skip to main content
10.1145/2851613.2851624acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An architecture for providing elasticity based on autonomic computing concepts

Published:04 April 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Elasticity is a feature quite important for cloud computing and it is related to how a system autonomously adapts its capacity over time to fit the workload variation. In this context, this paper proposes an elastic architecture for cloud computing based on autonomic computing concepts, such as control loops and thresholds-based rules. In order to validate the proposed solution, we designed two experiments that use microbenchmarks on private and hybrid cloud environments. The results show cloud computing and autonomic computing may be leveraged together for elasticity provisioning.

References

  1. M. Becker, S. Lehrig, and S. Becker. Systematically deriving quality metrics for cloud computing systems. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering, ICPE '15, pages 169--174, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Brundo Uriarte and C. Becker Westphall. Panoptes: A monitoring architecture and framework for supporting autonomic clouds. In Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS), 2014 IEEE, pages 1--5, May 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. R. Buyya, R. Calheiros, and X. Li. Autonomic cloud computing: Open challenges and architectural elements. In Emerging Applications of Information Technology (EAIT), 2012 Third International Conference on, pages 3--10, Nov 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. E. F. Coutinho, F. R. de Carvalho Sousa, P. A. L. Rego, D. G. Gomes, and J. N. de Souza. Elasticity in cloud computing: a survey. annals of telecommunications - annales des télécommunications, 70(7-8):289--309, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. E. F. Coutinho, D. G. Gomes, and J. N. d. Souza. An analysis of elasticity in cloud computing environments based on allocation time and resources. In Cloud Computing and Communications (LatinCloud), 2nd IEEE Latin American Conference on, Maceio, Brazil, dec 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. V. C. Emeakaroha, M. A. Netto, R. N. Calheiros, I. Brandic, R. Buyya, and C. A. D. Rose. Towards autonomic detection of sla violations in cloud infrastructures. Future Generation Computer Systems, 28(7):1017--1029, 2012. Special section: Quality of Service in Grid and Cloud Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. X. Etchevers, T. Coupaye, F. Boyer, N. de Palma, and G. Salaun. Automated configuration of legacy applications in the cloud. In Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC), 2011 Fourth IEEE International Conference on, pages 170--177, dec. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. H. Ghanbari, B. Simmons, M. Litoiu, and G. Iszlai. Exploring alternative approaches to implement an elasticity policy. In Cloud Computing (CLOUD), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, pages 716--723, july 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. N. R. Herbst, S. Kounev, and R. Reussner. Elasticity in cloud computing: What it is, and what it is not. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomic Computing(ICAC 2013), San Jose, CA, pages 23--27. USENIX, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P. Jamshidi, A. Ahmad, and C. Pahl. Autonomic resource provisioning for cloud-based software. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems, SEAMS 2014, pages 95--104, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. O. Kephart and D. M. Chess. The vision of autonomic computing. Computer, 36(1):41--50, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Y. Kouki and T. Ledoux. Scaling: Sla-driven cloud auto-scaling. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC '13, pages 411--414, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Mell and T. Grance. The nist definition of cloud computing. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 53(6):50, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Netto, C. Cardonha, R. Cunha, and M. Assuncao. Evaluating auto-scaling strategies for cloud computing environments. In Modelling, Analysis Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS), 2014 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on, pages 187--196, Sept 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. O. Niehorster, A. Krieger, J. Simon, and A. Brinkmann. Autonomic resource management with support vector machines. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/ACM 12th International Conference on Grid Computing, GRID '11, pages 157--164, Washington, DC, USA, 2011. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. Niu, H. Xu, B. Li, and S. Zhao. Quality-assured cloud bandwidth auto-scaling for video-on-demand applications. In INFOCOM, 2012 Proceedings IEEE, pages 460--468, march 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. S. Pandey, W. Voorsluys, S. Niu, A. Khandoker, and R. Buyya. An autonomic cloud environment for hosting ecg data analysis services. Future Generation Computer Systems, 28(1):147--154, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. X. Qin, W. Wang, W. Zhang, J. Wei, X. Zhao, and T. Huang. Elasticat: A load rebalancing framework for cloud-based key-value stores. In High Performance Computing (HiPC), 2012 19th International Conference on, pages 1--10, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. P. Rego, E. Coutinho, D. Gomes, and J. De Souza. Faircpu: Architecture for allocation of virtual machines using processing features. In Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC), 2011 Fourth IEEE International Conference on, pages 371--376, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. P. Scandurra, C. Raibulet, P. Potena, R. Mirandola, and R. Capilla. A layered coordination framework for optimizing resource allocation in adapting cloud-based applications. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC '12, pages 471--472, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Tordsson, R. S. Montero, R. Moreno-Vozmediano, and I. M. Llorente. Cloud brokering mechanisms for optimized placement of virtual machines across multiple providers. Future Generation Computer Systems, 28(2):358--367, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An architecture for providing elasticity based on autonomic computing concepts

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SAC '16: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
          April 2016
          2360 pages
          ISBN:9781450337397
          DOI:10.1145/2851613

          Copyright © 2016 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 April 2016

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          SAC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate252of1,047submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader