skip to main content
10.1145/2818048.2820000acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mom, I Do Have a Family!: Attitudes, Agreements, and Expectations on the Interaction with Chilean Older Adults

Published:27 February 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Most related research about intra-family communication follows the reality of developed countries, where older adults can live independently from their families and are likely to embrace technology. Contrarily, in Chile and other Latin American countries, most older adults live close to their families, are usually dependent of the latter, and rarely use digital means to communicate. Through cross-generational interviews, we identified attitudes, agreements, and expectations that describe how middle class Chilean families, living in urban settlements, interact with their elders. The study findings indicate that the approach used by the adult children to take care of their parents produces a vicious circle that stresses out the former and limits the technology adoption of the latter. Therefore, new ways of interacting with the elderly are required and digital technology has the potential to produce this change.

References

  1. Regina Akel. 2004. Chile. In Teen Life in Latin America and the Caribbean (Teen Life Around the World), Cynthia Tompkins and Kristen Sternberg (eds.). Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, USA, 57-76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Carmen Barros, M. Beatriz Fernández, and María Soledad Herrera. 2014. Notions that people over 45 years old have about family and the internal interactions between family members {in Spanish}. Psicoperspectivas, 13, 1, 121-130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mark Blythe, Jamie Steane, Jenny Roe, and Caroline Oliver. 2015. Solutionism, the game: design fictions for positive aging. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'15), 3849-3858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702491 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. danah boyd. 2014. It's complicated: the social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press, New Haven, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Margot Brereton, Alessandro Soro, Kate Vaisutis, and Paul Roe. 2015. The messaging kettle: prototyping connection over a distance between adult children and older parents. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'15), 713-716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702462 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Rafael A. Calvo and Dorian Peters. 2014. Positive Computing: Technology for Wellbeing and Human Potential. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Raymundo Cornejo, Mónica Tentori, and Jesús Favela. 2013. Ambient awareness to strengthen the family social network of older adults. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 22, 2-3 (April 2013), 309-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-012-9166-2 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Anna Dickinson and Robin L. Hill. 2007. Keeping in touch: talking to older people about computers and communication. Educational Gerontology 33, 8, 613630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03601270701363877Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Melanie M. Domenech Rodríguez, Melissa R. Donovic, and Susan L. Crowley. 2009. Parenting styles in a cultural context: observations of 'protective parenting' in first-generation Latinos. Family Process 48, 2, 195-210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Celia Jaes Falicov. 2013. Latino Families in Therapy (2nd. ed.). Guilford Press, New York, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Azadeh Forghani and Carman Neustaedter. The routines and needs of grandparents and parents for grandparent-grandchild conversations over distance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'14), 4177-4186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557255 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. María Soledad Herrera. 2007. Social Individualization and Demographic Changes: Toward a Second Demographic Transition? {Individualización Social y Cambios Demográficos: ¿Hacia Una Segunda Transición Demográfica?, in Spanish}. CIS, Madrid, Spain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Internet World Stats. 2014. Latin American Internet and Population Statistics. Retrieved May 1, 2015 from http://internetworldstats.com/stats10.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Tracy L. M. Kennedy and Barry Wellman. 2007. The networked household. Information, Communication & Society 10, 5, 645-670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691180701658012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Uichol Kim. 1994. Individualism and collectivism: conceptual clarification and elaboration. In Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, Uichol Kim, Harry C. Triandis, Cigdem Kagitcibasi, Sang-Chin Choi, and Gene Yoon (eds.). Sage Publications, Thousands Oaks, CA, USA, 1-18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Siân E. Lindley, Richard Harper, and Abigail Sellen. 2008. Designing for elders: exploring the complexity of relationships in later life. In Proceedings of the BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI'08), 77-86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hazel Rose Markus and Shinobu Kitayama. 1991. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review. 98, 2, 224-253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jane McGonigal. 2011. Reality is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. The Penguin Press, New York, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Ministry of Social Development, Chile. 2012. Seventh National Study on Youth {Séptima Encuesta Nacional de Juventud, in Spanish}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ministry of Social Development, Chile. 2013. Chile and its Older Adults: Third National Study on Life of Quality in the Old Age {Chile y sus Mayores: Resultados de la Tercera Encuesta Nacional de Calidad de Vida en la Vejez, in Spanish}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ministry of Social Development, Chile. 2013. Social Inclusion and Exclusion of the Elderly in Chile {Inclusión y Exclusión de las Personas Mayores en Chile, in Spanish}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP. 2015. Caregiving in the U.S. – 2015 Report. Retrieved July 19, 2015 from http://www.aarp.org/ppi/info2015/caregiving-in-the-united-states-2015.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. National Statistics Institute, Chile. 2012. Preliminary Results of the 2012 Census of Population and Housing {in Spanish}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tobias Nef, Raluca L. Ganea, René M. Müri, and Urs P. Mosimann. 2013. Social networking sites and older users - a systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics. 25, 7, 1041-1053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1041610213000355Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. OECD. 2015. Average annual hours actually worked per worker. Retrieved May 5, 2015 from http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=ANHRSGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Andra Siibak and Virge Tamme. 2013. 'Who introduced Granny to Facebook?': an exploration of everyday family interactions in web-based communication environments. Northern Lights: Film & Media Studies Yearbook 11, 1 (June 2013), 71-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/nl.11.1.71_1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Hilary Smith, Yvonne Rogers, and Mark Brady. 2003. Managing one's social network: does age make a difference? In Proceedings of the IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT'03), 551-558.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Maria C. Stuifbergen, Johannes J. M. Van Delden, and Pearl A. Dykstra. 2008. The implications of today's family structures for support giving to older parents. Ageing & Society 28, 3 (April 2008), 413-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X07006666Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Maria C. Stuifbergen, Pearl A. Dykstra, Katja N. Lanting, and Johannes J. M. Van Delden. 2010. Autonomy in an ascribed relationship: the case of adult children and elderly parents. Journal of Aging Studies, 24, 4 (December 2010), 257-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2010.05.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Juana Suárez. 2004. Colombia. In Teen Life in Latin America and the Caribbean (Teen Life Around the World), Cynthia Tompkins and Kristen Sternberg (eds.). Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, USA, 77-98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Kimberly Tee, A. J. Bernheim Brush, and Kori M. Inkpen. 2009. Exploring communication and sharing between extended families. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67, 128-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.09.007 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Jenny Waycott, Frank Vetere, Sonja Pedell, Lars Kulik, Elizabeth Ozanne, Alan Gruner, and John Downs. 2013. Older adults as digital content producers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'13), 39-48. http://dx/doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470662 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Mom, I Do Have a Family!: Attitudes, Agreements, and Expectations on the Interaction with Chilean Older Adults

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CSCW '16: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
        February 2016
        1866 pages
        ISBN:9781450335928
        DOI:10.1145/2818048

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 27 February 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CSCW '16 Paper Acceptance Rate142of571submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

        CSCW '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader