skip to main content
10.1145/2818052.2869090acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

The role of outsiders in consensus formation: A case study of Yelp

Published:27 February 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Review sites play a key role in determining the reputation and popularity of various businesses. Consumers are influenced by the reviews on these sites to take their decision before adoption of a service, rendering significant potential to reviewers on these sites to hurt or boost the practise of business units. It is usually believed that the local reviewers have a better understanding of the business hosts in their regions and their reviews are much more influential. How-ever by analyzing the reviews on a popular review site Yelp, we show that the reviews provided by the non-local review-ers (“outsiders”) converge over time while local reviewers are much more decentralised and provide mixed choices to the consumers. In order to identify the possible reasons for this, we unfold a series of systematic differences in the reviewing characteristics of the outsiders that make them strikingly different from the insiders.

References

  1. Gee, G., Lengerich, C., and ONeill, E. Identifying Cascades in Yelp Reviews. Tech. rep., Stanford University, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Hegselmann, R., and Krause, U. Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. JASSS 5, 3 (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kooti, F., Yang, H., Cha, M., Gummadi, P. K., and Mason, W. A. The emergence of conventions in online social networks. In ICWSM (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Luca, M., and Zervas, G. Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and yelp review fraud. Harvard Business School NOM UnitWorking Paper, 14-006 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. McAuley, J., and Leskovec, J. Hidden factors and hidden topics: Understanding rating dimensions with review text. In RecSys (2013), 165-172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mukherjee, A., Liu, B., and Glance, N. Spotting fake reviewer groups in consumer reviews. In WWW, ACM (2012), 191-200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Rahman, M., Carbunar, B., Ballesteros, J., and Chau, D. H. P. To catch a fake: Curbing deceptive yelp ratings and venues. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal 8, 3 (2015), 147-161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '16 Companion: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion
    February 2016
    549 pages
    ISBN:9781450339506
    DOI:10.1145/2818052

    Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 February 2016

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • abstract

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '24
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader