skip to main content
10.1145/2856767.2856804acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

No more Autobahn!: Scenic Route Generation Using Googles Street View

Published:07 March 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Navigation systems allow drivers to find the shortest or fastest path between two or multiple locations mostly using time or distance as input parameters. Various researchers extended traditional route planning approaches by taking into account the user's preferences, such as enjoying a coastal view or alpine landscapes during a drive. Current approaches mainly rely on volunteered geographic information (VGI), such as point of interest (POI) data from OpenStreetMap, or social media data, such as geotagged photos from Flickr, to generate scenic routes. While these approaches use proximity, distribution or other spatial relationships of the data sets, they do not take into account the actual view on specific route segments. In this paper, we propose Autobahn: a system for generating scenic routes using Google Street View images to classify route segments based on their visual characteristics enhancing the driving experience. We show that this vision-based approach can complement other approaches for scenic route planning and introduce a personalized scenic route by aligning the characteristics of the route to the preferences of the user.

References

  1. Majid Alivand, Hartwig Hochmair, and Sivaramakrishnan Srinivasan. 2015. Analyzing how travelers choose scenic routes using route choice models. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 50 (2015), 41--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Paolo Bolzoni, Sven Helmer, Kevin Wellenzohn, Johann Gamper, and Periklis Andritsos. 2014. Efficient Itinerary Planning with Category Constraints. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (SIGSPATIAL '14). 203--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brent Hecht and Monica Stephens. 2014. A tale of cities: Urban biases in volunteered geographic information. Proc. of ICWSM (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hartwig Hochmair. 2010. Spatial Association of Geotagged Photos with Scenic Locations. Geospatial Crossroads@ GI Forum 10 (2010), 91--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hillary Page Ive, Wendy Ju, and Kirstin Kohler. 2014. Quantitative Measures of User Experience in Autonomous Driving Simulators. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '14). 1--3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Yangqing Jia, Evan Shelhamer, Jeff Donahue, Sergey Karayev, Jonathan Long, Ross Girshick, Sergio Guadarrama, and Trevor Darrell. 2014. Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embedding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.5093 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey Hinton. 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 1097--1105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Maaret Posti, Johannes Schöning, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2014. Unexpected journeys with the HOBBIT: the design and evaluation of an asocial hiking app. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. ACM, 637--646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Xiaochun Qin, Michael J Meitner, Brent Chamberlain, and Xiaoning Zhang. 2008. Estimating visual quality of scenic highway using GIS and landscape visualizations. In ESRI Users Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Pavel Andreevich Samsonov, Brent Hecht, and Johannes Schöning. 2015. From Automatic Sign Detection To Space Usage Rules Mining For Autonomous Driving. In CHI 2015 Workshop on Experiencing Autonomous Vehicles: Crossing the Boundaries between a Drive and a Ride. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Martin Traunmueller, Ava Fatah gen Schieck, Johannes Schöning, and Duncan Brumby. 2013. The path is the reward: considering social networks to contribute to the pleasure of urban strolling. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 919--924. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jianwei Zhang, Hiroshi Kawasaki, and Yukiko Kawai. 2008. A Tourist Route Search System Based on Web Information and the Visibility of Scenic Sights. In Second International Symposium on Universal Communication, 2008 (ISUC '08). 154--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Yan-Tao Zheng, Shuicheng Yan, Zheng-Jun Zha, Yiqun Li, Xiangdong Zhou, Tat-Seng Chua, and Ramesh Jain. 2013. GPSView: A Scenic Driving Route Planner. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 9, 1, Article 3 (Feb. 2013), 18 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Bolei Zhou, Agata Lapedriza, Jianxiong Xiao, Antonio Torralba, and Aude Oliva. 2014. Learning deep features for scene recognition using places database. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 487--495.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. No more Autobahn!: Scenic Route Generation Using Googles Street View

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IUI '16: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
      March 2016
      446 pages
      ISBN:9781450341370
      DOI:10.1145/2856767

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 March 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      IUI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate49of194submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader