Oren Zuckerman
Guy Hoffman
ABSTRACT
We present the design and initial evaluation of Kip3, a social robotic device for students with ADHD that provides immediate feedback for inattention or impulsivity events. We designed a research platform comprised of a tablet-based Continuous Performance Test (CPT) that is used to assess inattention and impulsivity, and a socially expressive robotic device (Kip3) as feedback. We evaluated our platform with 10 students with ADHD in a within subject user study, and report that 9 out of 10 participants felt that Kip3 helped them regain focus, but wondered if it will be effective over time and how it will identify inattention in more complex situations outside the lab.
- Anastasia Anderson and Kevin Wheldall. 2003. Using self-monitoring to increase the on-task behaviour of three students with disabilities during independent work. Australasian Journal of Special Education 27, 1: 3--17.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Wilma A. Bainbridge et al. 2011. "The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents." International Journal of Social Robotics 3, no. 1: 41--52.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Russell A. Barkley. 2002. Major life activity and health outcomes associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 63, 10--15.Google Scholar
- Russell A. Barkley. 2012. Executive functions: What they are, how they work, and why they evolved. Guilford Press, New-York, NY.Google Scholar
- Mason Bretan et al. 2015. Emotionally expressive dynamic physical behaviors in robots. Int J Hum Comput Stud, 78 1--16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richard C. Clark et al. 2006. Standardized assessment of cognitive functioning during development and aging using an automated touchscreen battery. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21(5), 449--467.Google ScholarCross Ref
- George J. Dupaul et al. 1992. Behavioral treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in the classroom the use of the attention training system. Behav Modif 16, 2: 204--225.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mariellen Fischer et al. 2007. Hyperactive children as young adults: Driving abilities, safe driving behavior, and adverse driving outcomes. Accid Anal Prev 39, 1: 94--105.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Min Kwan et al. 2006. "Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human--robot interaction." Journal of communication 56, no. 4: 754--772.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Patrick Gorman et al. 2003. Effectiveness of the ISAAC cognitive prosthetic system for improving rehabilitation outcomes with neurofunctional impairment. NeuroRehabilitation 18, 1: 57--68.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Guy Hoffman et al. 2015. Design and Evaluation of a Peripheral Robotic Conversation Companion. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI' 2015), 3--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sandra JJ. Kooji et al. 2010. European consensus statement on diagnosis and treatment of adult ADHD: The European Network Adult ADHD. BMC Psychiatry 10, 1: 67.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brooke S.G. Molina et al. 2009. The MTA at 8 years: prospective follow-up of children treated for combined type ADHD in a multisite study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 48, 5: 484--500.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kazuhiko Shinozawa et al. 2005. "Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making." International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62, no. 2: 267--279. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Caroline Skirrow et al. 2009. Behavioral, neurocognitive and treatment overlap between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and mood instability. Expert Rev Neurother 9, 4: 489--503.Google ScholarCross Ref
- James M. Swanson et al. 2001. Clinical relevance of the primary findings of the MTA: success rate based on severity of ADHD and ODD symptoms at the end of treatment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 40, 2: 168--179.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oren Zuckerman and Guy Hoffman. 2015. Empathy Objects: Robotic Devices as Conversation Companions. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '15). ACM, 593--598. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- KIP3: Robotic Companion as an External Cue to Students with ADHD
Recommendations
Children with ADHD and their Care Ecosystem: Designing Beyond Symptoms
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsDesigning for children with ADHD has been of increasing interest to the HCI community. However, current approaches do not adequately involve all relevant stakeholders, and primarily focus on addressing symptoms, following a medical model of disability ...
From the bar to the bed via mobile phone: A first test of the role of problematic alcohol use, sexting, and impulsivity-related traits in sexual hookups
Computer-mediated sexting behaviors, problematic alcohol use, and sexual hookups are prevalent among college populations. While relationships between sexting and alcohol, and sexting and sex have been established, the potential role of sexting as a ...
Sexting experiences and motivations among adolescents with ADHD and ASD
AbstractSexting (i.e., to send and receive self-produced sexual materials) has become a common element in adolescents’ socio-sexual exploration. Although often harmless, sexting also involves the risk of abuse, and potentially more so for some ...
Highlights- Adolescents, including those with ADHD/ASD, mainly use sexting for sexual gratification and exploration.
Comments