skip to main content
10.1145/2816839.2816868acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiciipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Bacterial foraging optimization with double role of reproduction and step adaptation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 November 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Bacterial foraging optimization (BFO) is a swarm intelligence algorithm inspired by the foraging behavior of Escherichia coli (E.coli). BFO has demonstrated a great performance for many real world problems. But it has two noteworthy disadvantages: its large number of parameters and its fixed step-size unit. In this work, we present a new effective version of BFO algorithm. At first the Elimination-Dispersal step and some parameters are discarded. The benefits of the Elimination-Dispersal step are rewarded on the new proposed reproduction and step-adaptation mechanisms. These two mechanisms are very simple and effective with little computational cost. Unlike original BFO reproduction, the proposed reproduction mechanism allows new born bacteria to take different positions from their clones. The resulting bacteria distribution keeps a good Elitism / Diversity trade-off. In the same context, the proposed step-adaptation mechanism use small and big step-sizes which serves exploitation as well as exploration. Performances of the proposed algorithm are compared to many other results obtained from the literature. Results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms significantly almost compared algorithms on many test functions.

References

  1. A. Biswas, S. Das, A. Abraham, and S. Dasgupta. Stability analysis of the reproduction operator in bacterial foraging optimization. Theoretical Computer Science, 411(21):2127--2139, 2010. Swarm Intelligence Theory: A Snapshot of the State of the Art. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Brownlee. Clever Algorithms: Nature-inspired Programming Recipes. LULU Press, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Dasgupta, S. Das, A. Abraham, and A. Biswas. Adaptive computational chemotaxis in bacterial foraging optimization: An analysis. Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on, 13(4):919--941, Aug 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. Li, Y. Zhang, J. Wu, and H. Li. Quantum bacterial foraging optimization algorithm. pages 1265--1272, July 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Li, J. Dang, F. Bu, and J. Wang. Analysis and improvement of the bacterial foraging optimization algorithm. JCSE, pages 1--10, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. E. Mezura-Montes and B. Hernández-Ocaña. Modified bacterial foraging optimization for engineering design. In Intelligent engineering systems through artificial neural networks. ASME Press, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. Mishra. A hybrid least square-fuzzy bacterial foraging strategy for harmonic estimation. Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on, 9(1):61--73, Feb 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Munoz, S. Halgamuge, W. Alfonso, and E. Caicedo. Simplifying the bacteria foraging optimization algorithm. In Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2010 IEEE Congress on, pages 1--7, July 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. G. N. Nasir, A. N. K.; Tokhi. Novel adaptive bacterial foraging algorithms for global optimisation with application to modelling of a trs. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 02 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. K. Passino. Biomimicry of bacterial foraging for distributed optimization and control. Control Systems, IEEE, 22(3):52--67, Jun 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. H. Shen and Y. Zhu. Adaptive bacterial foraging optimization algorithm based on social foraging strategy. Journal of Networks, 9(3), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. H. Supriyono and M. Tokhi. Adaptation schemes of chemotactic step size of bacterial foraging algorithm for faster convergence. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 4(4):207--219, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Y. Xiaohui, Z. Yunlong, Z. Hao, H. Chen, and N. Ben. An adaptive bacterial foraging optimization algorithm with lifecycle and social learning, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. H.-l. Xu, Xin; Chen. Adaptive computational chemotaxis based on field in bacterial foraging optimization. Soft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications, 18, 04 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. X. Xu, Y.-h. Liu, A.-m. Wang, G. Wang, X. Sun, and H.-l. Chen. A new adaptive bacterial swarm algorithm. In Natural Computation (ICNC), 2012 Eighth International Conference on, pages 991--995. IEEE, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Bacterial foraging optimization with double role of reproduction and step adaptation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IPAC '15: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing, Security and Advanced Communication
      November 2015
      495 pages
      ISBN:9781450334587
      DOI:10.1145/2816839

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 November 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate87of367submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader