skip to main content
research-article

Measuring Collectiveness via Refined Topological Similarity

Published: 03 March 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Crowd system has motivated a surge of interests in many areas of multimedia, as it contains plenty of information about crowd scenes. In crowd systems, individuals tend to exhibit collective behaviors, and the motion of all those individuals is called collective motion. As a comprehensive descriptor of collective motion, collectiveness has been proposed to reflect the degree of individuals moving as an entirety. Nevertheless, existing works mostly have limitations to correctly find the individuals of a crowd system and precisely capture the various relationships between individuals, both of which are essential to measure collectiveness. In this article, we propose a collectiveness-measuring method that is capable of quantifying collectiveness accurately. Our main contributions are threefold: (1) we compute relatively accurate collectiveness by making the tracked feature points represent the individuals more precisely with a point selection strategy; (2) we jointly investigate the spatial-temporal information of individuals and utilize it to characterize the topological relationship between individuals by manifold learning; (3) we propose a stability descriptor to deal with the irregular individuals, which influence the calculation of collectiveness. Intensive experiments on the simulated and real world datasets demonstrate that the proposed method is able to compute relatively accurate collectiveness and keep high consistency with human perception.

References

[1]
Radhakrishna Achanta, Appu Shaji, Kevin Smith, Aurélien Lucchi, Pascal Fua, and Sabine Süsstrunk. 2012. SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 34, 11 (2012), 2274--2282.
[2]
Saad Ali and Mubarak Shah. 2007. A Lagrangian particle dynamics approach for crowd flow segmentation and stability analysis. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1--6.
[3]
Saad Ali and Mubarak Shah. 2008. Floor fields for tracking in high density crowd scenes. In IEEE Conference on European Conference on Computer Vision. 1--14.
[4]
João Emílio Almeida, Rosaldo J. F. Rossetti, and António Leça Coelho. 2013. Crowd simulation modeling applied to emergency and evacuation simulations using multi-agent systems. CoRR abs/1303.4692 (2013).
[5]
Michele Ballerini, Nicola Cabibbo, Raphael Candelier, Andrea Cavagna, Evaristo Cisbani, Irene Giardina, Vivien Lecomte, Alberto Orlandi, Giorgio Parisi, Andrea Procaccini, and others. 2008. Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 4 (2008), 1232--1237.
[6]
Yassine Benabbas, Nacim Ihaddadene, and Chabane Djeraba. 2011. Motion pattern extraction and event detection for automatic visual surveillance. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing 2011 (2011), 7.
[7]
Andrew Best, Sahil Narang, Sean Curtis, and Dinesh Manocha. 2014. DenseSense: Interactive crowd simulation using density-dependent filters. In The Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA'14). 97--102.
[8]
Jerome Buhl, David J. Sumpter, Iain D. Couzin, Joseph Hale, Emma Despland, Esther Miller, and Stephen J. Simpson. 2006. From disorder to order in marching locusts. Science 312, 5778 (2006), 1402--1406.
[9]
Ming-Ching Chang, Nils Krahnstoever, and Weina Ge. 2011. Probabilistic group-level motion analysis and scenario recognition. In IEEE International Conference on International Conference on Computer Vision. 747--754.
[10]
Iain D. Couzin. 2009. Collective cognition in animal groups. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13, 1 (2009), 36--43.
[11]
Weina Ge, Robert T. Collins, and Barry Ruback. 2012. Vision-based analysis of small groups in pedestrian crowds. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 34, 5 (2012), 1003--1016.
[12]
Abhinav Golas, Rahul Narain, and Ming C. Lin. 2013. Hybrid long-range collision avoidance for crowd simulation. In Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games (I3D'13). 29--36.
[13]
Stephen J. Guy, Jur van den Berg, Wenxi Liu, Rynson Lau, Ming C. Lin, and Dinesh Manocha. 2012. A statistical similarity measure for aggregate crowd dynamics. ACM Transactions on Graphics 31, 6 (2012), 190:1--190:11.
[14]
Rachel Heck, Michael N. Wallick, and Michael Gleicher. 2007. Virtual videography. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications 3, 1 (2007).
[15]
Dirk Helbing, Illés Farkas, and Tamas Vicsek. 2000. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407, 6803 (2000), 487--490.
[16]
Dirk Helbing and Peter Molnar. 1995. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical Review E 51, 5 (1995), 4282--4286.
[17]
Weiming Hu, Xuejuan Xiao, Zhouyu Fu, Dan Xie, Tieniu Tan, and Stephen J. Maybank. 2006. A system for learning statistical motion patterns. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 28, 9 (2006), 1450--1464.
[18]
Kaiqi Huang, Dacheng Tao, Yuan Yuan, Xuelong Li, and Tieniu Tan. 2009. View-independent behavior analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B 39, 4 (2009), 1028--1035.
[19]
Pierre-Marc Jodoin, Yannick Benezeth, and Yi Wang. 2013. Meta-tracking for video scene understanding. In IEEE Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance. 1--6.
[20]
Louis Kratz and Ko Nishino. 2009. Anomaly detection in extremely crowded scenes using spatio-temporal motion pattern models. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1446--1453.
[21]
Louis Kratz and Ko Nishino. 2012. Going with the flow: Pedestrian efficiency in crowded scenes. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV 2012), Part IV. 558--572.
[22]
Stanislav N. Kružkov. 1970. First order quasilinear equations in several independent variables. Sbornik: Mathematics 10, 2 (1970), 217--243.
[23]
Tian Lan, Leonid Sigal, and Greg Mori. 2012a. Social roles in hierarchical models for human activity recognition. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1354--1361.
[24]
Tian Lan, Yang Wang, Weilong Yang, Stephen N. Robinovitch, and Greg Mori. 2012b. Discriminative latent models for recognizing contextual group activities. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 34, 8 (2012), 1549--1562.
[25]
Alon Lerner, Yiorgos Chrysanthou, and Dani Lischinski. 2007. Crowds by example. Computer Graphics Forum 26, 3 (2007), 655--664.
[26]
Teng Li, Huan Chang, Meng Wang, Bingbing Ni, Richang Hong, and Shuicheng Yan. 2015. Crowded scene analysis: A survey. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Techn. 25, 3 (2015), 367--386.
[27]
Mehdi Moussaid, Simon Garnier, Guy Theraulaz, and Dirk Helbing. 2009. Collective information processing and pattern formation in swarms, flocks, and crowds. Topics in Cognitive Science 1, 3 (2009), 469--497.
[28]
Rahul Narain, Abhinav Golas, Sean Curtis, and Ming C. Lin. 2009. Aggregate dynamics for dense crowd simulation. ACM Transactions on Graphics 28, 5 (2009).
[29]
Stefano Pellegrini, Andreas Ess, Konrad Schindler, and Luc J. Van Gool. 2009. You'll never walk alone: Modeling social behavior for multi-target tracking. In IEEE International Conference on International Conference on Computer Vision. 261--268.
[30]
Craig W. Reynolds. 1987. Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model. In Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. 25--34.
[31]
Imran Saleemi, Lance Hartung, and Mubarak Shah. 2010. Scene understanding by statistical modeling of motion patterns. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2069--2076.
[32]
Paul Scovanner and Marshall F. Tappen. 2009. Learning pedestrian dynamics from the real world. In IEEE International Conference on International Conference on Computer Vision. 381--388.
[33]
Jing Shao, Chen Change Loy, and Xiaogang Wang. 2014a. Scene-independent group profiling in crowd. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2227--2234.
[34]
Ling Shao, Xiantong Zhen, Dacheng Tao, and Xuelong Li. 2014b. Spatio-temporal Laplacian pyramid coding for action recognition. IEEE T. Cybernetics 44, 6 (2014), 817--827.
[35]
Carlo Tomasi and Takeo Kanade. 1991. Detection and Tracking of Point Features. School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
[36]
Jur van den Berg, Stephen J. Guy, Ming C. Lin, and Dinesh Manocha. 2009. Reciprocal n-body collision avoidance. In International Symposium on Robotics Research. 3--19.
[37]
Tamás Vicsek, András Czirók, Eshel Ben-Jacob, Inon Cohen, and Ofer Shochet. 1995. Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Physical Review Letters 75, 6 (1995), 1226.
[38]
Qi Wang, Yuan Yuan, and Pingkun Yan. 2013a. Visual saliency by selective contrast. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 23, 7 (2013), 1150--1155.
[39]
Qi Wang, Yuan Yuan, Pingkun Yan, and Xuelong Li. 2013b. Saliency detection by multiple-instance learning. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 43, 2 (2013), 660--672.
[40]
Xiaogang Wang, Keng Teck Ma, Gee Wah Ng, and W. Eric L. Grimson. 2008. Trajectory analysis and semantic region modeling using a nonparametric Bayesian model. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1--8.
[41]
Xiaogang Wang, Keng Teck Ma, Gee Wah Ng, and W. Eric L. Grimson. 2011. Trajectory analysis and semantic region modeling using nonparametric hierarchical Bayesian models. International Journal of Computer Vision 95, 3 (2011), 287--312.
[42]
Xiaogang Wang, Xiaoxu Ma, and W. Eric L. Grimson. 2009. Unsupervised activity perception in crowded and complicated scenes using hierarchical Bayesian models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 31, 3 (2009), 539--555.
[43]
Chuan Yang, Lihe Zhang, Huchuan Lu, Xiang Ruan, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. 2013. Saliency detection via graph-based manifold ranking. In 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3166--3173.
[44]
Yang Yang, Jingen Liu, and Mubarak Shah. 2009. Video scene understanding using multi-scale analysis. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision. 1669--1676.
[45]
Machi Zawidzki, Mohcine Chraibi, and Katsuhiro Nishinari. 2014. Crowd-Z: The user-friendly framework for crowd simulation on an architectural floor plan. Pattern Recognition Letters 44 (2014), 88--97.
[46]
H. P. Zhang, A. Ber, E. L. Florin, and H. L. Swinney. 2010. Collective motion and density fluctuations in bacterial colonies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 107, 31 (2010), 13626--13630.
[47]
Peng Zhang, Hong Liu, and Yanhui Ding. 2015. Crowd simulation based on constrained and controlled group formation. The Visual Computer 31, 1 (2015), 5--18.
[48]
Lin Zhao, Xinbo Gao, Dacheng Tao, and Xuelong Li. 2015. A deep structure for human pose estimation. Signal Processing 108 (2015), 36--45.
[49]
Xin Zhao, Xue Li, Chaoyi Pang, Quan Z. Sheng, Sen Wang, and Mao Ye. 2014. Structured streaming skeleton—A new feature for online human gesture recognition. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications 11, 1 (2014), 22:1--22:18.
[50]
Liping Zheng, Juan Zhang, Chenglong Zhou, and Xiaoping Liu. 2014. Texture diversity generating method for characters in crowd simulation. Journal of Graphics 35, 1 (2014), 110--114.
[51]
Bolei Zhou, Xiaoou Tang, and Xiaogang Wang. 2012. Coherent filtering: Detecting coherent motions from crowd clutters. In IEEE Conference on European Conference on Computer Vision. 857--871.
[52]
Bolei Zhou, Xiaoou Tang, Hepeng Zhang, and Xiaogang Wang. 2014. Measuring crowd collectiveness. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 36, 8 (2014), 1586--1599.
[53]
Bolei Zhou, Xiaogang Wang, and Xiaoou Tang. 2011. Random field topic model for semantic region analysis in crowded scenes from tracklets. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3441--3448.
[54]
Bolei Zhou, Xiaogang Wang, and Xiaoou Tang. 2012. Understanding collective crowd behaviors: Learning a mixture model of dynamic pedestrian-agents. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2871--2878.
[55]
Dengyong Zhou, Olivier Bousquet, Thomas Navin Lal, Jason Weston, and Bernhard Schölkopf. 2003a. Learning with local and global consistency. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16 Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2003). 321--328.
[56]
Dengyong Zhou, Jason Weston, Arthur Gretton, Olivier Bousquet, and Bernhard Schölkopf. 2003b. Ranking on data manifolds. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16 (NIPS 2003). 169--176.
[57]
Suiping Zhou, Wentong Cai, Stephen John Turner, Bu-Sung Lee, and Junhu Wei. 2007. Critical causal order of events in distributed virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications 3, 3 (2007).

Cited By

View all
  • (2023) Efficient Retrieval of the Top- k Most Relevant Event-Partner Pairs IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2021.311855235:3(2529-2543)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Motion Pattern-Based Scene Classification Using Adaptive Synthetic Oversampling and Fully Connected Deep Neural NetworkIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.332746311(119659-119675)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)Multimedia datasets for anomaly detection: a reviewMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-023-17425-z83:19(56785-56835)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Measuring Collectiveness via Refined Topological Similarity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
    ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications  Volume 12, Issue 2
    March 2016
    224 pages
    ISSN:1551-6857
    EISSN:1551-6865
    DOI:10.1145/2837041
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 March 2016
    Accepted: 01 October 2015
    Revised: 01 September 2015
    Received: 01 April 2015
    Published in TOMM Volume 12, Issue 2

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Multimedia
    2. collectiveness
    3. crowd analysis
    4. feature extraction
    5. manifold

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Funding Sources

    • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
    • Open Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Spectral Imaging Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
    • National Natural Science Foundation of China
    • Natural Science Foundation Research Project of Shaanxi Province

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023) Efficient Retrieval of the Top- k Most Relevant Event-Partner Pairs IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2021.311855235:3(2529-2543)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2023
    • (2023)Motion Pattern-Based Scene Classification Using Adaptive Synthetic Oversampling and Fully Connected Deep Neural NetworkIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.332746311(119659-119675)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2023)Multimedia datasets for anomaly detection: a reviewMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-023-17425-z83:19(56785-56835)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2023
    • (2022)Motion pattern-based crowd scene classification using histogram of angular deviations of trajectoriesThe Visual Computer: International Journal of Computer Graphics10.1007/s00371-021-02356-339:2(557-567)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2022
    • (2020)Quantifying and Detecting Collective Motion in Crowd ScenesIEEE Transactions on Image Processing10.1109/TIP.2020.298528429(5571-5583)Online publication date: 2020
    • (2019)Classification of Moving Crowd Based on Motion Pattern2019 IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP)10.1109/TENSYMP46218.2019.8971252(102-107)Online publication date: Jun-2019
    • (2019)Multimodal deep learning based on multiple correspondence analysis for disaster managementWorld Wide Web10.1007/s11280-018-0636-422:5(1893-1911)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2019
    • (2018)Measuring Crowd Collectiveness by Macroscopic and Microscopic Motion ConsistenciesIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2018.283260120:12(3311-3323)Online publication date: Dec-2018
    • (2018)A Cascaded Part-Based System for Fine-Grained Vehicle ClassificationIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2017.274996119:1(273-283)Online publication date: Jan-2018
    • (2018)Auxiliary learning for crowd counting via count-netNeurocomputing10.1016/j.neucom.2017.08.018273:C(190-198)Online publication date: 17-Jan-2018
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media