skip to main content
10.1145/2835596.2835616acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A personalized GeoSocial app for surviving an earthquake

Published:03 November 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Earthquakes are sudden, cause huge damage to extensive areas, and may negatively affect the lives of millions of people. Thus, it is crucial to develop a system that can help people survive an earthquake and recover from its aftereffects. In this paper we present a vision of a smartphone app, called EAGA (earthquake alerter and guidance app), that will guide both victims and rescue workers, by leveraging probabilistic geosocial information collected before the event, during the earthquake and in its aftermath. The app has four modes of operation. In standby mode, EAGA collects data about users, their regularly visited locations and their social relations. In alert mode, EAGA warns of an impending earthquake, based on data collected from a variety of sensors and from government warning systems. It also provides initial guidance to the user during the onset of the quake. In disaster mode, EAGA assists users to cope with the tasks of the immediate aftermath, such as evacuation and rescue of victims buried underneath rubble of collapsed buildings. Finally, in recovery mode, EAGA facilitates family reunification, provides information about aid centers and sends warnings regarding the spread of diseases. We believe that EAGA can revolutionize disaster management, and complements current earthquake readiness efforts, by allowing a large degree of much needed decentralization and personalization in dealing with earthquakes.

References

  1. J. Abrahams. Disaster management in australia: The national emergency management system. Emergency Medicine, 13(2):165--173, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. J. E. Aranda, A. Jimenez, G. Ibarrola, F. Alcantar, A. Aguilar, M. Inostroza, and S. Maldonado. Mexico city seismic alert system. Seismological Research Letters, 66(6):42--53, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. L. I. Besaleva and A. C. Weaver. Applications of social networks and crowdsourcing for disaster management improvement. In Proc. of the 2013 International Conf. on Social Computing, SOCIALCOM '13, pages 213--219. IEEE Computer Society, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Careem, C. De Silva, R. De Silva, L. Raschid, and S. Weerawarana. Sahana: Overview of a disaster management system. In Information and Automation, 2006. ICIA 2006. International Conference on, pages 361--366. IEEE, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. Careem, C. De Silva, R. De Silva, L. Raschid, and S. Weerawarana. Demonstration of sahana: free and open source disaster management. In Proc. of the 8th annual international Conf. on Digital government research: bridging disciplines & domains, pages 266--267. Digital Government Society of North America, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. Chittaro and D. Nadalutti. Presenting evacuation instructions on mobile devices by means of location-aware 3d virtual environments. In Proc. of the 10th International Conf. on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pages 395--398. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. K. Cho, C. Pelsser, R. Bush, and Y. Won. The japan earthquake: the impact on traffic and routing observed by a local isp. In Proc. of the Special Workshop on Internet and Disasters, SWID '11, pages 2:1--2:8. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Cohen and N. Cohen-Tzemach. Implementing link-prediction for social networks in a database system. In Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD Workshop on Databases and Social Networks, pages 37--42, New York, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Cohen and A. Zohar. An axiomatic approach to link prediction. In Proc. of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, January 25--30, 2015, Austin, Texas, USA., pages 58--64, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Crooks, A. Croitoru, A. Stefanidis, and J. Radzikowski. # earthquake: Twitter as a distributed sensor system. Transactions in GIS, 17(1):124--147, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. P. Currion, C. d. Silva, and B. Van de Walle. Open source software for disaster management. Commun. ACM, 50(3):61--65, Mar. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Y. Doytsher, B. Galon, and Y. Kanza. Querying geo-social data by bridging spatial networks and social networks. In Proc. of the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Location Based Social Networks, LBSN '10, pages 39--46. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Y. Doytsher, B. Galon, and Y. Kanza. Storing routes in socio-spatial networks and supporting social-based route recommendation. In Proc. of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Location-Based Social Networks, pages 49--56, Chicago, Illinois, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. Earle. Earthquake twitter. Nature Geoscience, 3(4):221--222, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. D. Flatow, M. Naaman, K. E. Xie, Y. Volkovich, and Y. Kanza. On the accuracy of hyper-local geotagging of social media content. In Proc. of the Eighth ACM International Conf. on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM '15, pages 127--136, Shanghai, China, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Fraser, G. Leonard, I. Matsuo, and H. Murakami. Tsunami evacuation: lessons from the Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami of March 11th 2011. GNS Science, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. L. Frommberger and F. Schmid. Mobile4d: Crowdsourced disaster alerting and reporting. In Proc. of the Sixth International Conf. on Information and Communications Technologies and Development: Notes - Volume 2, ICTD '13, pages 29--32, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. K. Fukuda, M. Aoki, S. Abe, Y. Ji, M. Koibuchi, M. Nakamura, S. Yamada, and S. Urushidani. Impact of tohoku earthquake on r&e network in japan. In Proc. of the Special Workshop on Internet and Disasters, SWID '11, pages 1:1--1:6. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. H. Gao, G. Barbier, and R. Goolsby. Harnessing the crowdsourcing power of social media for disaster relief. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 23(3):10--14, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. H. Gibson, S. Andrews, K. Domdouzis, L. Hirsch, and B. Akhgar. Combining big social media data and fca for crisis response. In Proc. of the 2014 IEEE/ACM 7th International Conf. on Utility and Cloud Computing, UCC '14, pages 690--695. IEEE Computer Society, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. R. Gotsman and Y. Kanza. Compact representation of GPS trajectories over vectorial road networks. In Proc. of the 13th International Conf. on Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases, pages 241--258, Munich, Germany, 2013. Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. R. Gotsman and Y. Kanza. A dilution-matching-encoding compaction of trajectories over road networks. GeoInformatica, 19(2):331--364, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. I. Grabovitch-Zuyev, Y. Kanza, E. Kravi, and B. Pat. On the correlation between textual content and geospatial locations in microblogs. In Proc. of Workshop on Managing and Mining Enriched Geo-Spatial Data, GeoRich'14, pages 3:1--3:6, Snowbird, UT, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. I. Hefez, Y. Kanza, and R. Levin. Tarsius: A system for traffic-aware route search under conditions of uncertainty. In Proc. of the 19th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conf. on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Chicago, Illinois, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. S. Horiuchi, H. Negishi, K. Abe, A. Kamimura, and Y. Fujinawa. An automatic processing system for broadcasting earthquake alarms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95(2):708--718, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. P. T. Jaeger, B. Shneiderman, K. R. Fleischmann, J. Preece, Y. Qu, and P. Fei Wu. Community response grids: E-government, social networks, and effective emergency management. Telecommun. Policy, 31(10--11):592--604, Nov. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. H.-C. Jang, Y.-N. Lien, and T.-C. Tsai. Rescue information system for earthquake disasters based on manet emergency communication platform. In Proc. of the 2009 International Conf. on Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing: Connecting the World Wirelessly, pages 623--627. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Y. Kanza, E. Safra, and Y. Sagiv. Route search over probabilistic geospatial data. In Proc. of the 11th International Symposium on Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases, SSTD '09, pages 153--170, Aalborg, Denmark, 2009. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Y. Kanza and H. Samet. An online marketplace for geosocial data. In Proc. of the 23rd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conf. on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (SIGSPATIAL), Seattle, Washington, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. S. Karmakar, A. S. Rathore, S. M. Kadri, S. Dutt, S. Khare, and S. Lal. Post-earthquake outbreak of rotavirus gastroenteritis in kashmir (india): An epidemiological analysis. Public Health, 122(10):981--989, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. R. Levin and Y. Kanza. Stratified-sampling over social networks using mapreduce. In Proc. of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD International Conf. on Management of Data, pages 863--874, Snowbird, Utah, USA, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. R. Levin and Y. Kanza. Tars: Traffic-aware route search. Geoinformatica, 18(3):461--500, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. J. Li, Q. Li, C. Liu, S. Ullah Khan, and N. Ghani. Community-based collaborative information system for emergency management. Comput. Oper. Res., 42:116--124, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. A. Mansourian, A. Rajabifard, M. V. Zoej, and I. Williamson. Using sdi and web-based system to facilitate disaster management. Computers & Geosciences, 32(3):303--315, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. T. M. McLaren, J. D. Myers, J. S. Lee, N. L. Tolbert, S. D. Hampton, and C. M. Navarro. Maeviz: An earthquake risk assessment system. In Proc. of the 16th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conf. on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Irvine, California, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. D. Mendonça, T. Jefferson, and J. Harrald. Collaborative adhocracies and mix-and-match technologies in emergency management. Commun. ACM, 50(3):44--49, Mar. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. M. Miyabe, A. Miura, and E. Aramaki. Use trend analysis of twitter after the great east japan earthquake. In Proc. of the ACM 2012 Conf. on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '12, pages 175--178. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. M. Olson, A. Liu, M. Faulkner, and K. M. Chandy. Rapid detection of rare geospatial events: Earthquake warning applications. In Proc. of the 5th ACM International Conf. on Distributed Event-based System, DEBS '11, pages 89--100, New York, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. B. Pat, Y. Kanza, and M. Naaman. Geosocial search: Finding places based on geotagged social-media posts. In Proc. of the 24th International Conf. on World Wide Web, Florence, Italy, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. G. Pearson, M. Gill, S. Antani, L. Neve, G. Miernicki, K. Phichaphop, A. Kanduru, S. Jaeger, and G. Thoma. The role of location for family reunification during disasters. In Proc. of the First ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Use of GIS in Public Health, HealthGIS '12, pages 11--18. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. D. Pohl, A. Bouchachia, and H. Hellwagner. Automatic sub-event detection in emergency management using social media. In Proc. of the 21st International Conf. on World Wide Web, pages 683--686. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Y. Qu, C. Huang, P. Zhang, and J. Zhang. Microblogging after a major disaster in china: a case study of the 2010 yushu earthquake. In Proc. of the ACM 2011 Conf. on Computer supported cooperative work, CSCW '11, pages 25--34. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. E. Safra, Y. Kanza, N. Dolev, Y. Sagiv, and Y. Doytsher. Computing a k-route over uncertain geographical data. In Proc. of the 10th International Conf. on Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases, SSTD'07, pages 276--293, Boston, MA, USA, 2007. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. T. Sakaki, M. Okazaki, and Y. Matsuo. Earthquake shakes twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In Proc. of the 19th international Conf. on World Wide Web, pages 851--860. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. A. Sarcevic, L. Palen, J. White, K. Starbird, M. Bagdouri, and K. Anderson. "beacons of hope" in decentralized coordination: learning from on-the-ground medical twitterers during the 2010 haiti earthquake. In Proc. of the ACM 2012 Conf. on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '12, pages 47--56. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. C. H. Schultz, K. L. Koenig, and R. J. Lewis. Decisionmaking in hospital earthquake evacuation: does distance from the epicenter matter? Annals of emergency medicine, 50(3):320--326, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. A. Utani, T. Mizumoto, and T. Okumura. How geeks responded to a catastrophic disaster of a high-tech country: rapid development of counter-disaster systems for the great east japan earthquake of march 2011. In Proc. of the Special Workshop on Internet and Disasters, SWID '11, pages 9:1--9:8. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. D. A. Walton and L. C. Ivers. Responding to cholera in post-earthquake haiti. New England Journal of Medicine, 364(1):3--5, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. D. Yates and S. Paquette. Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 haitian earthquake. Int. J. Inf. Manag., 31(1):6--13, Feb. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. D. Yates and S. Paquette. Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 haitian earthquake. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1):6--13, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A personalized GeoSocial app for surviving an earthquake

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        EM-GIS '15: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on the Use of GIS in Emergency Management
        November 2015
        116 pages
        ISBN:9781450339704
        DOI:10.1145/2835596

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 November 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate30of54submissions,56%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader