skip to main content
10.1145/2851581.2892415acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract
Public Access

Beyond Smartphone Overuse: Identifying Addictive Mobile Apps

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Current research on smartphone addiction has mainly focused on addiction at the device level. This motivated us to explore more specifically on app addiction. We investigate smartphone usage for college students using surveys, logged data, and interviews. Specifically, we adapted existing smartphone addiction assessment instruments to measure app addiction. The analysis of our data shows that social and communication apps are the top 2 most addictive categories among participants. Female and male participants show no significant difference in terms of smartphone addiction. However, female participants tend to report that they are addicted to more apps. The psychological factors associated with app addiction are different between app categories. For example, compared to communication apps, participants report that it is easier to withdraw from social apps, but more difficult to control time spent on them. Correlation analysis between app usage features and app addictiveness scores reveals that compulsive open times, usage duration, and regularity of usage are good indicators of app addiction, though response time to notifications has limited predictive power.

References

  1. 2014. The Mobile Consumer: A Global Snapshot, The Nielsen Company. (Feb 2014). http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/reports-downloads/2013%20Reports/Mobile-Consumer-Report-2013.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2016. funf open sensing framework. (2016). http://funf.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Adriana Bianchi and James G Phillips. 2005. Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyberpsychology & behavior : the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society 8, 1 (Feb. 2005), 39-51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Daantje Derks, Heleen van Mierlo, and Elisabeth B Schmitz. 2014. A diary study on work-related smartphone use, psychological detachment and exhaustion: examining the role of the perceived segmentation norm. Journal of occupational health psychology 19, 1 (Jan. 2014), 74-84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. Griffiths. 1995. Technological Addictions. Clinical Psychology Forum 76 (1995), 14-19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Val Hooper and You Zhou. 2007. Addictive, Dependent, Compulsive A Study of Mobile Phone Usage. In BLED 2007 Proceedings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Val Hooper and You Zhou. 2013. Measuring Problematic Mobile Phone Use: Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the PUMP Scale. Journal of Addiction (2013), 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jonathan J Kandell. 1998. Internet Addiction on Campus: The Vulnerability of College Students. Cyberpsy., Behavior, and Soc. Networking 1, 1 (1998), 11-17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Dongil Kim, Yunhee Lee, Juyoung Lee, JeeEun Karin Nam, and Yeoju Chung. 2014. Development of Korean Smartphone Addiction Proneness Scale for Youth. PLoS ONE 9, 5 (May 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Klodiana Lanaj, Russell E. Johnson, and Christopher M. Barnes. 2014. Beginning the workday yet already depleted? Consequences of late-night smartphone use and sleep. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 124, 1 (2014), 11 - 23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Uichin Lee, Joonwon Lee, Minsam Ko, Changhun Lee, Yuhwan Kim, Subin Yang, Koji Yatani, Gahgene Gweon, Kyong-Mee Chung, and Junehwa Song. 2014b. Hooked on Smartphones: An Exploratory Study on Smartphone Overuse Among College Students. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2327-2336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yu-Kang Lee, Chun-Tuan Chang, You Lin, and ZhaoHong Cheng. 2014a. The dark side of smartphone usage: Psychological traits, compulsive behavior and technostress. Computers in Human Behavior 31 (2014), 373 - 383. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Karla Klein Murdock. 2013. Texting while stressed: Implications for students' burnout, sleep, and well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture 2, 4 (Oct. 2013), 207-221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Antti Oulasvirta, Tye Rattenbury, Lingyi Ma, and Eeva Raita. 2012. Habits Make Smartphone Use More Pervasive. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 16, 1 (Jan. 2012), 105-114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Choonsung Shin and Anind K. Dey. 2013. Automatically Detecting Problematic Use of Smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 335-344. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Chad C. Tossell, Philip Kortum, Clayton W. Shepard, Ahmad Rahmati, and Lin Zhong. 2012. Getting Real: A Naturalistic Methodology for Using Smartphones to Collect Mediated Communications. Adv. in Hum.Comp. Int. 2012, Article 10 (Jan. 2012), 1 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. L. Widyanto and M. Griffiths. 2008. Internet addiction: Does it really exist? In Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal and Transpersonal Applications. Academic Press, 61-75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Bo Yan and Guanling Chen. 2011. AppJoy: Personalized Mobile Application Discovery. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 113-126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. KIMBERLY S YOUNG. 1998. Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder. Cyberpsychology & behavior : the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society 1, 3 (Jan. 1998), 237-244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Chunhui Zhang, Ke Huang, Guanling Chen, and Linzhang Wang. 2014. MVPTrack: Energy-Efficient Places and Motion States Tracking. In Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking, and Services. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, Vol. 131. Springer International Publishing, 721-725.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Beyond Smartphone Overuse: Identifying Addictive Mobile Apps

    Recommendations

    Reviews

    Agnieszka Szymanska

    More and more, research on Internet addiction applies not only to games or time spent on the network, but also to smartphone addiction. The main aim of the analysis reported in the paper is the relation between mobile apps and proneness to smartphone addiction. The study was conducted on a sample of 26 students (18 male and eight female). The level of smartphone usage by the participants was controlled. To measure the level of overuse of smartphone apps, a modified smartphone addiction scale for adults (SAPSA), which consists of four factors-interference, virtual world, withdrawal, and tolerance-was used. Five categories of addictive apps were identified: social (for example, Facebook), communication (for example, WhatsApp, email), browsers, media and video, and games. The authors' analysis revealed that although "female and male participants show no significant difference in terms of smartphone" daily usage, female participants reported to be more addicted to apps. According to participants, "it is easier to withdraw from social apps [... rather than] control time spent on them." The analysis also revealed "that compulsive open times and usage [duration] are good indicators of app addiction." The study population is quite small to draw general conclusions. However, the results and the method can be very inspiring for other researchers. Online Computing Reviews Service

    Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

    Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      3954 pages
      ISBN:9781450340823
      DOI:10.1145/2851581

      Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '16 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of5,000submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader