skip to main content
10.1145/2851613.2851729acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Circuit-switched translucent optical networks planning with user level QoS

Published: 04 April 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Nowadays optical network technology is considered the main infrastructure to support the increasing of services and applications with higher requirements of Quality of Service (e.g., e-science applications). This suggests a customized service provision with guarantee of QoS in accordance with each requirements of each user. This paper presents a methodology to plan optical networks in order to provide lightpaths dynamically with guaranteed requirements.

References

[1]
S. Azodolmolky, J. Perello, M. Angelou, F. Agraz, L. Velasco, S. Spadaro, Y. Pointurier, A. Francescon, C. Saradhi, P. Kokkinos, E. Varvarigos, S. Al Zahr, M. Gagnaire, M. Gunkel, D. Klonidis, and I. Tomkos. Experimental demonstration of an impairment aware network planning and operation tool for transparent/translucent optical networks. Lightwave Technology, Journal of, 29(4):439--448, Feb 2011.
[2]
N.-H. Bao, L.-M. Li, H.-B. Luo, H.-F. Yu, and Z.-Z. Zhang. Impairment aware sharing constraint relaxed path protection in translucent optical networks. Optical Engineering, 51(4):045002-1-045002-6, 2012.
[3]
D. Chaves, R. Carvalho, H. Pereira, C. Bastos-Filho, and J. Martins-Filho. Novel strategies for sparse regenerator placement in translucent optical networks. Photonic Network Communications, 24(3):237--251, 2012.
[4]
J. Maranhão, A. Soares, and H. Waldman. Wavelength assignment in optical networks considering physical impairments. In 12th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), pages 1--4, June 2010.
[5]
I. Nath, M. Chatterjee, and U. Bhattacharya. A survey on regenerator placement problem in translucent optical network. In Circuits, Systems, Communication and Information Technology Applications (CSCITA), 2014 International Conference on, pages 408--413, April 2014.
[6]
H. Pereira, D. Chaves, C. Bastos-Filho, and J. Martins-Filho. Osnr model to consider physical layer impairments in transparent optical networks. Photonic Network Communications, 18(2):137--149, 2009.
[7]
E. Santos, H. Pereira, C. Bastos-Filho, and R. de Freitas. Applying shared path protection scheme to optical translucent networks. In Microwave Optoelectronics Conference (IMOC), 2013 SBMO/IEEE MTT-S International, pages 1--5, Aug 2013.
[8]
A. Soares, W. Giozza, and P. Cunha. Classification strategy to mitigate unfairness in all-optical networks. In 15th IEEE International Conference on Networks - ICON2007, pages 161--165, Nov 2007.
[9]
D. Staessens, D. Colle, M. Pickavet, and P. Demeester. Impact of node directionality on restoration in translucent optical networks. In Optical Communication (ECOC), 2010 36th European Conference and Exhibition on, pages 1--3, Sept 2010.
[10]
X. Yang and B. Ramamurthy. Sparse regeneration in translucent wavelength-routed optical networks: Architecture, network design and wavelength routing. Photonic Network Communications, 10(1):39--53, 2005.
[11]
X. Yang, L. Shen, and B. Ramamurthy. Survivable lightpath provisioning in wdm mesh networks under shared path protection and signal quality constraints. Lightwave Technology, Journal of, 23(4):1556--1567, April 2005.
[12]
J. Zhang and B. Mukherjee. A review of fault management in wdm mesh networks basic concepts and research challenges. IEEE Network, pages 41--48, Mar-Apr 2004.

Index Terms

  1. Circuit-switched translucent optical networks planning with user level QoS

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SAC '16: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
    April 2016
    2360 pages
    ISBN:9781450337397
    DOI:10.1145/2851613
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 April 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. RWA
    2. planning
    3. survivability
    4. translucent optical networks

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SAC 2016
    Sponsor:
    SAC 2016: Symposium on Applied Computing
    April 4 - 8, 2016
    Pisa, Italy

    Acceptance Rates

    SAC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 252 of 1,047 submissions, 24%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,650 of 6,669 submissions, 25%

    Upcoming Conference

    SAC '25
    The 40th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
    March 31 - April 4, 2025
    Catania , Italy

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 45
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media