skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Designing Noise-Minimal Rotorcraft Approach Trajectories

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 April 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

NASA and the international aviation community are investing in the development of a commercial transportation infrastructure that includes the increased use of rotorcraft, specifically helicopters and civil tilt rotors. However, there is significant concern over the impact of noise on the communities surrounding the transportation facilities. One way to address the rotorcraft noise problem is by exploiting powerful search techniques coming from artificial intelligence to design low-noise flight profiles that can be then validated though field tests. This article investigates the use of discrete heuristic search methods to design low-noise approach trajectories for rotorcraft. Our work builds on a long research tradition in trajectory optimization using either numerical methods or discrete search. Novel features of our approach include the use of a discrete search space with a resolution that can be varied, and the coupling of search with a robust simulator to evaluate candidates. The article includes a systematic comparison of different search techniques; in particular, in the experiments, we are able to do a trade study that compares complete search algorithms such as A* with faster but approximate methods such as local search.

References

  1. E. Atkins and M. Xue. 2004. Noise-sensitive final approach trajectory optimization for runway-independent aircraft. Journal of Aerospace Computation, Information and Communication 1 (2004), 269--287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. J. T. Betts. 1998. Survey of numerical methods for trajectory optimization. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics 21, 2 (1998), 193--207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. Booker, J. E. Dennis, P. D. Frank, D. B. Serafini, V. Torczon, and M. W. Trosset. 1998. A Rigorous Framework for Optimization of Expensive Functions by Surrogates. Technical Report 98-47. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. E. Bryson and Y.-C. Ho. 1975. Applied Optimal Control. Hemisphere Publishing Corp., New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. P. Cheng and S. M. Lavalle. 2002. Resolution complete rapidly-exploring random trees. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 267--272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. A. Conner, C. L. Burley, and C. D. Smith. 2006. Flight acoustic testing and data acquisition for the rotor noise model (RNM). In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society. 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. F. Fahroo and M. Ross. 2007. A perspective on methods for trajectory optimization. In AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Monterey, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Federal Aviation Administration. 2007. Environmental Desk Reference for Airport Actions. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Ferguson and A. (T.) Stentz. 2005. The Field D* Algorithm for Improved Path Planning and Replanning in Uniform and Non-Uniform Cost Environments. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-05-19. Robotics Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. G. Goplan, M. Xue, E. Atkins, and F. H. Schmitz. 2003. Longitudinal-plane simultaneous non-interfering approach trajectory design for noise minimization. In Proceedings of the 59th AHS International Forum and Technology Display. 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. H. H. Hoos and T. Stutzle. 2004. Stochastic Local Search: Foundations and Applications. Elsevier - Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. H. J. Horn. 1965. Application of an Iterative Guidance Mode to a Lunar Landing. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. L. E. Kavraki, M. N. Kolountzakis, and J.-C. Latombe. 1998. Analysis of probabilistic roadmaps for path planning. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation 14, 1 (1998), 166--171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S. M. LaValle. 2006. Planning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://planning.cs.uiuc.edu/. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. M. LaValle, M. S. Branicky, and S. R. Lindemann. 2004. On the relationship between classical grid search and probabilistic roadmaps. International Journal of Robotics Research 23, 7-8 (2004), 673--692.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. O. J. Mengshoel. 2008. Understanding the role of noise in stochastic local search: Analysis and experiments. Artificial Intelligence 172, 8-9 (2008), 955--990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. R. A. Morris, M. Donini, K. B. Venable, and M. Johnson. 2013. Designing quiet rotorcraft landing trajectories with probabilistic road maps. In Proceedings of the Scheduling and Planning Applications Workshop (SPARK’13). Rome, Italy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. R. A. Morris, K. B. Venable, and J. Lindsay. 2012a. Automated design of noise-minimal, safe rotorcraft trajectories. In Proceedings of the 68th American Helicopter Society Annual Forum & Technology Display.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. R. A. Morris, K. B. Venable, and J. Lindsay. 2012b. Simulation to support local search in trajectory optimization planning. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2012 Aerospace Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. R. A. Morris, K. B. Venable, M. Pegoraro, and J. Lindsay. 2012c. Local search for designing noise-minimal rotorcraft approach trajectories. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI'12). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Federal Interagency Committee on Noise. 1992. 1992 Federal Interagency Commitee on Noise (FICON) Report-Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. S. L. Padula, C. L. Burley, D. D. Boyd Jr., and M. A. Marcolini. 2009. Design of Quiet Rotorcraft Approach Trajectories. Technical Report NASA/TM-215771. Langley Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. J. Page, C. Wilmer, and K. J. Plotkin. 2007. Rotorcraft Noise Model Technical Reference and User Manual (Version 7). Technical Report WR 07-04. Wyle Laboratories for NASA Langley Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. P. O. Pettersson and P. Doherty. 2006. Probabilistic roadmap based path planning for an autonomous unmanned helicopter. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 17, 4 (2006), 395--405. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. B. W.-C. Sim, F. H. Schmitz, and G. Gopalan. 2002. Flight-path management/control methodology to reduce helicopter blade-vortex interaction noise. Journal of Aircraft 39, 2 (2002), 193--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. K. B. Venable, R. A. Morris, M. Johnson, A. Mousavi, and N. Oza. 2014. A machine learning surrogate for rotorcraft noise optimization. In Proceedings of the Scheduling and Planning Applications Workshop (SPARK’14).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. M. Xue. 2006. Real-Time Terminal Area Trajectory Planning for Runway Independent Aircraft. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Maryland. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. M. Xue and E. M. Atkins. 2006a. Noise-minimum runway-independent aircraft approach design for baltimore-washington international airport. Journal of Aircraft, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) 43, 1 (2006), 39--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. M. Xue and E. M. Atkins. 2006b. Terminal area trajectory optimization using simulated annealing. In Proceedings of the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. AIAA, Reno, Nevada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Designing Noise-Minimal Rotorcraft Approach Trajectories

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
          ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology  Volume 7, Issue 4
          Special Issue on Crowd in Intelligent Systems, Research Note/Short Paper and Regular Papers
          July 2016
          498 pages
          ISSN:2157-6904
          EISSN:2157-6912
          DOI:10.1145/2906145
          • Editor:
          • Yu Zheng
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2016 ACM

          © 2016 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of the United States government. As such, the United States Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 April 2016
          • Accepted: 1 October 2015
          • Revised: 1 August 2015
          • Received: 1 August 2014
          Published in tist Volume 7, Issue 4

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader