skip to main content
10.1145/2838739.2838825acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

The longevity of general purpose Wizard-of-Oz tools

Published:07 December 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Wizard-of-Oz method has been around for decades, allowing researchers and practitioners to conduct prototyping without programming. An extensive literature review conducted by the authors revealed, however, that the re-usable tools supporting the method did not seem to last more than a few years. While generic systems start to appear around the turn of the millennium, most have already fallen out of use.

Our interest in undertaking this review was inspired by the ongoing re-development of our own Wizard-of-Oz tool, the Ozlab, into a system based on web technology.

We found three factors that arguably explain why Ozlab is still in use after 15 years instead of the two-three years lifetime of other generic systems: the general approach used from its inception; its inclusion in introductory HCI curricula, and the flexible and situation-dependent design of the wizard's user interface.

References

  1. Alce, G., Wallergård, M. and Hermodsson, K. WozARd: A Wizard of Oz Method for Wearable Augmented Reality Interaction---A Pilot Study. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 2015, article ID 271231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Baum, L. F. The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. With illustrations by W. W. Denslow. Georg M. Hill Company, Chicago (1900).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellucci, A., Bottoni, P. and Levialdi, S. WOEB: Rapid Setting of Wizard of Oz Experiments and Reuse for Deployed Applications. Proceedings of the IUI'09 Workshop on Model Driven Development of Advanced User Interfaces, MDDAUI'09. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2009), Vol 439.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaudouin-Lafon, M. and Mackay, W. Prototyping tools and techniques. In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook. Third Edition, J. A. Jacko, Ed. CRC Press (2012), 1081--1104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter, A. S. and Hundhausen, C. D. How is user interface prototyping really done in practice? A survey of user interface designers. In Proc. 2010 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, 207--211. IEEE Computer Society (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Coutaz, J., Nigay, L. and Salber, D. Multimodality from the User and System Perspectives. ERCIM'95 Workshop on Multimedia Multimodal User Interfaces (1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Grill, T., Polacek, O., and Tscheligi, M. ConWIZ: A tool supporting contextual Wizard of Oz simulation. Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, MUM '12. Ulm, Germany (2012), 21--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hundhausen, C. D., Balkar, A., Nuur, M. and Trent, S. WOZ pro: a pen-based low fidelity prototyping environment to support Wizard of Oz studies. In Proc. CHI 2007. ACM Press (207), 2453--2458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kelley, J. F. An empirical methodology for writing user-friendly natural language computer applications. In Proc. CHI 1983, ACM Press (1983), 193--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Li, X. Improving the reliability and validity of Wizard-of-Oz methods. PhD Thesis. School of Computing and Engineering, University of Huddersfield (2012), eprints.hud.ac.ukGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Molin, L. Wizard-of-Oz prototyping for cooperative interaction design of graphical user interfaces. In Proc. NordiCHI 2004, ACM (2004), 425--428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Pettersson, J. S. Simulating interactive graphic user interfaces. In Proc. IT-lyftet 2001. Blekinge Tekniska Högskola (2001), 55--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Pettersson, J. S. Visualising interactive graphics design for testing with users. Digital Creativity, 13, 3 (2002), 144--156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Pettersson, J. S., and Wik, M. Perspectives on Ozlab in the cloud. A literature review of tools supporting Wizard-of-Oz experimentation. Karlstad University, Karlstad, Working paper, urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-33617 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Schlögl, S., Doherty, G., and Luz, S. Wizard of Oz experimentation for language technology applications: Challenges and tools. Interacting with Computers, 27 (2015), 592--615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Venters, C. C., Lau, L., Griffiths, M. K., Holmes, V., Ward, R. R., Jay, C., Dibsdale, and C. E., Xu, J. The blind men and the elephant: Towards an empirical evaluation framework for software sustainability. J. of Open Research Software 2, 1 (2014), e8 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The longevity of general purpose Wizard-of-Oz tools

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OzCHI '15: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction
      December 2015
      691 pages
      ISBN:9781450336734
      DOI:10.1145/2838739

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 December 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      OzCHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate47of97submissions,48%Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader