skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858162acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing for the Other 'Hereafter': When Older Adults Remember about Forgetting

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Designing to support memory for older individuals is a complex challenge in human-computer interaction (HCI) research. Past literature on human memory has mapped processes for recalling past experiences, learning new things, remembering to carry out future intentions and the importance of attention. However, the understanding of how older adults perceive forgetting in daily life remains limited. This paper narrows this gap through a study with older persons (n=18) living independently using self-reporting and semi-structured focus groups to explore what they forget, how they react, and what mechanisms they put in place to recover from and avoid forgetting. Findings include occurrences of prospective and retrospective memory lapses, conflicting negative and neutral perceptions, and techniques to manage forgetting. Participant responses indicate that an awareness of forgetting fosters internal tensions among older adults, thereby creating opportunities for further design research, e.g., to defuse and normalise these reactions.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn0733-file3.mp4

mp4

8 MB

References

  1. Alan D. Baddeley. 2004. The psychology of memory. In The Essential Handbook of Memory Disorders for Clinicians, Alan D. Baddeley, Michael Kopelman, and Barbara A. Wilson (eds.). John Wiley & Sons, UK, 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Liam J. Bannon. 2006. Forgetting as a feature, not a bug: the duality of memory and implications for ubiquitous computing. CoDesign 2, 01: 3--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2: 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. James Allan Cheyne, Jonathan S. A. Carriere, and Daniel Smilek. 2006. Absent-mindedness: Lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures. Consciousness and cognition, 15, 3: 578--592.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Martin A. Conway, M.A., 2005. Memory and the self. Journal of memory and language, 53(4), pp.594--628.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Dan Cosley, Victoria Schwanda Sosik, S. Tejaswi Peesapati, Johnathon Schultz, and Soyoung Lee. 2012. Experiences with designing tools for everyday reminiscing. Human-Computer Interaction 27, 1--2: 175--198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Roger A. Dixon, Brent J. Small, Stuart W.S. MacDonald, and John J. McArdle. 2012. Yes, memory declines with aging--but when, how, and why? In Memory and Aging, Moshe NavehBenjamin and Nabuo Ohta (eds.). Psychology Press, NY, NY, 326--347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Judi Ellis. 1996. Prospective memory or the realization of delayed intentions: A conceptual framework for research. In Prospective memory: Theory and applications, Maria A. Brandimonte, Gilles O. Einstein and Mark A. McDaniel (eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Arthur D. Fisk, Wendy A. Rogers, Neil Charness, Sara J. Czaja, Joseph Sharit. 2009. Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches. CRC press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Joseph L. Fleiss. 2004. The measurement of interrater agreement. In Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, Joseph L. Fleiss, Bruce Levin, and Myunghee Cho Paik (eds.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 598--626.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Christopher Frayling. 1993. Research in art and design. Royal College of Art, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 937--946. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Peter Gregor, Alan F. Newell, and Mary Zajicek. 2002. Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people. In Proceedings of the fifth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies (Assets '02). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 151--156. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/638249.638277 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Celia B. Harris, John Sutton, and Amanda J. Barnier. 2010. Autobiographical forgetting, social forgetting and situated forgetting, In Forgetting, Sergio Della Sala (ed.). Psychology Press, 271--284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Adriana Ispas, Sarah Schöni, and Moira C. Norrie. 2012. ARENO: ambient reminder notes. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian ComputerHuman Interaction Conference (OzCHI '12), Vivienne Farrell, Graham Farrell, Caslon Chua, Weidong Huang, Raj Vasa, and Clinton Woodward (Eds.). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 253--262. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2414536.2414580 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Karen A. Kit and Holly A. Tuokko and Catherine A. Mateer. 2008. A review of the stereotype threat literature and its application in a neurological population. Neuropsychology review 18, 2: 132148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Arthur F. Kramer and David J. Madden. 2011. Attention In The handbook of aging and cognition, Fergus I.M. Craik and Timothy A. Salthouse (eds.), Psychology Press, NY, 189--249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mik Lamming, Peter Brown, Kathleen Carter, Margery Eldridge, Mike Flynn, Gifford Louie, Peter Robinson and Abigail Sellen. 1994. The design of a human memory prosthesis. The Computer Journal 37, 3: 153--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. J. Richard Landis and Gary G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Stephen Lindsay, Katie Brittain, Daniel Jackson, Cassim Ladha, Karim Ladha, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Empathy, participatory design and people with dementia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 521--530. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207749 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sophie Martin, Clémence Mazzocco, Pascale Maury, Anne Grosselin, Wim Van der Elst, Roger A. Dixon, Yannick Stephan, and Denis Brouillet. 2015. Compensating for memory losses throughout adulthood: Validation and normalization of the Memory Compensation Questionnaire for nonclinical French populations. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 60, 28--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Viktor Mayer-Schönberger. 2011. Delete: the virtue of forgetting in the digital age. Princeton University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Marilyn Rose McGee-Lennon, Maria Klara Wolters, and Stephen Brewster. 2011. User-centred multimodal reminders for assistive living. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2105--2114. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979248 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Anne-Sophie Melenhorst, Wendy A. Rogers and Don G. Bouwhuis. 2006. Older adults' motivated choice for technological innovation: evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. Psychology and aging 21, 1: 190--195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sarah Mennicken, Jo Vermeulen, and Elaine M. Huang. 2014. From today's augmented houses to tomorrow's smart homes: new directions for home automation research. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 105--115. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2636076 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Tracy L. Mitzner and Katinka Dijkstra. 2010. EHealth for Older Adults: Assessing and Evaluating User Centered Design with Subjective Methods. In Human-Centered Design of E-Health Technologies: Concepts, Methods and Applications, Martina Ziefle and Carsten Röcker (eds.). IGI Global, Pennsylvania, 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Wolfgang Nejdl and Claudia Niederee. 2015. Photos to Remember, Photos to Forget. IEEE MultiMedia, 22, 1: 6--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Donald A. Norman and Tim Shallice. 1986. Attention to action. In Consciousness and SelfRegulation: Advances in Research and Theory Vol. 4, Richard J. Davidson, Gary E. Schwartz, David Shapiro (eds.). (pp. 1--18). Springer US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. James T. Reason. 1984. Lapses of attention in everyday life. In Varieties of attention, Raja Parasuraman and D.R. Davies (eds.). Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 515--549.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. James T. Reason. 1990. Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Peter G. Rendell, and Fergus IM Craik. 2000. Virtual week and actual week: Age-related differences in prospective memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology 14,7: S43--S62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Bradley J. Rhodes. 1997. The wearable remembrance agent: A system for augmented memory. Personal Technologies 1, 4: 218--224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Henry L. Roediger III, Yana Weinstein, and Pooja K. Agarwal. 2010. Forgetting: Preliminary considerations, In Forgetting, Sergio Della Sala (ed.). Psychology Press, 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Yvonne Rogers, Jeni Paay, Margot Brereton, Kate L. Vaisutis, Gary Marsden, and Frank Vetere. 2014. Never too old: engaging retired people inventing the future with MaKey MaKey. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 3913--3922. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557184 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Corina Sas and Steve Whittaker. 2013, April. Design for forgetting: disposing of digital possessions after a breakup. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13) 1823--1832. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Daniel L. Schacter. 2002. The Seven Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and Remembers. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Lael J. Schooler and Ralph Hertwig. 2005. How forgetting aids heuristic inference. Psychological Review 112, 3: 610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Abigail J. Sellen, Andrew Fogg, Mike Aitken, Steve Hodges, Carsten Rother, and Ken Wood. 2007. Do life-logging technologies support memory for the past?: an experimental study using sensecam. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 8190. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240636 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Larry R. Squire. 2004. Memory systems of the brain: a brief history and current perspective. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 82, 3: 171--177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Katarzyna Stawarz, Anna L. Cox, and Ann Blandford. 2014. Don't forget your pill!: designing effective medication reminder apps that support users' daily routines. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2269--2278. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557079 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. W. Scott Terry. 1988. Everyday forgetting: Data from a diary study. Psychological Reports 62, 1: 299--303.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Wenn-Chieh Tsai, Po-Hao Wang, Hung-Chi Lee, Rung-Huei Liang, and Jane Hsu. 2014. The reflexive printer: toward making sense of perceived drawbacks in technology-mediated reminiscence. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 995--1004. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598589 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Endel Tulving. 1972. Episodic and semantic memory. In Organization of Memory. Academic Press, London and NY, 381--402.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Endel Tulving. 1985. Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne 26, 1 (Jan 1985), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Nash Unsworth, Gene A. Brewer, and Gregory J. Spillers. 2012. Variation in cognitive failures: An individual differences investigation of everyday attention and memory failures. Journal of Memory and Language 67, 1: 1--16Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Elise van den Hoven. 2014. A future-proof past: Designing for remembering experiences. Memory Studies 7, 3: 370--384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Elise van den Hoven and Berry Eggen. 2008. Informing augmented memory system design through autobiographical memory theory. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 12, 6: 433--443. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Elise van den Hoven and Berry Eggen. 2014. The cue is key: Design for real-life remembering. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 222, 2: 110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Elise van den Hoven, Corina Sas and Steve Whittaker. 2012. Introduction to this special issue on designing for personal memories: past, present, and future. Human-Computer Interaction 27,1--2: 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Sunil Vemuri. 2005. Personal Long-Term Memory Aids. Ph.D Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Julie R. Williamson, Marilyn McGee-Lennon, Euan Freeman, and Stephen Brewster. 2013. Designing a smartpen reminder system for older adults. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 73--78. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468371 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Mary Zajicek. 2006. Aspects of HCI research for older people. Universal Access in the Information Society 5,3: 279--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 493--502. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Designing for the Other 'Hereafter': When Older Adults Remember about Forgetting

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2016
        6108 pages
        ISBN:9781450333627
        DOI:10.1145/2858036

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 May 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader