skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858149acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
note

Make it Simple, or Force Users to Read?: Paraphrased Design Improves Comprehension of End User License Agreements

Published: 07 May 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Users often react negatively towards applications that track their personal information, even though they have consented to such tracking by hitting the "I Agree" button on the application's end user license agreement (EULA). This is because most users do not read the EULA carefully. The language and presentation of EULAs are often dull, dense and inaccessible. Researchers have proposed design options for heightening comprehension of EULA content, but the effectiveness of these suggestions is unclear. To address this gap, we conducted an experiment that examined how users' attitudes towards EULAs are affected by paraphrased and forced EULA formats. Paraphrased EULA presentations increased the time spent on reading the EULA. Moreover, they elicited more positive attitudes toward the EULA, which in turn predicted better comprehension. These findings hold implications for design of EULAs by showing that complex content displayed in simple terms across multiple windows can increase reader comprehension.

References

[1]
Ben-Shahar, O. The myth of the "opportunity to read" in contract law. European Review of Contract Law, 5, 1(2009), 1--28.
[2]
Bernstein, G. R. The fine print: Redesigning legal contracts for the digital environment. Retrieved from http://typographichub.org/images/uploads/downloads/th e_fine_print.pdf
[3]
Böhme, & Köspell, S. Trained to accept? A field experiment on consent dialogues. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2010, 2403--2406.
[4]
Good, N. S., Grossklags, J., Mulligan, D. K., & Konstan, J. A. Noticing notice: A large-scale experiment on the timing of software licensing agreements. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2007, 607--616.
[5]
Hayes, A., & Preacher. Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, in press.
[6]
Kay, M., & Terry, M. Textured agreements: Reenvisioning electronic consent. Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, 2010.
[7]
Masson, M. E. J., & Waldron, M. A. Comprehension of legal contracts by non-experts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 1(1994), 67--85.
[8]
Nielsen, J. Designing Web Usability. Berkeley: New Riders 2000.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploration of User Perspectives around Software and Data-Related Challenges Associated with IoT Repair and Maintenance against Obsolescence: User Study on Software and Data Interactions and Considerations for IoT Repair and Maintenance against ObsolescenceProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685383(1-17)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Making EULA Great Again: A Novel Nudge Mechanism to Improve Readability, User Attention and AwarenessInformation Systems Security10.1007/978-3-031-80020-7_20(338-358)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2024
  • (2023)The access control double bind: How everyday interfaces regulate access and privacy, enable surveillance, and enforce identityConvergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies10.1177/1354856523119370630:3(1186-1218)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Make it Simple, or Force Users to Read?: Paraphrased Design Improves Comprehension of End User License Agreements

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 07 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. end user license agreement (EULA)
      2. interface design

      Qualifiers

      • Note

      Conference

      CHI'16
      Sponsor:
      CHI'16: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 7 - 12, 2016
      California, San Jose, USA

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 565 of 2,435 submissions, 23%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI 2025
      ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 26 - May 1, 2025
      Yokohama , Japan

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)51
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
      Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Exploration of User Perspectives around Software and Data-Related Challenges Associated with IoT Repair and Maintenance against Obsolescence: User Study on Software and Data Interactions and Considerations for IoT Repair and Maintenance against ObsolescenceProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685383(1-17)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Making EULA Great Again: A Novel Nudge Mechanism to Improve Readability, User Attention and AwarenessInformation Systems Security10.1007/978-3-031-80020-7_20(338-358)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2024
      • (2023)The access control double bind: How everyday interfaces regulate access and privacy, enable surveillance, and enforce identityConvergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies10.1177/1354856523119370630:3(1186-1218)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2023
      • (2023)Designing for privacy: Exploring the influence of affect and individual characteristics on users' interactions with privacy policiesComputers & Security10.1016/j.cose.2023.103468134(103468)Online publication date: Nov-2023
      • (2023)Who Is Benefiting from Your Fitness Data? A Privacy Analysis of SmartwatchesSecurity Protocols XXVIII10.1007/978-3-031-43033-6_11(97-112)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
      • (2023)Increasing Users’ Privacy Awareness in the Internet of Things: Design Space and Sample ScenariosHuman Factors in Privacy Research10.1007/978-3-031-28643-8_16(321-336)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2023
      • (2022)“I saw your partner naked”: Exploring Privacy Challenges During Video-based Online MeetingsProceedings of the 21st International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3568444.3568468(71-82)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2022
      • (2022)Implications of XR on Privacy, Security and Behaviour: Insights from ExpertsNordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference10.1145/3546155.3546691(1-12)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022
      • (2022)Online Terms and Conditions: Improving User Engagement, Awareness, and Satisfaction through UI DesignProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517720(1-22)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
      • (2022)Displaying Software Installation Agreements to Motivate Users’ ReadingInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2022.210895939:20(4006-4023)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2022
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media