ABSTRACT
Transportation networks and associated analytic algorithms have been extensively studied in the research domain, with numerous systems in widespread production. An equally important domain that has not been well addressed by the research community are network models used to support the utility domain (e.g., water, wastewater, stormwater, gas, electric, pipeline, and telecommunications). The utility domain places a very different set of requirements on a network model and the associated analytic operations than are found with transportation networks. Existing models (e.g., transportation or social graph focused) suffer from a number of limitations and constraints that limit the ability of utility companies from most effectively modeling their network connected infrastructure. Although many utilities have succeeded in implementing systems on top of simple graph models, the solutions have often involved either having to author considerable amounts of custom application code to go with the model (a very expensive and cumbersome proposition), or modifying the workflows in order to compensate for the graph model limitations. This paper proposes the creation of a new utility-centric graph information model to directly support the modeling of utility infrastructures. It is focused on supporting additional requirements for improved performance and scalability (through optimized data models), efficiency and productivity (using a model that supports underground, inside-plant, etc.), data quality (rule-based system which prevents bad data from being created), real-time data acquisition (support for field-based telemetry), enhanced visualization capabilities (schematic visualizations of data), and integration across a services-centric platform model (e.g., RESTful services, desktop, mobile, and web-based clients).
- Amin, S., and Wollenberg, B. 2005. Toward a smart grid: Power delivery for the 21st century. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 3, 5. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MPAE.2005.1507024.Google Scholar
- Bakalov, P., Hoel, E., Menon, S., and Tsotras, V. 2009. Versioning of network models in a multiuser environment. In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Spatial and Temporal Databases (SSTD 2009), Aalborg, Denmark, July 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Batty, P. 1990. Exploiting Relational Database Technology in GIS. Mapping Awareness, 4, 6 (July 1990).Google Scholar
- Childs, C. 2011. ArcGIS Network Analyst: Networks and Network Models. Esri Press, Redlands, CA.Google Scholar
- Evans, J., and Minieka, E. 1992. Optimization Algorithms for Networks and Graphs. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY.Google Scholar
- GE Digital Energy. 2015. Smallworld Core. http://www.gedigitalenergy.com/Geospatial/catalog/smallworld_core.htm.Google Scholar
- International Electrotechnical Commission. 2013. Energy management system application program interface -- Part 301: Common information model base. IEC 61970-301.Google Scholar
- Longley, P., Goodchild, M., Maguire, D., and Rhind, D. 1999. Geographical Information Systems, Principles, Techniques, Applications, and Management. Wiley Publishing Company, West Sussex, England.Google Scholar
- Mainguenaud, M. 1995. Modelling of the geographical information system network component. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9, 6, 575--593.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Meehan, B. 2013. Modeling Electric Distribution with GIS, Esri Press, Redlands, CA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morehouse, S. 1985. ARC/INFO: a geo-relational model for spatial information. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Computer-Assisted Cartography (AUTOCARTO 7), Washington, DC, March 1985.Google Scholar
- National Communications System. 2004. Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Systems. Technical bulletin 04-1, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
- Oracle. 2003. Oracle Database 10g Network Data Model. Prepared by Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores, CA.Google Scholar
- Snodgrass, R. 1999. Developing Time-Oriented Database Applications in SQL. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- U. S. Dept. of Energy. 2008. Advanced Metering Infrastructure, V 1.0. NETL, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Yu, F. R., Zhang, P., Xiao, W., and Choudhury, P. 2011. Communication Systems for Grid Integration of Renewable Energy Resources, IEEE Network, 25, 5 (September 2011). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zeiler, M. 1999. Modeling Our World: The Esri Guide to Geodatabase Design. Esri Press, Redlands, CA.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Moving beyond transportation: utility network management
Recommendations
A Network Model for the Utility Domain
SIGSPATIAL '17: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information SystemsThe existing network models in geographic information systems that are used to support the utility domain (e.g., water, wastewater, sewer, gas, electric, and telecommunications) have limitations and constraints that restrict the ability of these utility ...
A trace framework for analyzing utility networks: a summary of results (industrial paper)
SIGSPATIAL '18: Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information SystemsGiven a utility network and one or more starting points that define where analysis should begin, the problem of analyzing utility networks entails assembling a subset of network elements that meet some specified criteria. Analyzing utility network data ...
Resilience Evaluation Approach of Transportation Networks
CSO '09: Proceedings of the 2009 International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences and Optimization - Volume 02To analyze the resilience of transportation networks, it is proposed to use a quantificational resilience evaluation approach. First, we represent transportation networks by an undirected graph with the nodes as cities and edges as traffic roads. ...
Comments