects of operations. In an HEI, operating sustainably means ensuring financial sustainability, social sustainability, environmental sustainability and educational sustainability. In order to manage sustainability effectively, HEIs require an integrated tool that can provide information on all areas of sustainability.

This paper highlights the importance of effectively managing sustainability information and the challenges HEIs face in sustainability reporting. Business Intelligence (BI) is a solution to overcome the challenges and effectively managing sustainability information. However, HEIs need to overcome a number of challenges associated with BI to ensure a BI solution is correctly implemented and is effective in solving the problem of effective sustainability information management. This study focusses on the management of sustainability information in South African HEIs. The results indicate that there are many challenges to managing sustainability information in South African HEIs, including siloed data and information as well as poor sharing and communication of information. These two challenges can be overcome by a correctly implemented BI solution.

References

  1. Abdelfattah, M. 2013. A Comparison of Several Performance Dashboards Architectures. Intelligent Information Management. 05, (March 2013), 35--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Adams, C. 2013. Sustainability reporting and performance management in universities: Challenges and benefits. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 4, 384--392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Analytics8 2010. Business Intelligence Project Management 101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE) 2011. Sustainability, tracking and rating system STARS. Version 1.1 Technical ManualAdministrative, Update One, September.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Baltzan, P. and Phillips, A. 2014. Business Driven Information Systems. McGraw-Hill. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bosire, S. 2014. A Sustainability Reporting Framework for a Higher Education Institution, DBA Thesis, NMMU Business School, Port Elizabeth.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyle, C. 1999. Education, sustainability and cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production. 7, 83--87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Busse, M. 2004. Transnational Corporations and Repression of Political Rights and Civil Liberties: An Empirical Analysis. KYKLOS. 57, 1, 45--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Chen, H., Chiang, R.H.L. and Storey, V.C. 2012. Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact. MIS Quarterly. 36, 4, 1165--1188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Chenoweth, T., Corral, K. and Demirkan, H. 2006. Seven Key Interventions for Data Warehouse Success. Commun. ACM. 49, 1 (Jan. 2006), 114--119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cooper, S.M. and Owen, D.L. 2007. Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: The missing link. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 32, 649--667.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Corcoran, M. 2007. No pervasive Business Intelligence barriers breaking down walls between casual users and analytical information. Review I November 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Davenport, T.H. 2010. The New World of " Business Analytics." International Institute for Analytics. (March 2010), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawson, L. and Van Belle, J.-P. 2013. Critical success factors for business intelligence in the South African financial services sector. SA Journal of Information Management. 15, 1 (Feb. 2013), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Department of higher Education and Training 2014. Regulations for Reporting by Public Higher Education Institutions. Government Gazette No. 37726. (June 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. DeSimone, L.D. and Popoff, F. 2000. Eco-Efficiency: The Business Link to Sustainable Development. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Dhaliwal, D.S., Li, O.Z., Tsang, A. and Yang, Y.G. 2011. Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. The Accounting Review. 86, 1, 59--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Disterheft, A., Ferreira da Silva Caeiro, S.S., Ramos, M.R. and de Miranda Azeiteiro, U.M. 2012. Environmental Management Systems (EMS) implementation processes and practices in European higher education institutions -- Top-down versus participatory approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production. 31, (Aug. 2012), 80--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Dunphy, D., Griffiths, A. and Benn, S. 2003. Organizational change for corporate sustainability. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Eckerson, W. 2011. Performance dashboards Measuring, Monitoring and Managing Your Business. John Wiley & sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Elias, M., Aufaure, M. and Bezerianos, A. 2013. Storytelling in Visual Analytics tools for Business Intelligence To cite this version: Storytelling in Visual Analytics tools for Business. INTERACT 2013 - 14th IFIP TC13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Cape Town, South Africa, 280--297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Elkington, J. 2004. Enter the Triple Bottom Line. 1, 1986, 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Epstein, M. and Wisner, P. 2001. Using a balanced scorecard to implement sustainability. Environmental Quality Management. 11, 1996, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Estevez, P. 2002. University role in policy changes. Clean Production and Pollution Prevention at Universities: Inside Stories International Conference Hermosillo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Few, S. 2007. Dashboard Confusion Revisited. Visual Business Intelligence Newsletter. (March 2007), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Frehs, J. 2003. Corporate social responsibility: Lessons learned. Natural Resources.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. From Data to Information: Business Intelligence and its role in Higher Education today: 2009. http://www.universitybusiness.com/article/data-information.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Frost, G. 2012. The Collection, Integration and Reporting of Sustainability Information within an Organisation:Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Gartner 2007. Business Intelligence Platform Capability Matrix.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Ghazanfari, M., Jafari, M. and Rouhani, S. 2011. A tool to evaluate the business intelligence of enterprise systems. Scientia Iranica. 18, 6 (Dec. 2011), 1579--1590.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Gibson, M., Arnott, D. and Jagielska, I. 2004. Evaluating the Intangible Benefits of Business Intelligence: Review & Research Agenda. Decision Support in an Uncertain and Complex World: The IFIP TC8/WG8.3 International Conference, 295--305.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Goni, F.A., Sahran, S., Mukhtar, M., Shukor, S.A. and Chofreh, A.G. 2013. Aligning an information system strategy with sustainability strategy towards sustainable campus. International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems, ICRIIS, 245--250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Gunapati, S. 2011. Key Features for Designing a Dashboard. Government Finance Review (0883-7856). 27, (October 2011), 47--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Han, J., Kamber, M. and Pei, J. 2012. Data mining: concepts and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Henriques, A. and Richardson, J. 2005. The triple bottom line. Does it all add up?. Earthscan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Herremans, I. and Allwright, D. 2000. Environmental management systems at North American universities: what drives good performance? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 1, 2, 179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoffman, A.J. 2010. Carbon Strategies: How Leading Companies are Reducing Their Climate Change Footprint. University of Michigan Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Holmberg, J. and Samuelsson, B. 2006. Drivers and Barriers for Implementing Sustainable Development in Higher Education. Education for Sustainable Development in Action, Goteborg, 1--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Inmon, W. 2005. Building the Data Warehouse. John Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Institute of Directors 2009. King Code of Governance for South Africa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Jenkin, T. a., Webster, J. and McShane, L. 2011. An agenda for "Green" information technology and systems research. Information and Organization. 21, 1, 17--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Jonamu, B. 2014. A Framework for the Management of Environemntal Information in Higher Education Institutions. NMMU.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Jooste, C. 2012. Guidelines for the Usability of a BI Application within a Coal Mining Organisation. University of South Africa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Kimball, R., Ross, M., Thornthwaite, W., Mundy, J. and Becker, B. 2008. The Data Warehouse Lifecycle Toolkit. John Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Laffer, A.B., Coors, A. and Winegarden, W. 2004. Does corporate social responsibility enhance business profitability?Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Lin, Y.-H., Tsai, K.-M., Shiang, W.-J., Kuo, T.-C. and Tsai, C.-H. 2009. Research on Using ANP to Establish a Performance Assessment Model for Business Intelligence Systems. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 2 (Mar. 2009), 4135--4146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Lozano, R. 2006. A tool for a Graphical Assessment of Sustainability in Universities (GASU). Journal of Cleaner Production. 14, 9--11 (Jan. 2006), 963--972.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Lozano, R. 2011. The state of sustainability reporting in universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 12, 1, 67--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Lozano, R., Lukman, R., Lozano, F.J., Huisingh, D. and Lambrechts, W. 2013. Declarations for sustainability in higher education: becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system. Journal of Cleaner Production. 48, (Jun. 2013), 10--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. March, S.T. and Hevner, A.R. 2007. Integrated Decision Support Systems: A Data Warehousing Perspective. Decision Support Systems. 43, 3 (Apr. 2007), 1031--1043. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Melville, N.P. and Whisnant, R. 2004. Environmental Sustainability 2.0: Empirical Analysis of Environmental ERP Implementation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Microsoft 2009. Enabling Business Intelligence for Everyone.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Mihai, G. 2014. Integrating BI Tools in an Enterprise Portal for a better Enterprise Management. Database Systems Journal. V, 2, 3--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Milne, M. and Gray, R. 2008. International Trends in Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Chartered Accountants Journal, 60--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Mungree, D. and Morien, D. 2013. A Framework for Understanding the Critical Success Factors of Enterprise Business Intelligence Implementation. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Chicago, Illinois, 2013, 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Munguıa, N. 2002. Promoting P2 practices in the maquiladora industry. Clean Production and Pollution Prevention at Universities: Inside Stories International Conference, Hermosillo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Muntean, M., Sabau, G., Bologa, A., Surcel, T. and Florea, A. 2013. Performance Dashboards for Universities. 2nd International Conference on Manufacturing Engineering, Quality and Production Systems, 206--211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Nicolaides, A. 2006. The implementation of environmental management towards sustainable universities and education for sustainable development as an ethical imperative. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 7, 414--424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Olszak, C.M. and Ziemba, E. 2012. Critical Success Factors for Implementing Business Intelligence Systems in Small and Medium Enterprises on the Example of Upper Silesia, Poland. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management. 7, 129--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Ong, I., Siew, P. and Wong, S. 2011. A Five-Layered Business Intelligence Architecture. Communications of the IBIMA. 2011, (Mar. 2011), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Orr, D. 2000. Transformation of academic planning for environmental education in the 21st century. Sustainability and University Life. W. Leal Filho, ed. Peter Lang. 221.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Oskarsson, K. and von Malmborg, F. 2005. Integrated Management Systems as a Corporate Response to Sustainable Development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 12, 121--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Otto, B. and Reichert, A. 2010. Organizing Master Data Management: Findings from an Expert Survey. Proceedings of The 25th ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Sierre, 106--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Paraschivescu, V. and Radu, C.E. 2011. Higher education, a resource for sustainability. Economy Transdisciplinarity Cognition. XIV, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Pearlson, K.E. and Saunders, C.S. 2010. Managing and Using Information Systems: A Strategic Approach. John Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Philpott, S. 2010. Advanced Analytics: Unlocking the Power of Insight.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Quazi, H.A. 2001. Sustainable development: integrating environmental issues into strategic planning. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 101, 2, 64--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Ranjan, J. 2008. Business justification with business intelligence. Vine. 38, 4 (Oct. 2008), 461--475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Sabherwal, R. and Becerra-Fernandez, I. 2011. Business Intelligence Practices, Technologies and Management. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Sahay, B.S. and Ranjan, J. 2008. Real time business intelligence in supply chain analytics. Information Management & Computer Security. 16, 1 (Mar. 2008), 28--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Sammalisto, K. and Lindhqvist, T. 2005. Integration of Sustainability in Higher Education: A Study with International Perspectives. 32, 4, 127--139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M. 2006. Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation. 3, 1, 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Scholtz, B., Connolley, A. and Calitz, A.P. 2014. Information Technology in Environmental Engineering. Information Technology in Environmental Engineering. B. Funk, P. Niemeyer, and J.M. Gómez, eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 141--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Sharman, D. 2010. An Introduction to Business Intelligence for Higher Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Shriberg, M. 2011. Institutional Assessment Tools for Sustainability in Higher Education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 3, 3, 254--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Stephens, J.C. and Graham, A.C. 2010. Toward an empirical research agenda for sustainability in higher education: exploring the transition management framework. Journal of Cleaner Production. 18, 611--618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Stocker, R. 2010. The Role of Business Intelligence Dashboards in Higher Education. Credit Control. 37--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Topic Overview: Business Intelligence: 2008. http://www.forrester.com/Topic+Overview+Business+Intelligence/-/E-RES39218?objectid=RES39218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Velazquez, L., Munguia, N. and Sanchez, M. 2005. Deterring sustainability in higher education institutions: An appraisal of the factors which influence sustainability in higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 6, 4, 383--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Vesset, D. and Mcdonough, B. 2009. Improving Organizational Performance Management Through Pervasive Business Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Vural, E. 2006. Business intelligence for a supply chain management system. Issues in Information Systems. VII, 2, 29--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Watson, H.J. 2009. Tutorial: Business Intelligence -- Past, Present, and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 25, November, 487--510.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Watson, H.J. and Wixom, B.H. 2007. The current state of business intelligence. Computer. 40, 96--99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Wieder, B., Ossimitz, M. and Chamoni, P. 2014. The Impact of Business Intelligence Tools on Performance: A User Satisfaction Paradox. International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research. 5, 3, 7--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Windolph, S.E., Schaltegger, S. and Herzig, C. 2014. Implementing corporate sustainability. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 5, 4 (Oct. 2014), 378--404.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Wixom, B.H. and Watson, H.J. 2001. Investigation of the Factors an Empirical. MIS Quarterly. 25, 1, 17--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Wright, T.S.A. 2006. Giving "teeth" to an environmental policy: a Delphi Study at Dalhousie University. Journal of Cleaner Production. 14, 761--768.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Yeoh, W. and Koronios, A. 2010. Business Intelligence Systems University of South Australia. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 50, 3, 23--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using Business Intelligence to Support Strategic Sustainability Information Management

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SAICSIT '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Research Conference on South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists
          September 2015
          423 pages

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 28 September 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          SAICSIT '15 Paper Acceptance Rate43of119submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate187of439submissions,43%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader