research-article

Students' Attitudes and Motivation During Robotics Activities

Authors:

Fatima Kaloti-Hallak,

Mordechai (Moti) Ben-AriAuthors Info & Claims

WiPSCE '15: Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education

Pages 102 - 110

https://doi.org/10.1145/2818314.2818317

Published: 09 November 2015 Publication History

Abstract

This work investigates students' attitudes towards and motivation for learning robotics and STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics). The population consisted of middle-school students (ages 13-15 years) who participated in the FIRST® LEGO® League competition. The methodology used both qualitative and quantitative instruments: questionnaires, observations and interviews during the school year 2012--2013. Research continued with one group during 2013--2014. Four categories were investigated: intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, self-determination and self-efficacy, as well as other environmental factors (gender, peers, parents and teachers). The results showed no significant difference between the beginning and end of the activities on all the categories. We consider this as a positive indicator, since most of the students demonstrated high and positive attitudes toward and motivation for learning robotics at the beginning of the activities and maintained the results after the activities. The environmental factors played an important role in positively influencing students' attitudes and motivation. In particular, females showed more positive attitudes and motivation at the end of the activities.

References

[1]

Anderson, M., McKenzie, A., Wellman, B., Brown, M., & Vrbsky, S. 2011. Affecting Attitudes in First-year Computer Science using Syntax-free Robotics Programming. ACM Indroads, 2(3), 51--57.

Digital Library

[2]

Apiola, M., Lattu, M. & Pasanen, T. 2010. Creativity and Intrinsic Motivation in Computer Science Education: Experimenting with Robots. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE'10). 199--203.

Digital Library

[3]

Avsec, S., Rihtarsic, D. & Kocijancic, S. 2014. A Predictive Study of Learner Attitudes Toward Open Learning in Roboitcs Class. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 23. Springer, New York 692--704.

[4]

Bandura, A. 1982. Self-efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist 37, 122--147

[5]

Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman, New York.

[6]

Chi, M. 1997. Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271--315.

[7]

Fortus, D. 2014. Attending to Affect. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 821--835.

[8]

Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. 2011. Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation with Science Majors and Nonscience Majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1--18.

[9]

Lauwers, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Hamner, I. 2009. CSbots: Design and Deployment of a Robot Designed for the CS1 Classroom. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1), 428--432.

Digital Library

[10]

McGill, M. M. 2012. Learning to Program with Personal Robots: Influences on Student Motivation. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 12(1). 1--32

Digital Library

[11]

McWhorter, W., & O'Connor, B., 2009. Do LEGO Mindstorms motivate students in CS1?. ACM SIGCSE'09 Bulletin 41(1). 438--442.

Digital Library

[12]

Melchior, A., Cohen, F., Cutter, T., & Leavitt, T. 2005. More than Robots: An Evaluation of the FIRST Robotics Competition Participant and Institutional Impacts: Center for Youth and Communities, Brandeis University.

[13]

Miller, D. P., & Stein, C. 2000. (So That's Pi is For!) and Other Educational Epiphanies from Hands-on Robotics: Morgan Kaufmann.

[14]

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. 2003. Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049--1079.

[15]

Pintrich, R. R., & DeGroot, E. V. 1990. Motivational and Self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33--40.

[16]

Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68--78.

[17]

Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. 2011. Adolescents' declining motivation to learn science: Inevitable or not? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 199--216.

[18]

Verner, I. M., & Ahlgren, D. J. 2004. Robot Contest as a Laboratory for Experiential Engineering Education. ACM Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 4(2), 1--15.

Digital Library

Cited By

Román-Graván PArrifano-Tadeu P(2025)robótica en la formación docente universitariaIJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation10.46661/ijeri.11021Online publication date: 26-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.11021
Beheshti MShah SZhang HBarnett MHira A(2024)Affordances of Technology for Sustainability-Oriented K–12 Informal Engineering EducationSustainability10.3390/su1616671916:16(6719)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166719
Selcuk NKucuk SSisman B(2024)Does really educational robotics improve secondary school students’ course motivation, achievement and attitude?Education and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-12773-129:17(23753-23780)Online publication date: 31-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12773-1
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Students' Attitudes and Motivation During Robotics Activities

Recommendations

The effect of robotics activities on students' learning and attitudes
ICER '14: Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on International computing education research

My research investigates students' learning of and attitudes toward STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) in general and Computer Science (CS) in particular during their participation in robotics activities. The research population ...
Attitudes of individuals with visual impairments towards distance education

The aims of this work were to examine the attitudes of individuals with visual impairments towards distance education (DE) and the relationships between attitudes and participants' personal characteristics. Forty-one adults with visual impairments, who ...
A study of college students' attitudes toward computers

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

WiPSCE '15: Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education

November 2015

149 pages

ISBN:9781450337533

DOI:10.1145/2818314

Conference Chairs:
Judith Gal-Ezer
The Open University of Israel
,
Sue Sentance
King's College London & Computing At School
,
Jan Vahrenhold
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster

Copyright © 2015 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

King's College London: King's College London
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 November 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

WiPSCE '15

WiPSCE '15: Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education

November 9 - 11, 2015

London, United Kingdom

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 104 of 279 submissions, 37%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

40
Total Citations
View Citations
588
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)43
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Román-Graván PArrifano-Tadeu P(2025)robótica en la formación docente universitariaIJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation10.46661/ijeri.11021Online publication date: 26-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.11021
Beheshti MShah SZhang HBarnett MHira A(2024)Affordances of Technology for Sustainability-Oriented K–12 Informal Engineering EducationSustainability10.3390/su1616671916:16(6719)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166719
Selcuk NKucuk SSisman B(2024)Does really educational robotics improve secondary school students’ course motivation, achievement and attitude?Education and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-12773-129:17(23753-23780)Online publication date: 31-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12773-1
Bano SAtif KMehdi S(2024)Systematic review: Potential effectiveness of educational robotics for 21st century skills development in young learnersEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12233-229:9(11135-11153)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10639-023-12233-2
Tsagaris AChatzikyrkou M(2023)Usability Evaluation of Educational RoboticsProceedings of the 7th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology10.1145/3625704.3625719(62-68)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3625704.3625719
Berg PKnobelsdorf M(2023)Elaborating Student Engagement in Compulsory K-12 Computer Science ClassProceedings of the 18th WiPSCE Conference on Primary and Secondary Computing Education Research10.1145/3605468.3609762(1-4)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3605468.3609762
Chiang FTang ZZhu DBao X(2023)Gender disparity in STEM education: a survey research on girl participants in World Robot OlympiadInternational Journal of Technology and Design Education10.1007/s10798-023-09830-034:2(629-646)Online publication date: 6-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09830-0
Garvis SKeane T(2023)A Literature Review of Educational Robotics and Early Childhood EducationTechnological Innovations in Education10.1007/978-981-99-2785-2_6(71-83)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2785-2_6
Mishra DLugo RParish KTilden S(2023)Metacognitive Processes Involved in Human Robot Interaction in the School Learning EnvironmentHuman-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-35599-8_6(85-100)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35599-8_6
Chesterman M(2023)Game Making and Coding Fluency in a Primary Computing ContextTeaching Coding in K-12 Schools10.1007/978-3-031-21970-2_12(171-187)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21970-2_12
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten