skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858289acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Power of Collective Endorsements: Credibility Factors in Medical Crowdfunding Campaigns

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Traditional medical fundraising charities have been relying on third-party watchdogs and carefully crafting their reputation over time to signal their credibility to potential donors. As medical fundraising campaigns migrate to online platforms in the form of crowdfunding, potential donors can no longer rely on the organization's traditional methods for achieving credibility. Individual fundraisers must establish credibility on their own. Potential donors, therefore, seek new factors to assess the credibility of crowdfunding campaigns. In this paper, we investigate current practices in assessing the credibility of online medical crowdfunding campaigns. We report results from a mixed-methods study that analyzed data from social media and semi-structured interviews. We discovered eleven factors associated with the perceived credibility of medical crowdfunding. Of these, three communicative/emotional factors were unique to medical crowdfunding. We also found a distinctive validation practice, the collective endorsement. Close-connections' online presence and external online communities come together to form this collective endorsement in online medical fundraising campaigns. We conclude by describing how fundraisers can leverage collective endorsements to improve their campaigns' perceived credibility.

References

  1. Tim Althoff and Jure Leskovec. 2015. Donor Retention in Online Crowdfunding Communities?: A Case Study of DonorsChoose.org. Proc. WWW 2015, ACM Press, 34-44. http://doi.org/10.1145/2736277.2741120 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Lisa Anthony, Yoojin Kim, and Leah Findlater. 2013. Analyzing user-generated youtube videos to understand touchscreen use by people with motor impairments. Proc. CHI 2013, ACM Press, 1223-1232. http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466158 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Andre Bourque. Is Crowdfunding Your Medical Expenses Risky or Reasonable? Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andre-bourque/iscrowdfunding-your-medi_b_7088486.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gordon Burtch and Jason Chan. 2014. Reducing Medical Bankruptcy Through Crowdfunding : Evidence from GiveForward. Proc. ICIS 2014, 1-19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gordon Burtch, Anindya Ghose, and Sunhil Wattal. 2014. Cultural Differences and Geography As Determinants of Online Pro-Social Lending. MIS Quarterly 1: 1-44. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1692661 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Quianzhou Du, Zhilei Qiao, Weiguo Fan, Mi Zhou, Xuan Zhang, and Alan G. Wang. 2015. Money Talks : A Predictive Model on Crowdfunding Success Using Project Description. Proc. ACIS 2015, 1-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. B J Fogg, Jonathan Marshall, Othman Laraki, et al. 2001. What Makes Web Sites Credible? A Report on a Large Quantitative Study. Proc. CHI 2001, 61-68. http://doi.org/10.1145/365024.365037 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. B. J. Fogg, Cathy Soohoo, David R. Danielson, Leslie Marable, Julianne Stanford, and Ellen R. Tauber. 2003. How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites? Proc. DUX 2003, ACM Press, 1-15. http://doi.org/10.1145/997078.997097 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jeff Galak, Deborah Small, and Andrew T Stephen. 2011. Microfinance Decision Making: A Field Study of Prosocial Lending. Journal of Marketing Research 48: S130-S137. http://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.SPL.S130Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Elizabeth M Gerber and Julie Hui. 2013. Crowdfunding : Motivations and Deterrents for Participation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 6: 32. http://doi.org/10.1145/2530540 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Margaret Gibelman and Sheldon R. Gelman. 2004. A loss of credibility: Patterns of wrongdoing among nongovernmental organizations. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 15, 4: 355- 381. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-004--1237--7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Michael D. Greenberg and Elizabeth M. Gerber. 2014. Learning to Fail: Experiencing Public Failure Online Through Crowdfunding. Proc. CHI 2014, ACM Press, 581-590. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557110 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. David U. Himmelstein, Deborah Thorne, Elizabeth Warren, and Steffie Woolhandler. 2009. Medical Bankruptcy in the USA, 2007: Results of a National Study. American Journal of Medicine 122, 8: 741-746. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.04.012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Julie S. Hui, Elizabeth M. Gerber, and Darren Gergle. 2014. Understanding and Leveraging Social Networks for Crowdfunding: Opportunities and Challenges. Proc. DIS 2014, ACM Press, 2083-2088. http://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2581289 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Julie S. Hui, Michael D. Greenberg, and Elizabeth M. Gerber. 2014. Understanding the role of community in crowdfunding work. Proc. CSCW 2014: 62-74. http://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531715 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sungwook Hwang. 2010. The effect of charitable giving by celebrities on the personal public relations. Public Relations Review 36, 3: 313-315. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.04.010Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Dieter W. Joenssen, Anne Michaelis, and Thomas Müllerleile. 2014. A Link to New Product Preannouncement: Success Factors in Crowdfunding. SSRN 2014 49, 0: 0-22. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2476841Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Aniket Kittur, Bongwon Suh, Ed H Chi, and Palo Alto. 2008. Can You Ever Trust a Wiki? Impacting Perceived Trustworthiness in Wikipedia. Proc. CSCW 2008, ACM Press, 7-10. http://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460639 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Miriam J. Metzger. 2007. Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, 13: 2078-2091. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.v58:13 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Tanushree Mitra and E Gilbert. 2014. The Language that Gets People to Give: Phrases that Predict Success on Kickstarter. Proc. CSCW 2014: 49-61. http://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531656 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ethan Mollick. 2014. The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing 29: 1-16. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Meredith Ringel Morris, Scott Counts, Asta Roseway, Aaron Hoff, and Julia Schwarz. 2012. Tweeting is believing? Proc. CSCW 2012, ACM Press, 441-450. http://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145274Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Peter Pirolli, Evelin Wollny, and Bongwon Suh. 2009. So You Know You're Getting the Best Possible Information: A Tool that Increases Wikipedia Credibility. Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press, 1505-1508. http://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518929 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Vineeth Rakesh, Jaegul Choo, and Chandan Reddy. 2015. Project Recommendation Using Heterogeneous Traits in Crowdfunding. Proc. ICSWM 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Soo Young Rieh. 2002. Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53, 2: 145-161. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10017 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Rhianna Schmunk. Kyle McConkey, B.C. Teen, Passes Away After Battle With Leukemia. Huffpost British Columbia. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/03/20/kylemcconkey-passes-away_n_6910980.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Julia Sisler. 2012. Crowdfunding for medical expenses. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal 184, 2: 123-124. http://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109--4084Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Krystine Therriault. 2014. Scammers in the spotlight after exploiting story of of 18 year old with leukemia. Crowdfundingpr. Retrieved from http://www.crowdfundingpr.org/scammers-spotlightexploiting-story-18-year-old-leukemia/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. David Thomas. 2006. A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation 27, 2: 237-246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Ilya Tirdatov. 2014. Web-Based Crowd Funding : Rhetoric of Success. Technical Communication 61, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Darcy Warkentin, Michael Woodworth, Jeffrey T. Hancock, and Nicole Cormier. 2010. Warrants and deception in computer mediated communication. Proc. CSCW 2010, ACM Press, 9-12. http://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718922 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Anbang Xu, Xiao Yang, Huaming Rao, Wai-tat Fu, Shih-wen Huang, and Brian P Bailey. 2014. Show Me the Money! An Analysis of Project Updates during Crowdfunding Campaigns. Proc. CHI 2014, ACM Press, 591-600. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557045 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Compassion. Retrieved from http://www.compassion.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Impact of DonorsChoose.com. Retrieved from http://www.donorschoose.org/about/impact.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Impact of Kiva.org. Retrieved from http://www.kiva.org/team/fsm/impactGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Better Business Wise Giving Alliance. Retrieved from www.give.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Nvivo Tool. Retrieved from http://www.qsrinternational.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Power of Collective Endorsements: Credibility Factors in Medical Crowdfunding Campaigns

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader